Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: Genetic Engineering of Crops and You. [Re: plustax]
    #13840631 -

plustax said:
7 years old people




--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Genetic Engineering of Crops and You. [Re: Humility]
    #13840652 -

WHY HAVE I NOT BEEN TAKEN OVER BY A POD PERSON YET?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Genetic Engineering of Crops and You. [Re: DieCommie]
    #13843713 -

DieCommie said:
Quote:
With that said I am all fore producing and manipulating food to increase yields and resistance to disease.



Humans have been doing this for thousands of years.  Other animals do it too.  Its not as unnatural as some make it seem.





Yep, percisely.


Much of the debate over things involving genetics seems to stem from ignorance or very limited perspective  (i.e. I've never heard anyone besides the vatican who knows dick about cell biology and genetics try and claim 'the moment of conception' defines the begining of a person, yet this is a very popular belief amongst the 'man on the street').


A useful question for things like this, however; is to note that some of it is indeed a false choice.  Since we cannot stop genetic technology and things such as this, then does it really make sense to argue whether we should "allow" it?  Moreover, what justification is there for even speaking of whether to "allow" these technologies?  Who exactly has that right, and what justification is their for the premise that a technology needs some affirmative consent from this "decider" to come into being?

To me, this seems entirely backwards as it is almost universely recognized that you have no right to limit my actions to those you consent to. 

The better question might be:  "Should we attempt to forcefully restrict or stop biotechnology? How could we do that? Which ones and why?"

The later question seems to frame the question much more in line with reality.  When the premises of the discussion don't match reality, you start to get less than useful results (I'd refer back to the catholics and invite those curious to read some of the catechisms on biothecnology and the catholic philosophy underpinning it... quite a stretch, to say the least)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Genetic Engineering of Crops and You. [Re: Joshua]
    #28883760 -

Joshua said:
I am a microbiology student. I know what a plasmid is and I know what tranduction is.

I have to write a paper on biotechnology and food, and want some feedback from you.

Please state your feelings on biotechnology, specifically the introduction of foreign genes into crops such as corn. These genes can code for resistance to herbicides, for toxicity to insect pathogens, and for increased yeild of harvest.

My personal view is one of embracing the forward flow of scientific understanding. I encourage responsible genetic engineering. I like the idea of increased harvests to feed the hungry. I am cautious in saying that I even favour scientific advancement in the face of possible danger to the people.

There have been vaccines that have been mistakes and have actually caused a higher rate of disease in the vaccinated. But...things didn't stop there, a corrected vaccine was produced that saved millions. I think of the whole picture...at least I try. We are here now, and the advancement of technology and of science is now. Sure we take risks when we explore these new areas of understanding, but that to me is the spirit of science.

So..please state your opinion and also state your background of understanding. I, for obvious reasons, may value the opinion of a biologist more than that of a high school dropout. But I also value the opinion of the layperson as the layperson often represents the attitude of the population.

Joshua   





--------------------
πŸ’š:mushroom2:❀️
Kuwumaras
π•»π–—π–”π–›π–Šπ–—π–‡π–˜ 4:23
π•Άπ–Šπ–Šπ–• π–™π–π–ž π–π–Šπ–†π–—π–™ π–œπ–Žπ–™π– 𝖆𝖑𝖑 π–‰π–Žπ–‘π–Žπ–Œπ–Šπ–“π–ˆπ–Š; 𝖋𝖔𝖗 π–”π–šπ–™ 𝖔𝖋 π–Žπ–™ π–†π–—π–Š π–™π–π–Š π–Žπ–˜π–˜π–šπ–Šπ–˜ 𝖔𝖋 π–‘π–Žπ–‹π–Š.

》β–ͺοΈŽβ˜†β™‘
BesideUinThyme *muah
GERONIMO!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Post deleted by Administrator
( 1 2 all )
Alien 4,808 34 07/05/03 10:52 PM
by micro
* The future of biotechnology through genetic engineering jonnyjonjonjon 855 9 03/10/09 10:50 AM
by Mr. Bojangles
* Genetically engineered blood protein (Bio Fuel) LuNaTiX 1,090 6 01/10/08 09:34 AM
by Nephlyte
* Engineering Bacteria to Harvest Light DNKYD 876 1 03/27/07 09:12 PM
by strangladesh
* Genetically modified viruses Gumby 865 6 05/05/08 12:07 AM
by RuNE
* Genetic modification of endangered species Baby_Hitler 1,314 8 05/07/08 09:05 PM
by Baby_Hitler
* Psychoactive Botanical Genetic Modification jonnyjonjonjon 1,307 15 03/12/09 01:48 AM
by zouden
* Radio Wave/Genetics LuNaTiX 948 10 02/20/09 07:41 PM
by zouden

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: trendal, automan, Northerner
3,695 topic views. 0 members, 81 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.06 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 15 queries.