Home | Community | Message Board

Kratom Eye
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]
while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have?
    #6415531 -

flash back to the nuclear pissing contest that was the cold war.

Think for a moment, have you ever played poker? have you ever bluffed a hand, went all in with a pair of 2's?

According to wikipedia these are some of the relevant numbers regarding the usa nuclear stockpile and history

Quote:
Nuclear program start date: October 21, 1939
First nuclear weapon test: July 16, 1945
First fusion weapon test: November 1, 1952
Last nuclear test: September 23, 1992
Largest yield test: 15 Mt (October 31, 1954)
Total tests: 1,054 detonations
Peak stockpile: 32,193 warheads (1966)
Current stockpile: 5,735 active, 9,960 total
Maximum missile range: 13,000 km/8,100 mi (land)
7,400 km/4,600 mi (sub)
NPT signatory: Yes (1968, one of five recognized powers)




the concept of Mutually assured destruction (MAD) is clearly based on the fact that there would be no winner in a nuclear exchange between the usa and rusia. Both sides would be destroyed as they were equal powers.

Now, you tell me....

If either side was faced with the possibilty of no longer being able to equally retailiate against the opposing country, dont you think that they would at the very least lie, fib, or otherwise bluff to save themselves?

I for one do, and propose the concept that the above listed numbers are embelished, to what extent i do not know.


--------------------
PEACE

:mushroom2:zippoz:mushroom2:



"in times of widespread chaos and confusion, it has been the duty of more advanced human beings - artists, scientists, clowns, and philosophers - to create order. In such times as ours however, when there is too much order, too much m management, too much programming and control, it becomes the duty of superior men and women and women to fling their favorite monkey wrenches into the machinery. To relieve the repression of the human spirit, they must sow doubt and disruption"

"People do it every day, they talk to themselves ... they see themselves as they'd like to be, they don't have the courage you have, to just run with it."

Edited by zippoz (01/01/07 03:23 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: ZippoZ]
    #6415608 -

i thought 10% of are arsenal was enough to ensure world wide nuclear winter. So the other 90% was just 'icing on the cake'.

The real question is how much do we spend to upkeep these weapons, and under what circumstance would we actually use them?


Im guessing a lot of money, and we will never use them, unless someone else launches all there ICBM at us.

Even if a terrorist set off a nuke in the heart of one of our cities, i still dont see us nuking someone. Terrorist have no nation.


--------------------
Uncleluke, getting his assbeat, then he tries to delete it
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/6355469#Post6355469
Tomato-Faced Banez
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/5933438#Post5933438
Dexter's Thesaurus
beer = guinness
smoke = vaporize
pubers = reasons to be pro-choice

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Dexter_Morgan]
    #6415620 -

ShroomDr said:
The real question is how much do we spend to upkeep these weapons, and under what circumstance would we actually use them?



depends, are you just talking about having some guy that comes in and polishes the rocket, or the full blown staff and supplies

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #6415637 -

Full blown staff, from nuclear experts to ICBM experts, to janitor to clean up. At the THOUSANDS of missile silos.


--------------------
Uncleluke, getting his assbeat, then he tries to delete it
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/6355469#Post6355469
Tomato-Faced Banez
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/5933438#Post5933438
Dexter's Thesaurus
beer = guinness
smoke = vaporize
pubers = reasons to be pro-choice

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: ZippoZ]
    #6415642 -

Who cares how many we have? The fact that any nation has them is scary in the first place.


--------------------
Every mistake, intentional or otherwise, in the above post, is the fault of the reader.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: ZippoZ]
    #6415650 -

10,00 from what I hear, but not all those are active warheads. We here in Canada, have none, and not to be corny, I am REALLY proud of that, we dont need them, and we dont want them, I would love to see a Canadian politician advocate arming Canada with nukes,  talk about political suicide :lol: :smile:


--------------------

Edited by Psilocybeingzz (01/01/07 04:10 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Dexter_Morgan]
    #6415659 -

ShroomDr said:
Full blown staff




I always wanted to be a rocket polisher

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Dexter_Morgan]
    #6415676 -

Quote:
The real question is how much do we spend to upkeep these weapons, and under what circumstance would we actually use them?




Plenty of scenarios. You should remember that the nukes are intended to defend the US Government, not its people.

The US is developing nuclear "bunker busters" and a few years ago the Senate discussed actual deployment of nuclear weapons in future conflicts. There are many uses for nuclear weapons that are strategically interesting, such as the possibility of a high altitude nuclear explosion to destroy all electronics in a large region.

Use of a nuclear weapon also has a great psychological effect which can be considered useful.

Quote:
and we will never use them, unless someone else launches all there ICBM at us.



I think the chance that the US will launch a nuclear first strike against some poor backwater country or terrorist camp is about as great as the chance they won't use the Bomb.

The US Gov't is becoming increasingly rabid. Unless you, the people, turn the tide nukes will eventually be used.

Quote:
Even if a terrorist set off a nuke in the heart of one of our cities, i still dont see us nuking someone. Terrorist have no nation.



Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction, and yet the nation of Iraq is completely torn to shreds by the US Gov't who still are convinced that God's Holy Truth is with them.

I hate to break it to you but the US Government is the bad guy.


--------------------
Omnicyclion.org
personal empowerment for the world

Onehomemission.org
truly make a difference

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Asante]
    #6415693 -

US Government sucks. Unfortunately it doesn't listen to its people anymore, and gets around that through various forms of corruption. Look at all the people Bush put into office without even having to go through the senate or the house!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Asante]
    #6415701 -

omg, the us government is the bad guy?!!?!!?? what a shocker :shocked: wait, no....

its past the point of no return,
we as a society are far to comfortable to actually revolt and change anyhing

the power we are told we have is a vote between 2 corrupt political parties.

and yes, EMP's are very interesting, a nice side effect of nuclear weapons. However, they have discovered how to create EMP blasts without nuclear ordinance.

it was covered indepth by popular mechanics or science (i dont recall which...) but it was a good article, theres also a post about it in sci and tech somewhere...


--------------------
PEACE

:mushroom2:zippoz:mushroom2:



"in times of widespread chaos and confusion, it has been the duty of more advanced human beings - artists, scientists, clowns, and philosophers - to create order. In such times as ours however, when there is too much order, too much m management, too much programming and control, it becomes the duty of superior men and women and women to fling their favorite monkey wrenches into the machinery. To relieve the repression of the human spirit, they must sow doubt and disruption"

"People do it every day, they talk to themselves ... they see themselves as they'd like to be, they don't have the courage you have, to just run with it."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Asante]
    #6415702 -

Wiccan_Seeker said:
There are many uses for nuclear weapons that are strategically interesting, such as the possibility of a high altitude nuclear explosion to destroy all electronics in a large region.




electromagnetic pulse generators are in operation already, the army was developing HALO more than 20 years ago

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #6415709 -

But I don't think there is a non-nuclear way to do this to thousands of square miles in one go.


--------------------
Omnicyclion.org
personal empowerment for the world

Onehomemission.org
truly make a difference

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #6415713 -

Lets start the revolution! Who is with?


--------------------
R.I.P Rod Beck

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: robbyberto]
    #6415714 -

Quote:
Lets start the revolution! Who is with?




*crickets chirp*

*tumbleweed rolls by*

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #6415718 -

Prisoner#1 said:
ShroomDr said:
Full blown staff




I always wanted to be a rocket polisher




--------------------

"All mushrooms are edible; but some only once." Croatian proverb. BTW ...
  Have You Rated Ythans Mom Yet ?? ... :taser:  ... HERE'S HOW ... (be nice) .  :mod: ... :peace:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Asante]
    #6415726 -

Wiccan_Seeker said:
Quote:
Lets start the revolution! Who is with?




*crickets chirp*

*tumbleweed rolls by*




:lol:


--------------------
Every mistake, intentional or otherwise, in the above post, is the fault of the reader.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Asante]
    #6415755 -

Wiccan_Seeker said:
But I don't think there is a non-nuclear way to do this to thousands of square miles in one go.



interesting question here....

how large is the EMP blast from a nuclear weapon?

is it directly proportional to the yeild of the blast? or are certain types of detonations yeild larger emp's?

funny thing. a while back i read my cellphone insurance agreement. Damage from electromagnetic pulses, specifically those that derive from nuclear blasts, are not covered.... lol... what a world.


--------------------
PEACE

:mushroom2:zippoz:mushroom2:



"in times of widespread chaos and confusion, it has been the duty of more advanced human beings - artists, scientists, clowns, and philosophers - to create order. In such times as ours however, when there is too much order, too much m management, too much programming and control, it becomes the duty of superior men and women and women to fling their favorite monkey wrenches into the machinery. To relieve the repression of the human spirit, they must sow doubt and disruption"

"People do it every day, they talk to themselves ... they see themselves as they'd like to be, they don't have the courage you have, to just run with it."

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Asante]
    #6415762 -

Wiccan_Seeker said:
But I don't think there is a non-nuclear way to do this to thousands of square miles in one go.



HALO works on a reasonably large area, plus it's portable, can be flown in a plane
over a target area and will eliminate communications of any sort without
destroying infrastructure... strategicly it's th more viable option

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: robbyberto]
    #6415772 -

robbyberto said:
Lets start the revolution! Who is with?



Iranada of course


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: while were on the topic of government deception, how many nukes do you think that we REALLY have [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #6415792 -

What about Dumbfuckistan?? :wink:  Below Iranada.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 |  [ show all ]


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* What if the terrorists Bombed with acid missles. 2Experimental 2,241 15 12/03/08 11:00 PM
by Crasher
* "Mini Nukes" LSDempire 477 5 04/29/05 11:49 AM
by OneMoreRobot3021
* why does the shroomery hate the US Government?
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Anonymous 12,003 86 10/03/18 03:46 PM
by Ant89
* The London Islamic Terrorist Bombings - Is This Topic Allowed? dbar 524 2 07/08/05 01:26 AM
by dbar
* Mushroom clouds in utah....government testing? deltron 951 16 11/29/04 03:58 PM
by Vvellum
* HAIRY CHRUSTLEMAS AND A FLAPPY NUDE QUEER!!!! gyrothepyro 2,210 18 01/13/05 08:41 PM
by gyrothepyro
* Whats everybody up to? (Late night thread, Any topic you choose) *DELETED*
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )
THE KRAT BARON 13,385 174 06/26/05 01:54 AM
by Skunk420
* "So what you saying is I owe the government 1400$,soonmore Psilocybeingzz 1,140 9 12/15/03 02:04 AM
by Ekstaza

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
1,837 topic views. 5 members, 311 guests and 177 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.034 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 16 queries.