Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Chantrelle? or not...
    #6784506 -

I found these last fall in northern Illinois among some hardwood trees (I think it's growing by either an oak or a hickory tree, which is alive not a stump). I was hoping they might be Chantrelles (cantharellus cibarius) but further comparison seems to point toward Jack-O-Lantern (omphalotus olivascens), aka the false chantrelle. I did not know to check at the time for any luminescence which would be another indicator that they are the toxic lookalike. There were quite a few little colonies around other trees in the area as well, and some slime and jelly and brain types of fungus also.



Anyway, I'm sure they will be back again this year and if anyone wants a specimen or spores, etc, I would love to collect and send for postage.


--------------------
Anywhere in this posting where I have referred to myself or my possessions, it is a personalization of events and items experienced or possessed by someone else.  I do not personally do anything illegal, and I hope nobody else does either.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: Spudz76]
    #6784546 -

Could be but I'd wait for a more experienced chantrelle hunter. BEAUTIFUL pictures tho.


--------------------
"Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war that we know about peace, more about killing that we know about living."

General Omar N. Bradley

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: 2FiNiTe]
    #6784570 -

Armillaria . edible, but i've never tried them. chanties do look similar so keep looking. tip-they wont be growing in clusters at the base of trees.you're more likely to find them scattered among oaks a few feet from the base


--------------------
Wreck yourself before you check yourself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: Spudz76]
    #6784572 -

at first glance they look more like jack-o-lanterns, not chantrelles.
They are growing too clustered and look to orange, and the cap doesn't "cup up" as most chantrelles I've seen do.:shrug:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: burtonRebel]
    #6784645 -

they are not armillaria,you just told him a poisoness mushroom was edible.they aint chanterelles either.look like jacks ,says me.

Edited by coon (04/13/07 08:14 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: California]
    #6784653 -

they are honey mushrooms not jack o lanterns.

the key in telling Armillaria apart from chanterelle are the gills.

those Armillaria grow like crazy here in the fall, i've seen hundreds of colonies in a single day

chanterelle:







--------------------
Wreck yourself before you check yourself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: Spudz76]
    #6784655 -

Jack - o - Lanterns, I'm nearly 100% sure.  I am definitely 100% sure they are not chanterelles (which never grow directly from wood), and also 100% sure they are not armillaria (which they look nothing like).  BurtonRebel - please don't give IDs that you are not 100% sure of.  As Coon said, you just told someone a very poisonous mushroom was edible. :frown:  If you are going to give an ID that you are not 100% sure of, tell the person you are not completely sure, and try to be cautious.

Edited by xmush (04/13/07 08:18 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: burtonRebel]
    #6784662 -

they are omphalatus.but believe what u want.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: coon]
    #6784672 -

Yes, omphalatus. They look nothing like honeys. Burton, I'm starting to think that you are a Jack-O-Ass.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: burtonRebel]
    #6784682 -

o shit, im having 2nd thoughts about my id
listen to the others


--------------------
Wreck yourself before you check yourself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: burtonRebel]
    #6784692 -

wow thanks xmush, always nice to hear from a fan


--------------------
Wreck yourself before you check yourself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: Spudz76]
    #6784697 -

As several people have stated, those are Omphalotus, commonly known as Jack O'Lanterns. They are poisonous and should not be eaten. Interestingly, fresh specimens glow in the dark.

Spudz76, there have been lots of poisonings from people mistaking those for Chanterelles, so you're not alone in your guess. The easiest way to tell the difference is that Chanterelles grow on the ground and Jack O'Lanterns grow from wood. Another is that Jack O'Lanterns have gills, but Chanterelles have blunt ridges instead of true gills.

Happy mushrooming!


--------------------
Happy mushrooming!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: burtonRebel]
    #6784701 -

LOL.  Sorry burton, I take that back now that you've rescinded your ID.  Plus the temptation to call someone a Jack-O-Ass when we were talking about Jack-O-Lanterns was too much! :wink: We all make mistakes here, I've been making tons lately.  The important thing is admitting it when new evidence shows that you are wrong.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: burtonRebel]
    #6784709 -

glad you didnt eat any honey mushrooms last fall.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: xmush]
    #6784734 -

yeah i thought jack-o-ass was pretty clever lol


allllll gravy  :smile:


--------------------
Wreck yourself before you check yourself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: coon]
    #6784759 -



haha i dont plan on trying honeys or jack-o-lanterns anytime soon


--------------------
Wreck yourself before you check yourself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: burtonRebel]
    #6784838 -

Those are jack o'lanterns they contain gastrointestinal irritants and some say they contain muscarine. To any extent the gills glow in the dark and should never be eaten.


Word for the wise, chants never grow on/from wood.


--------------------



I am incapable of conceiving infinity, and yet I do not accept finity.
- Simone de Beauvoir -

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: burtonRebel]
    #6784842 -

Those mushrooms look cool what are they? I have never seen such big mushrooms in big clusters


--------------------
Looks like we are in mushroom country.

Peace
jon

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: snoot]
    #6784853 -

the jacks burn going down.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Chantrelle? or not... [Re: discomfort]
    #6784895 -

I will certainly go look for the glow this fall when they come back, maybe try my hand at some extended exposure pics. Even with this old Canon digital I have had good luck getting things like a faintly glowing Aurora Borealis on the 30 second exposure mode. Showed 10x more brightness than my eyes could even see, though grainy compared to what you might get with good old film and a super extended exposure. There was some light pollution where I did those which didn't help quality though so I'm curious what a rock steady and totally black surrounding environment would turn out. Oh, and the aurora moves quite a bit in 30 seconds whereas these most likely won't.

Thanks for the confirmation of Jack-O-Lanterns. It will be fun to show a few people if they end up glowing nice.


--------------------
Anywhere in this posting where I have referred to myself or my possessions, it is a personalization of events and items experienced or possessed by someone else.  I do not personally do anything illegal, and I hope nobody else does either.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]

Shop: Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Chanterelles or Jack O'Lantern DreamRoom 1,660 9 10/03/09 08:53 AM
by HerbBaker
* Distinguishing between Chanterelles & Jack 'o' Laterns; drama 18,698 12 07/29/09 06:46 AM
by drama
* Big chantrelle and Psilocybe?
( 1 2 all )
shroom360 3,490 20 11/30/09 01:15 PM
by fliped
* Possible chanterelle and a Polyporus radicatus? psylobe1001 7,722 18 07/26/09 02:23 PM
by Alan Rockefeller
* chantrells???? or jacko-lantern? isaac_bonfield 1,158 7 08/02/09 08:00 PM
by crazyboy25
* Please ID. False Chantrelle? Jack O'lantern? Smarty Pants 3,592 3 10/21/09 11:53 PM
by Alan Rockefeller
* jack-o-lantern in san diego county, ca caricapapaya 1,022 6 12/02/08 11:35 PM
by Shroominit
* Chanterelle's or Jacks or ? Renee48192 1,579 11 08/11/09 08:20 AM
by lqdtrance

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, karode13, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout
6,082 topic views. 0 members, 78 guests and 19 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.024 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 16 queries.