Thor said:

Please keep this ON TOPIC, this is a discussion about locked thread accountability.

Now back to this, the question has been asked if mods could close a thread and leave a reason but not have it say which mod closed the thread.

How is that for comprimise?

It solves the problem of mods being unfairly attacked for doing their job, it also gives the public the reasons as to why the thread was locked.

---

bi0 said:

if they are following the rules, then they should have nothing to worry about.

---

     

bi0 said:

I just think people in authority should have some balls and own up to their actions.

---

dieslow said:

PLEASE GO TO MUSHROOM CULTIVATION
NOW WHY IS REAITIVE HUMIDITY LOCKED IF YOUR MODS WERE JUST AS SMART WITH THE PERSON WHO POSTED

---

bi0 said:

But you seem to forget that most of the forums only have like 4 moderators. So, it's not like there is any sort of anonymity that you speak of.

By having moderators put their name next to their actions (like anybody should if they have integrity and are following the rules), this would reduce the amount of flack that everyone would get. The criticism would be direct and to the person in charge. If a moderator cannot speak for their actions, then they should not be moderator.

You seem to think that if you hide moderators' names, that no one will complain - I do not see this.

I just think people in authority should have some balls and own up to their actions. I see no reason for keeping it all a secret.

---