Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Cacti identification? * 1
    #25547340 -

what are these ? found in texas by a friend,









Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Cacti identification? [Re: Tripsten] * 1
    #25547345 -

Polaskia chichipe.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Cacti identification? [Re: Tripsten]
    #25547349 -

also can anyone tell me why the skinnier one has those black spots ? is it ok ?? :frown:
And please, ill be doing my own research of course but how do I grow these and keep them alive? any advice helps ive only ever received cuttings when necessary or ordered them.
and ill cry if a cacti dies on my watch :frown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Cacti identification? [Re: Tangich]
    #25547353 -

are you sure? I don't mean to question you but I cant ind one image tat even looks similar to my images or my real time view of it,

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Cacti identification? [Re: Tripsten]
    #25547394 -

Yeah, pretty sure, they have quite variable appearance. It could possibly be a Stenocereus species, but I don't think so. It's definitely not a Trichocereus.

https://goo.gl/images/JPC22w

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Cacti identification? [Re: Tangich]
    #25547404 -

indeed :frown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Cacti identification? [Re: Tangich] * 1
    #25547768 -

Tangich said:
It's definitely not a Trichocereus.




:whathesaid:


--------------------
IT WAS ALL A DREAM

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Cacti identification? (moved) [Re: Tripsten] * 1
    #25550235 -

This thread was moved from The Psychedelic Experience.

Reason:
Better fit.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Cacti identification? (moved) [Re: psilocybinjunkie]
    #25550532 -

The blackish spots are probably nothing to worry about unless they're mushy. Pretty much any non-green spots or scabs are no problem unless they're unusually soft or smell weird

Don't know the exact ID but for me the first thing that came to mind was polaskia chichipe as well, it's been mistaken for trichocereus many a time. Still a nice cactus though

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Sporeworks.EU Spores for European Microscopy


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Yet another cacti identification request (updated) stvip 1,879 11 05/10/05 02:55 PM
by stvip
* cacti identification Mitchnast 1,727 10 01/14/03 03:13 PM
by felixhigh
* cacti identification kindadank 2,188 5 09/10/03 10:24 PM
by felixhigh
* Cacti 101 learn it/live it/love it !
( 1 2 all )
Corporal Kielbasa 12,831 31 11/09/05 03:35 PM
by Corporal Kielbasa
* ID request - T Pachanoi, Polaskia Chichipe, or other? bluegill 452 3 05/02/18 04:01 PM
by bluegill
* Cactus Identification! FecalDildo 1,259 7 02/12/05 12:26 PM
by M_S_Smith
* Maybe the Best Cacti Book (awaited) ytse 943 2 08/31/05 10:59 AM
by ytse
* Do You Have Hydroponic Cacti? Search59 6,520 17 01/13/13 11:49 AM
by Juke Adro

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Mostly_Harmless, A.k.a
284 topic views. 0 members, 85 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 16 queries.