insults don't effect me. being a winded dumbass fart in my direction, does however.

BlindSophist said:

akira_akuma said:

i'm with stupid, is agreeing? it's more like you're calling me and anyone who "agreed" with what Moonrockmushy said, is stupid?

oh well, if that's what you say... i actually edited that in... i'll take it back. don't fuck off then, you mother.

---

By "stupid" I kinda meant "anybody capable of the no-brainer realization that we deserve to know as much as possible about what goes into the food we buy."

I seriously need to work on my Internet Irony habit. It never works.

---

Prisoner#1 said:

have you thought of seeking help for this problem of yours, I hear canada has wonderful
mental health facilities where the CIA will dose you with LSD and shit

---

have you thought of not being an ignoramus?

Aser said:

I don't think they should be required to inform customers about the contents of their food. If people have an issue with a lack of ingredient disclosure, they can always choose to eat elsewhere.

---

yeah, so how are they supposed to know if they want to eat somewhere else, if they don't know what should or shouldn't be disclosed, in the first place?

akira_akuma said:

insults don't effect me. being a winded dumbass fart in my direction, does however.

BlindSophist said:

akira_akuma said:

i'm with stupid, is agreeing? it's more like you're calling me and anyone who "agreed" with what Moonrockmushy said, is stupid?

oh well, if that's what you say... i actually edited that in... i'll take it back. don't fuck off then, you mother.

---

By "stupid" I kinda meant "anybody capable of the no-brainer realization that we deserve to know as much as possible about what goes into the food we buy."

I seriously need to work on my Internet Irony habit. It never works.

---

nobody is talking about what the thread is about, so, i agreed merely to aspire to talk about what the thread is about... and not that horse meat is good, which is what most of the users are derping about.

i understood that it was an insult. i just am point out that you're saying you're agreeing with me, by calling me stupid, making you quite stupid as well, as you're apparently calling yourself stupid, by agreeing with me with that "i'm with stupid" statement.

so you're insulting yourself as well, or are you just bad at sarcasm?

---

Prisoner#1 said:

moonrockmushy said:

Prisoner#1 said:

moonrockmushy said:

Yeah I think horses are treated better than cows in general, they eat grass and grain not corn and processed/fermented grain.

---

cows eat grass too

---

Doubt the ones that go in BK burgers do.

---

it would cost around $8000 to buy a cow that's been fed nothing but grains it's
entire life, they eat grass and hay which is usually grass, they're
supplemented with a few pounds of grans and finished on grains and often waste
from shit like sugar beets and soy

---

akira_akuma said:

excellent. it's not important how or why horse meat was introduced to beef meat... but it's important how livestock is treated? sounds like a conflicting interest here.

---

akira_akuma said:

excellent. it's not important how or why horse meat was introduced to beef meat... but it's important how livestock is treated? sounds like a conflicting interest here.

---

moonrockmushy said:

akira_akuma said:

excellent. it's not important how or why horse meat was introduced to beef meat... but it's important how livestock is treated? sounds like a conflicting interest here.

---

Yeah I can agree with what BS is saying.  I think you're too hung up on the horsies, people are just trying to make light of the situation which doesn't mean they agree.  It is a coping mechanism.

---

akira_akuma said:

it's useless to cope with something that you don't agree with.

---

akira_akuma said:

well said, but irrelevant. he still thinks i'm taking about people eating horses and thinking it's good or not, or wahtever. i'm not.

---

I think the three of us are saying about the same thing but finding excuses to argue about the way we phrase it.

sVs said:

Vehemence doesn't mean you're making a coherent statement.
Yelling loudly isn't always the best way to communicate.

---

BlindSophist said:

akira_akuma said:

it's useless to cope with something that you don't agree with.

---

akira_akuma said:

well said, but irrelevant. he still thinks i'm taking about people eating horses and thinking it's good or not, or wahtever. i'm not.

---

I think the three of us are saying about the same thing but finding excuses to argue about the way we phrase it.

---

akira_akuma said:

Quote:

I think the three of us are saying about the same thing but finding excuses to argue about the way we phrase it.

---

probably, but i don't see anybody hounding your posts.

---

moonrockmushy said:

Cows can get away with eating alot "nastier" shit, but because of the cattle industry this has been pushed to the limit.

Why do you think we have mad cow disease or bovine spongiform encephalopathy?  They feed cattle to cattle.  AFAIK you can't get away with that for horses.

---