They also do not resemble P/ subaeruginosa, however, as i noted above, they have a color problem in the printinng of that page you posted, thus making an identification almost impossible.

mjshroomer

P.s. I take it that is the book you offered to trade to me for one of mine?

perhaps not

but them i find it difficult to account for my experience two years ago when i ate 5
walked into the woods and spent the next four hours curled up experiencing outrageous visuals and an inner voice announcing itself as the missing logos
now making itself known to me
(or more truthfully i to it)

an experience of power i could barely comprehend and certainly felt to be the most important of my life

and thinking why bother with lsd anymore
y'know

complete with naked hippy chick in hotpool coming down?

mjshroomer: sure the colors aren't perfect: probably a little light
but i had the real things to compare last week
and thought
"oh yes, same-same alright"

and i dont believe your story heheheh

but i've got a good camera
& will try for more pics this season

q: you said that p.subaeruginosa
which grows on bark
has been found on dung
has it ever been known for a dung-growing variety
to naturalise itself to soily conditions?

& yes, i got that copy of the book for you
and will post hopefully this week

To me, the look like LBM's with shiney (photoshop) enhancements done on the caps.

Main reason I suspect that they are not magic, is from looking at the stems.. little Brown boring shaped stems.

-and your story about the hot little hippie chick in the hot tub amuses me