Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   MagicBag.co Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag   Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates, CBD Oils

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Anonymous

Re: HUGE FUCKING SHROOM!(pics)
    #76412 - 06/26/00 12:05 PM (24 years, 6 months ago)

I'm guessing either~Agaricus abruptibulbus~
Wich fruits in eastern canada and the us summer through fall in soil under hard woods or it may be ~Agaricus sylvicola~ wich friuts late spring to fall in soil in coniferous and hardwood forests.

(damn my spelling.. lol)

[This message has been edited by Charles (edited June 26, 2000).]


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblemjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
Re: HUGE FUCKING SHROOM!(pics)
    #76414 - 06/26/00 12:08 PM (24 years, 6 months ago)

Looks like Agaricus arvensis

mj


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: HUGE FUCKING SHROOM!(pics)
    #76415 - 06/26/00 12:14 PM (24 years, 6 months ago)

my god mj I think your right.. I let that one slip bye me.. lol sholud have thought about the size b4 I posted..

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: HUGE FUCKING SHROOM!(pics)
    #76416 - 06/26/00 12:19 PM (24 years, 6 months ago)

Edible?

aooops, nevermind answered my own question:

Edibility
Excellent, though not as meaty as Agaricus augustus or A. bitorquis

[This message has been edited by tekniq (edited June 26, 2000).]


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: HUGE FUCKING SHROOM!(pics)
    #76417 - 06/26/00 12:28 PM (24 years, 6 months ago)

Yes, but if it is ~Agaricus sylvicola~ wich I doubt it is now you sholud avoid it. It has been known to cause some cases of poisining but if its ~Agaricus arvensis~ then yes eat up.. :smile: But you sholud always be catutious when eating yellow staining Agaricus becuse of the posibilty of confusing it with A.sylvicola

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAzure
old hand
Registered: 12/31/98
Posts: 469
Loc: California, USA
Last seen: 22 years, 8 months
Re: HUGE FUCKING SHROOM!(pics)
    #76418 - 06/28/00 04:27 PM (24 years, 6 months ago)

If it smells foul when fresh, don't eat it (obviously).

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   MagicBag.co Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag   Bridgetown Botanicals CBD Concentrates, CBD Oils


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Huge Destroying Angels (pics) Gumby 1,126 2 09/12/01 04:36 PM
by Gumby
* Hay/Compost Shrooms(pic) TripWizard 2,097 6 10/06/02 02:50 AM
by TripWizard
* Identify this shroom, PICS Kane1484 1,892 4 07/02/01 06:16 AM
by auto59009
* Re: Some more wild shroom pics anandam 2,775 6 12/18/99 03:21 PM
by azurescen
* A cool shroom pic of mine at hightimes.com! GGreatOne234 1,511 3 09/26/01 11:25 AM
by Levi7
* Are these shrooms? (PICS)
( 1 2 all )
JeeLiX 4,571 24 09/09/08 01:48 PM
by Alan Rockefeller
* help with id these shrooms (pics)!!!1 tranced2 2,377 13 07/09/02 03:45 PM
by Anonymous
* can someone please id these shrooms(pics) pash420 2,433 8 08/03/01 06:55 PM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, karode13, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout
1,282 topic views. 0 members, 9 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2025 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 13 queries.