amilibertine said:

Still waiting on those answers.

---

BooBooKittyFuck said:

amilibertine said:

Still waiting on those answers.

---

Your gonna wait for a long time unfortunately, He can't give you any answers to back up what he says because these types of crimes will continue to happen. Regardless of "taking the guns away" or "making them illegal" it is still gonna happen, they will just have to find a different weapon.

---

BooBooKittyFuck said:

So Bassfreak this is what you resort to when not everyone agrees with you or prooves points of their own about what they believe??

"if u do not agree then you simply are retarded"



"are u serious?

ur fucking stupid

case closed"



"you are so incredibly fucking dense"

"guns are more dnagerous than swords, if u disagree then ur fucking retarded"


And who is the one crying? Mister wah wah "you brought religion into this" , wah wah "I hate people like you" LMFAO , I have yet to understand "dnagerous" and "goota"

---

BooBooKittyFuck said:

Nope, those are all from this thread. I commented on the first page if you didn't noticed, so of course I read the whole thing and seen nothing but "dumb/stupid/ignorant/dense". You literally have to be at the very most 14. If you are older than you should be ashamed. The way you speak and the way you speak to others is disgusting.
And I'm not "dude"

---

LOL

whatever helps you sleep at night then!

starfire_xes said:

I say we need not only gun control, but kitchen knife control, baseball bat control, truncheon control, iron bar control, big piece of rock control, num-chuk control, bo staff control, straight razor control.....

---

LOL, right. And not like they don't control alot of things but people still get them. Hell when they started "controling" sudafed and such did they really think it would work? My mother in law used to make meth and she would just have a bunch of people go to diff stores and buy/steal whatever they could. Same with the matches and the denatured alcohol. So them "controling things" don't mean jack. NTM if a person really wanted a gun, it's called the internet, make one.

BooBooKittyFuck said:

starfire_xes said:

I say we need not only gun control, but kitchen knife control, baseball bat control, truncheon control, iron bar control, big piece of rock control, num-chuk control, bo staff control, straight razor control.....

---

LOL, right. And not like they don't control alot of things but people still get them. Hell when they started "controling" sudafed and such did they really think it would work? My mother in law used to make meth and she would just have a bunch of people go to diff stores and buy/steal whatever they could. Same with the matches and the denatured alcohol. So them "controling things" don't mean jack. NTM if a person really wanted a gun, it's called the internet, make one.

---

JoieDeVivre said:

Holy shit I agree with bassfreak?

JesusIsLord said:

completely agree with you OP.


worst part is - HERE COMES THE DAMN GUN CONTROL DUMBASSES THAT THINK MAKING FIREARMS ILLEGAL WILL SOLVE JACK FUCKING SHIT

---

*sigh* I don't know why this is so hard to understand:

Gun control =/=  making firearms illegal.

---

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

What part of that is so fucking hard to understand.

amilibertine said:

I wish some of these gun control people could answer my simple questions.

How would it work?

How would it prevent people from getting their hands on guns?

How would it stop murderers from murdering people?

How would it get rid of the millions and millions of guns already in the country?

How would it stop anyone from doing anything?


Please, I'm desperate to understand how you people think this will/would work?

---

that's the problem. they don't think, they live in some fucking fantasy utopia where "perception is reality" and think because they took 2 years of sociology classes at the local U they are qualified to tell everyone how the world works and how they should live their lives.

JesusIsLord said:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

What part of that is so fucking hard to understand.

---

A well regulated militia. REGULATION. Gun control is regulation. A well regulated militia doesn't mean every paranoid fucker owning his own assault rifle. It looks like you are lacking in understanding.

amilibertine said:

I wish some of these gun control people could answer my simple questions.

How would it work?

How would it prevent people from getting their hands on guns?

How would it stop murderers from murdering people?

How would it get rid of the millions and millions of guns already in the country?

How would it stop anyone from doing anything?


Please, I'm desperate to understand how you people think this will/would work?

---

JoieDeVivre said:

JesusIsLord said:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

What part of that is so fucking hard to understand.

---

A well regulated militia. REGULATION. Gun control is regulation. A well regulated militia doesn't mean every paranoid fucker owning his own assault rifle. It looks like you are lacking in understanding.

---

JesusIsLord said:

A regulated militia as in an ORGANIZED militia. I'm done with this, a child could understand this but you are too absorbed in the libtard drum circle idiocy to understand how freedom works. You even take for granted that people who are armed are what keep you from being harmed or possibly killed like police, retired vets, military, and citizens exercising their rights and responsibilities to defend their own lives.

---

You're putting words in my mouth so that you can justify calling me a libtard. You're too absorbed in your own perspectives to consider anything else. They didn't mean organized, they chose all their language very carefully and the word regulated was intentional. I'm not taking anything for granted and I don't want any freedoms taken away, you incompetent ass. I've said this whole thread that all I want is safety measures to protect innocent people and keep guns in the hands of their rightful owners rather than in the hands of bloodthirsty psychopaths. Why is that so controversial?

amilibertine said:

BooBooKittyFuck said:

starfire_xes said:

I say we need not only gun control, but kitchen knife control, baseball bat control, truncheon control, iron bar control, big piece of rock control, num-chuk control, bo staff control, straight razor control.....

---

LOL, right. And not like they don't control alot of things but people still get them. Hell when they started "controling" sudafed and such did they really think it would work? My mother in law used to make meth and she would just have a bunch of people go to diff stores and buy/steal whatever they could. Same with the matches and the denatured alcohol. So them "controling things" don't mean jack. NTM if a person really wanted a gun, it's called the internet, make one.

---

Sarcasm.  Yep.  You're arguing with someone who agrees with you.

---

Noooo I wasn't arguing! I was agreeing lol Sorry if it came off the wrong way :/

JoieDeVivre said:

amilibertine said:

I wish some of these gun control people could answer my simple questions.

How would it work?

How would it prevent people from getting their hands on guns?

How would it stop murderers from murdering people?

How would it get rid of the millions and millions of guns already in the country?

How would it stop anyone from doing anything?


Please, I'm desperate to understand how you people think this will/would work?

---

How would it work? Identity confirming technology on guns to ensure only the registered owner can fire them. That would prevent people from getting unregistered firearms in the future. Tracking devices placed in guns so that any stolen/ black market guns are easily locatable. It wouldn't stop all murders of course, no one claims that. We don't need to get rid of the millions of guns in the country but we could require regular check ups for gun owners to ensure that they are still mentally stable, still keep track of their own firearms and all old firearms could have these newer technologies installed in them.

Gun control makes sense and is already in place. Requiring registration is gun control.

---

JoieDeVivre said:

JesusIsLord said:

A regulated militia as in an ORGANIZED militia. I'm done with this, a child could understand this but you are too absorbed in the libtard drum circle idiocy to understand how freedom works. You even take for granted that people who are armed are what keep you from being harmed or possibly killed like police, retired vets, military, and citizens exercising their rights and responsibilities to defend their own lives.

---

You're putting words in my mouth so that you can justify calling me a libtard. You're too absorbed in your own perspectives to consider anything else. They didn't mean organized, they chose all their language very carefully and the word regulated was intentional. I'm not taking anything for granted and I don't want any freedoms taken away, you incompetent ass. I've said this whole thread that all I want is safety measures to protect innocent people and keep guns in the hands of their rightful owners rather than in the hands of bloodthirsty psychopaths. Why is that so controversial?

---