weiliiinmyyard said:

the first and second flush are easily twice as potent as all the flushes from seven other substrates from the same spawn.

the experimental substrate was this:

and then 3 parts sand to 2 parts organic potting mix for the casing layer.

the rest were regular coco-coir, and all the spawn was b+ on RGS

you can find calci-sand in the reptile bedding area at the pet store, and add it to your substrates. and i bet its way less likely for your sub to get contams with calci-sand instead of coffee

1st flush


2nd flush


for contrast (from the same syringe)

---

truskool said:

To get a tru experiment you would have to use an iso.  But it still is worth a try the example you should shows the experiment has merit and worth

---

weiliiinmyyard said:

truskool said:

To get a tru experiment you would have to use an iso.  But it still is worth a try the example you should shows the experiment has merit and worth

---

im going to try it again, somebody else should try it too

funny all 7 of the other subs had white stpies and the one controlled sub was different

try it!

how do you take an isolate, i have supplies and fresh shrooms, all kinds of grains for different species too

when people say mycelium water does that mean the syringe has h20 and tissue and thats it?

---

weiliiinmyyard said:

nice tip but i think it works

---

Shea25 said:

weiliiinmyyard said:

nice tip but i think it works

---

This one experiance means nothing unless it was done with a isolate and done a few times to prove it works. The science behind offers no evident to support the fact this will make more potent mushrooms. Your opinion is subjective and not scientific. To state I think it works with zero proof  or real study is a bit hasty. People should not start believing in this just due to 1 time with a MS innoc and its unfair to them to be told this works with no real evidence

---

he said he gonna try it again.

your kinda harsh here bro.

why put him down for trying something and posting what he found to happen?

whyblameus I think your conception of harsh is a bit off. I'm not being mean to him. I'm just offering a scientific explanation. im not putting him down i think its a great idea just needs to be refined I gace him some advice on how to do a proper test.

whyblameus you need to chill out, theres no hostility here at all

My whole response was to him saying

Quote:

i think it works

---

Shea25 said:

The best way to get potent mushrooms is to clone one off a really potent flush and then make up an LC with it.

---

Shea25 said:

whyblameus I think your conception of harsh is a bit off. I'm not being mean to him. I'm just offering a scientific explanation. im not putting him down i think its a great idea just needs to be refined I gace him some advice on how to do a proper test.

whyblameus you need to chill out, theres no hostility here at all

My whole response was to him saying

Quote:

i think it works

---

I hope we all can do more experimenting like this its great

My intention was not to come off "harsh" but to offer a opinion on how to PROVE this theory, 

---

whyblameus said:

Shea25 said:

The best way to get potent mushrooms is to clone one off a really potent flush and then make up an LC with it.

---

the best way to get potent mushrooms is to make a bunch of isolates then fruit them and keep the most potent iso.

most mushroom arent enough to know how potent the are with just one so you would have to grow the clone and test that.
and if its not that potent then you have to start over.

doing isolates sounds like a much easier process to me.



sorry to nit pic you posts here but if you want people to be completely accurate you should yourself.
i know you know a lot much more then me i just thought you were rude.

---