Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]
U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks
    #13585131 -

Washington (CNN) -- Unauthorized federal workers and contractors have been warned not to attempt to read the classified documents on WikiLeaks on either government or personal computers.

The White House Office of Management and Budget sent a memo Friday afternoon forbidding unauthorized federal government employees and contractors from accessing classified documents publicly available on WikiLeaks and other websites using computers or devices like BlackBerrys and smart phones.

The memo, sent to general counsels at various government agencies and obtained by CNN, explains that the publishing by WikiLeaks does "not alter the documents' classified status or automatically result in declassification of the documents."

"To the contrary, classified information, whether or not already posted on public websites or disclosed to the media remains classified, and must be treated as such by federal employees and contractors, until it is declassified by an appropriate U.S. Government authority," the memo said.

The memo does allow for reading of articles about the cables on media sites.

OMB spokesperson Moira Mack said the memo "does not advise agencies to block WikiLeaks or other websites on government computer systems."

"This is principally about protecting government IT systems," Mack said.

She described the memo as a template for agencies to use as guidance, saying it "restates and reinforces existing restrictions on access to classified documents by unauthorized personnel or on computers that access the web via non-classified government systems."

Asked if employees could lose their jobs if they access the WikiLeaks website on personal or government computers or devices, Mack told CNN, "Any breaches of protocols governing access to classified material are subject to applicable sanctions under long-standing and existing law."

The State Department sent a warning to staff not to confirm the authenticity of any published documents and to refer all inquiries to the public affairs office.

"The department is reviewing the material that has been made public. We take reports of the deliberate and unauthorized disclosure of classified material very seriously," according to a copy of the memo obtained by CNN. "The security and safekeeping of classified material and the safety of State Department personnel are our highest priorities."

The State Department memo also reminded the staff that even though they are published, the normal standards for handling classified documents apply when viewed at work or home.

"Any classification markings on the downloaded material should be retained. If such material is printed, however, it must be handled as a classified document and stored in a classified container," the memo said.

Separately, the Department of Defense and the Library of Congress have blocked access to the WikiLeaks website from their computers and instructed their employees not to read the documents published by the website, according to representatives of both agencies.

"We have put out a policy saying Department of Defense military, civilian and contractor personnel should not access the WikiLeaks website to view or download the publicized classified information," Department of Defense spokesman Maj. Chris Perrine told CNN. "Doing so could introduce potentially classified information on unclassified networks. This creates 'spillage' which can result in a great cost of time, manpower and money."

The statement echoes similar language in the Office of Management and Budget memo.

Library of Congress spokesman Matthew Raymond issued a statement saying the library "decided to block WikiLeaks because applicable law obligates federal agencies to protect classified information. Unauthorized disclosures of classified documents do not alter the documents' classified status or automatically result in declassification of the documents."

He said the block applies to patrons working in the library's reading room as well as Library of Congress staff.












And dont forget about Columbia University :smirk:

Oh now see how the truth becomes treason??

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: DeadHearts]
    #13585155 -

Quote:
"We have put out a policy saying Department of Defense military, civilian and contractor personnel should not access the WikiLeaks website to view or download the publicized classified information," Department of Defense spokesman Maj. Chris Perrine told CNN. "Doing so could introduce potentially classified information on unclassified networks. This creates 'spillage' which can result in a great cost of time, manpower and money."




If your cup is leaky... why are you worried about spilling it?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: anarchOi]
    #13585206 -



--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: mellowparty] * 1
    #13585214 -

Don't hate the media. Become the media. Kudos to assange. It makes little difference though. People will rather go home and post on a forum then go out and riot or rebel. The government has a level of control we've never known before whther we like to belive it or not.


--------------------

koods said:
Young male going by the name "Bassfreak" entered Worcester General complaining of a sharp pain in his buttock region after attending EDM event. Attending physician considered a possible diagnosis of acute rave anus, but upon further investigation it was determined there was nothing cute about patient's anus.

Life-long trip report

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: pfxtc]
    #13585226 -

pfxtc said:
Don't hate the media. Become the media. Kudos to assange. It makes little difference though. People will rather go home and post on a forum then go out and riot or rebel. The government has a level of control we've never known before whther we like to belive it or not.



This is true. NO ONE wants to risk themselves or their family or money or
whatever you want to look at. Its going to take something truly monumental
for people to start getting pissed.

Its going to take something happening to our food supply or communications like
the internet for people to truly stand up.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: DeadHearts]
    #13585246 -

Our food supply is beyond contaminated and our communications as this whole leak should prove are already completely filtered. All the news stations are owned by private companies who have ties in the war. 2054 rather then 1984 but I sense orwell had it pretty close.


--------------------

koods said:
Young male going by the name "Bassfreak" entered Worcester General complaining of a sharp pain in his buttock region after attending EDM event. Attending physician considered a possible diagnosis of acute rave anus, but upon further investigation it was determined there was nothing cute about patient's anus.

Life-long trip report

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: pfxtc]
    #13585253 -

pfxtc said:
Our food supply is beyond contaminated and our communications as this whole leak should prove are already completely filtered. All the news stations are owned by private companies who have ties in the war. 2054 rather then 1984 but I sense orwell had it pretty close.



I agree with the rest but how is our food contaminated?? Dont get me wrong
High fucktose is in almost everything and most things you buy are horrible for you.
Just curious....

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: DeadHearts]
    #13585259 -

fluoride, aspartame, im sure there are many other examples.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: Dosile Kouki]
    #13585263 -

DosileFlynn said:
fluoride, aspartame, im sure there are many other examples.



yeah.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: DeadHearts]
    #13585270 -

I just know Im not ready to completely give up my freedoms and run and gun it
by myself to try and make a change. Im no leader I am sad to say. I wish I was
one to rally the people together but I do not think I have the skills necessary.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: DeadHearts]
    #13585279 -

anyone can learn oratorical skills.


--------------------
I close my eyes and seize it
I clench my fists and beat it
I light my torch and burn it
I am the beast I worship....

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: Olympus Mons]
    #13585286 -

I prefer the shadows

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: DeadHearts]
    #13585328 -

WTF?

Isn't that just like saying NWO your either with us or against us?


Yeah its not like their workers have the right to know what corrupt fascists their job is helping support is it, lol.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: nice1]
    #13585355 -

nice1 said:
WTF?

Isn't that just like saying NWO your either with us or against us?


Yeah its not like their workers have the right to know what corrupt fascists their job is helping support is it, lol.



Well they do but they will loose their jobs :shrug: You always have a choice :lol:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: DeadHearts]
    #13585400 -

lol check out the movie Food Inc


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: anarchOi]
    #13585653 -



China Officials Ordered Google Hack After Finding Unflattering Search Results, Cables Show


Comment made on page:

Let's see--Wkile­aks and Assange can release a bunch of second rate 'secrets' and be hunted by our government­, receive death threats etc..

China can hack an AMERICAN COMPANY, and still keep favored trading partner status with no retaliatio­n or legal threats of any kind?"

For real. All this shit is just so fucking retarded im done.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: DeadHearts]
    #13585656 -

what's an unauthorized employee?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #13585658 -

Prisoner#1 said:
what's an unauthorized employee?



I actually do not know. Does not sound like an employee that can do much of anything.
But maybe a typo.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: DeadHearts]
    #13585685 -

When they say Unauthorized Employees they are probably just talking about the
employees that are not authorized to view such files.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: U.S. agencies warn unauthorized employees not to look at WikiLeaks [Re: nice1]
    #13585720 -

I think it is more like saying we are going to stick our heads in the sand and pretend that these documents are for everyone to see...

I'd like to see a more open government that shares information and doesn't have to hide anything.

What is happening at Area 51 anyway?  Is it just an air force test base of some sort or is it a UFO storage and research facility?

Is HIV something that escaped from the lab that was meant to wipe out blacks?

What is the real reason we have a war on Islam in the middle east?

Why is Marijuana illegal and coffee is legal?  What is the real reason?


nice1 said:
WTF?

Isn't that just like saying NWO your either with us or against us?


Yeah its not like their workers have the right to know what corrupt fascists their job is helping support is it, lol.




--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The Document Sean hannity Does not want you to Read mjshroomer 977 7 02/28/06 10:22 PM
by Jadian
* reporting employer to state? everyones thoughts.
( 1 2 all )
rawtoxic 1,993 23 03/01/06 10:46 AM
by Cowgold
* Wikileaks Founder Assange releases 91,000 reports covering the war in Afghanistan from 2004 to 2010
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
DeadHearts 7,742 97 08/02/10 03:22 AM
by Konyap
* The Iraq War Logs (WikiLeaks released the largest classified military leak in history)
( 1 2 all )
snoot 3,459 34 10/28/10 02:35 AM
by pfxtc
* Obama trying to censor WIkileaks
( 1 2 all )
makaveli8x8 2,671 31 11/28/10 09:11 PM
by SillyBilly
* Sweden drops (rape) warrant for WikiLeaks founder Arden 1,003 15 08/21/10 08:10 PM
by blewmeanie
* My encounter with police yesterday, as well as some pictures of fuzzy animals. Big Pic Warning.
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
Liz 9,028 113 01/26/07 09:30 PM
by wazza
* Awful (warning, graphic content)
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Liz 6,534 80 03/22/06 05:37 PM
by inoculatedGreif

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
3,797 topic views. 3 members, 184 guests and 155 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.035 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 18 queries.