Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: CookieCrumbs]
    #24287248 -

CookieCrumbs said:
:facepalm:

Yes the dog is evil for being a dog and doing dog things even though almost all the bad dog things can be prevented by a responsible owner.



Lemme ask you this, if I had a pet tiger and the tiger got out and mauled someone would you blame me or the tiger?



There have been cases where the dog has been a family pet for years, have lived with the same children for years and have been perfectly fine, and then suddenly and spontaneously attack or maul one of the children.

How is it the owner's fault in those cases? Are they supposed to be psychic and think their family pet, who has never had any incidence of aggression, would one day maul one of their family members?

In any case, I don't believe vandango's version of the story that the baby was left alone. The baby was only 3 days old, not 3 months old. Very few parents leave a baby that young and newborn all alone. Usually one parent is always watching, or if you two need to eat, you bring the baby to the kitchen area with you. You only leave it alone when it's sleeping, and then you put it in the crib.

A 3 month old baby, sure, I could believe it. But not for a 3 day old.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: CookieCrumbs]
    #24287253 -

CookieCrumbs said:
Crystal G said:
Quote:
There are more than 25 media reports of pit bull attacks on people per week, and one death every 13 days.
By comparison, there are approximately 15 shark attacks on people per year in the United States, with one death every two years.
Pit bull attacks are rarely “dog bites”. Most attacks require hospitalization.
Although they represent only 4.5% of dogs in America, pit bulls killed 64.4% of 360 Americans who died as a result of a dog bite injury between 2005-2015, compared to Rottweilers at 11.4% and German Shepherds at 3.6%.





I just now read how retarded this is. Comparing shark attacks in the US to dog attacks. We don't live sleep eat and walk by sharks every day.
And most sharks large enough to attack a human being tend to prefer not going into the shallows where most people swim and wade.


I hate the media.



I thought that was a retarded comparison too.

But actually, fishermen have been catching some baby Great Whites along the coast of California, like Huntington Pier, where surfers and swimmers go.

I think because of overfishing and pollution, sharks are starting to come in closer and closer to the coast in search of food.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: vandago]
    #24287258 -

vandago said:
Does it bite babies faces if she coughs?



:horrified:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: Crystal G]
    #24287262 -

Crystal G said:
CookieCrumbs said:
:facepalm:

Yes the dog is evil for being a dog and doing dog things even though almost all the bad dog things can be prevented by a responsible owner.



Lemme ask you this, if I had a pet tiger and the tiger got out and mauled someone would you blame me or the tiger?



There have been cases where the dog has been a family pet for years, have lived with the same children for years and have been perfectly fine, and then suddenly and spontaneously attack or maul one of the children.

How is it the owner's fault in those cases? Are they supposed to be psychic and think their family pet, who has never had any incidence of aggression, would one day maul one of their family members?

In any case, I don't believe vandango's version of the story that the baby was left alone. The baby was only 3 days old, not 3 months old. Very few parents leave a baby that young and newborn all alone. Usually one parent is always watching, or if you two need to eat, you bring the baby to the kitchen area with you. You only leave it alone when it's sleeping, and then you put it in the crib.

A 3 month old baby, sure, I could believe it. But not for a 3 day old.



They left it within proximity of a beast without the means to restrain the beast, or protect the baby....even if they were in the room, they handled the situation irresponsibly.  Mt version of the story, is merely speculation from such a crappy article with no details filled with clickbait.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: Crystal G]
    #24287411 -

Crystal G said:
CookieCrumbs said:
Crystal G said:
Quote:
There are more than 25 media reports of pit bull attacks on people per week, and one death every 13 days.
By comparison, there are approximately 15 shark attacks on people per year in the United States, with one death every two years.
Pit bull attacks are rarely “dog bites”. Most attacks require hospitalization.
Although they represent only 4.5% of dogs in America, pit bulls killed 64.4% of 360 Americans who died as a result of a dog bite injury between 2005-2015, compared to Rottweilers at 11.4% and German Shepherds at 3.6%.





I just now read how retarded this is. Comparing shark attacks in the US to dog attacks. We don't live sleep eat and walk by sharks every day.
And most sharks large enough to attack a human being tend to prefer not going into the shallows where most people swim and wade.


I hate the media.



I thought that was a retarded comparison too.

But actually, fishermen have been catching some baby Great Whites along the coast of California, like Huntington Pier, where surfers and swimmers go.

I think because of overfishing and pollution, sharks are starting to come in closer and closer to the coast in search of food.



I believe they are too but baby sharks do not indicate they are hanging out there. Most shark species (most fish for that matter) have their young in shallower water because it is safer from large predators like other sharks.

Alligators or bears would have been a better comparison but... still not exactly fair.


--------------------
          :dancingbear: Free time is the only time :dancingbear:                    :thatsinteresting:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: vandago]
    #24287429 -

vandago said:
I agree that bull dogs and shar peis, and other dogs you have to mutilate so they survive should be banned.

There should also be a limit to how much you can sell a dog for. 

Really anyone registering a dog, should also have to pay to take a week or two of classes on dog training, and what can happen if they are idiots.  You are seeing more aggression from pits, because more idiots get pits. I know a lot of idiots that seek pits out just for status, then are aggressive with them through training, then dump them off somewhere because they can't stand their high energy.  The dog is a high energy dog, but so is a weimaranar, and weimys can be dicks, mine can be a dick...and he's sensitive to environment changes, very.  I keep him secure and I pay close attention to him.  He's never bit any aside from people who just walk into my house when they shouldn't.  One day my landlord showed up and walked right in, didn't knock or announce himself, I had no clue.....my dog went running for the door and bit him in the hand.  I yelled at my landlord for the incident, he knew I had two large dogs.  He deeply apologized and knew he was in the wrong.



weimys can definitely be dicks. We have some at our facility that can't go into group with other dogs at all. Having said that, a fight between a weimy and another dog is not nearly as dangerous as a fight between a pit and another dog. I have to break up dog fights pretty regularly and breaking up pits fighting is fucking scary. i can pull a weimy off another dog and hold him upside down in the air any day of the week. to this point, chihuahuas can be HUGE dicks. but it doesnt matter. their tiny teeth do virtually nothing. you can step on a chihuahua.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: Crystal G]
    #24287459 -

Crystal G said:
CookieCrumbs said:
:facepalm:

Yes the dog is evil for being a dog and doing dog things even though almost all the bad dog things can be prevented by a responsible owner.



Lemme ask you this, if I had a pet tiger and the tiger got out and mauled someone would you blame me or the tiger?



There have been cases where the dog has been a family pet for years, have lived with the same children for years and have been perfectly fine, and then suddenly and spontaneously attack or maul one of the children.

How is it the owner's fault in those cases? Are they supposed to be psychic and think their family pet, who has never had any incidence of aggression, would one day maul one of their family members?

In any case, I don't believe vandango's version of the story that the baby was left alone. The baby was only 3 days old, not 3 months old. Very few parents leave a baby that young and newborn all alone. Usually one parent is always watching, or if you two need to eat, you bring the baby to the kitchen area with you. You only leave it alone when it's sleeping, and then you put it in the crib.

A 3 month old baby, sure, I could believe it. But not for a 3 day old.



No, general child care and pet care should teach people not to have animals of that size, at least, around infants. Though I do forgive people a level of ignorance due to conflicting views. I will say it again most people who have a dog do not understand dog behavior and place human thought and rationality on to an animal. We are prone to do it because it is difficult to imagine a perception that is so much different than our own.

Alot of people believe animals have no feelings, no emotions, and no thoughts. It is actually somewhere in between. They do not have the extent of our feelings or the level of our thought. They view the world through a different lens.

I think a better solution than just labeling and banning breeds every few years is to start enforcing laws against abuse and neglect. Start requiring training and certification. Start public education. Enforce stricter breeding regulations (pit bull attacks have risen in large part because they're being bred so much more.) and hold people accountable for the actions of their pets.


Trained police dogs are normally shepherds, an aggressive breed, but unauthorized attacks by police dogs are extremely rare. It's because they're extremely well trained and monitored and the family that houses the dog understands that it is a dangerous animal that can kill you if you do something to set it off.


So yes. It is the owner's fault. But at the same time I can only blame people so much. There is so much ignorance in the world of today. Media is partially responsible, for seeing things in such black and white contrasts, in the media these dogs are only ONLY ever talked about as being vicious killers or loving companions. It never does what it should do as its primary role in society and inform us about the dangers and how to prevent them.

Useless business.


--------------------
          :dancingbear: Free time is the only time :dancingbear:                    :thatsinteresting:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: CookieCrumbs]
    #24287555 -

Pit bulls are the ugliest fucking mutts on the face of the Earth. Their owners are consistently the biggest morons.  Fact.

The stats don't lie. They are more dangerous breed.  Luckily, they normally maul their stupid ass owners LOL.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: CookieCrumbs]
    #24287561 -

hey man I've known pit bull puppies, adult pit bulls, and those huge mastiffs dogs.  I've never been bitten by these breeds but they play chomping their jaws and being rough.  I don't understand the obsession people have with these breeds like they need to be tough.  What to be tough get a rotwieller or dovermen pincher.  Those dogs aren't going to attack a girl trying to break up a dog fight.  I saw this poor girl on the news who got her cheek severely bitten by a pit bull.  so sad

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: encryptor]
    #24287581 -

People gotta learn to stick a finger in a dogs butt

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: despisedicon]
    #24287602 -

And how many pits have you owned or even played with? Thats kinda like calling all muslins big nosed bearded terrorist without ever meeting 1 or only a couple bad 1s.


--------------------
(when my data is fast play Lemur in chess at chess.com)[ [gradient:#D40B29,#18C418]Any1 expecting a trade from me i havent forgot about you pinky promise, i fr promise shits just shit rt now[/gradient]

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: LemurLemur]
    #24287639 -

Owned: None. I don't make a habit of owning dangerous animals. Why haven't you ever owned a rattle snake? What does the pit in pit bull stand for? Too many people forget the origins of breeds of dogs and that every one throughout history has had a singular job. Time goes by and they want to invite the violet mutts into their home. If you want to do that, more power to you. 

You are comparing dogs to human beings now? Dogs are simple minded creatures. Humans are very complex.

Like I said, the stats don't lie.  Pit bull owners do.  YOU ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE KILLED OR INJURED IN A PIT BULL ATTACK THAN ANY OTHER BREED OF DOG. FACT.

There is no "pit bulls in tutu skirts" that are going to change that.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: despisedicon]
    #24287649 -

Well it depends on how you're looking at those statistics. You are more likely to encounter other breeds and therefore are more likely to be attacked and mauled by any other breed.


If you had the same exposure to a pit bull as to any other breed then you are more likely to get killed by them yes.


--------------------
          :dancingbear: Free time is the only time :dancingbear:                    :thatsinteresting:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: CookieCrumbs]
    #24287681 -

:circlejerk:
"Pit bulls don't kill people owners do"
Is the same as.
"Guns don't kill people do"

So round and round you will go.

If you are saying that pit bulls are potentially no more dangerous than a shitzu you're dragging the debate down, look at the stats.

If your saying that yes they are dangerous but you should be able to have one, I disagree but atleast you have a base.

Personally i don't want to take my family to a place where people have guns or pitbulls, hopefully they are trained and competent but ownership is no guarantee.


--------------------
Just a fool on the hill.

Edited by pineninja (05/01/17 07:22 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: CookieCrumbs]
    #24287689 -

Pit bulls also lead the statistics in random dog attacks. There is no "depends on how you look at it" there. It's staggering, well above any other breed of dog.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: despisedicon]
    #24287731 -

Statistics are bullshit. 99% of them, easily 8.7/12.35 are botched, are a blanket statistic that don't properly portray based on determining factors.  The fact of the matter is mainly pit owners are idiots, my sisters not an idiot though, she maintains a very well kept house, fosters animals until they are adoptable and rehomes them, and soon she will be doing the same with children.

We as humans have in fact painted this breed ugly, so the ugly seek it out.  German shepherds got the same rap.  So did rotts.  Both breeds are used by police as highly trained and useful tools.  In the right set and setting pits are indeed amazing, I have never encountered a mean one in my life, but that's because I avoid idiots who treat their dogs poorly. 

Working in a shelter of course you are going to get bitter, aggressive pits, and they are stronger than some breeds, so if they were trained by a dipshit they wont understand what they are doing is wrong, like any breed.  They aren't born that way though.

I'd again like anyone to show me ANY puppy that is vicious and mean, destructive maybe, aggressive when playing probably, but their intentions are not to kill everything at that age, they are raised to do that.  The breeds here to stay, so the people avoiding them like the plaque are laughable at best. 

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: despisedicon] * 3
    #24287737 -

In percentage of dog attacks in the US.

Again you are less likely to encounter a pit bull though as they make up less than 5% of the dog population in the US.
Therefore you are more likely to get bit by another dog than a pit.


Pit bulls are not more dangerous because of this lock jaw nonsense. They're more dangerous because their instinct, once it has be triggered, is to go for the face or throat and have a quick efficient take down. Going for the legs or limbs of a bull is only going to get you stomped or gored.

But you are right pineninja. It is alot like the guns debate. And like the gun debate almost every single article is going to be firmly for or against and ignore all the fine little details that indicate truth in the grey area.


Quote:
Dog bite “statistics” are based off of media reports found online where pit bull type attacks are proven to be reported thousands of times more often than dog bite stories involving other breeds. Hardly a scientific, objective, or accurate way to collect information and in fact, there is a proven bias and over reporting when it comes to dogs labeled as pit bulls.

This “google-research” is then taken and compared with media reports involving individual, specific dog breeds. Like, a Labrador Retriever.



[...]

Which is why State Farm Insurance, the largest insurance company who collects more data than the U.S. Government and makes policy decisions simply based on risks and underwriting, does not discriminate against this loosely defined group of breeds.
“Decisions are made on a case by case basis for those instances,” State Farm spokeswoman Heather Paul told HuffPost. “Pit bulls in particular are often misidentified when a bite incident occurs, so reliable bite statistics related to the dogs’ breed are unreliable and serve no purpose.”
Neither does the White House, Centers For Disease Control, American Veterinary Medical Association, American Bar Association, ASPCA, American Kennel Club, American Pet Dog Trainers Association, International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants, American Animal Hospital Association, and the list goes on and on...

[...]
The U.S. National Safety Council has collected data on your likelihood of being killed by a dog of any breed, as well as your likelihood of being killed by other risks.

The data is defined and the parameters are clear.

In 2014, the U.S. National Safety Council showed that your chances of dying by a dog bite are 1 in 116,448. That’s just a number though; to put that number into perspective, your chances of dying by legal execution are pretty similar, 1 in 127,717.

You are, in fact, twice as likely to die by a hornet, bee or wasp sting than a dog, 1 in 55,764.




(bees is a somewhat fairer comparison I think)

Keep spewing "facts" and someone is only going to come and deny your "facts" with their "facts"


http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-09-09-1441823703-9937606-Reynoldsburg-thumb.jpg

There is already an article on an anti-dog website countering this one. It is not anti pitbull but just generally anti-dog. It was founded and designed for victims of dog bites. You can't get away from bias.


--------------------
          :dancingbear: Free time is the only time :dancingbear:                    :thatsinteresting:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: CookieCrumbs] * 3
    #24287739 -

Man the position of EVERYONES FUCKING WRONG DAMNIT is generally the best one to have in all debates.

also

Quote:
Maybe more striking is the fact that you are FAR more likely to die from eating a hot dog (choking from inhalation of food) than from being attacked by an actual dog.

Death by a real dog- 1 in 116,448.

Death by a hot dog- 1 in 3,375.



lawl


--------------------
          :dancingbear: Free time is the only time :dancingbear:                    :thatsinteresting:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: CookieCrumbs]
    #24287743 -

I will in fact, take no time to prove my facts, when countering factual nonsense. That is in fact, a fact.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Banning dog breeds ultimate racism [Re: vandago]
    #24287747 -

vandago said:
I'd again like anyone to show me ANY puppy that is vicious and mean



Nobody has made that claim though...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Should i put my dog to sleep?
( 1 2 all )
40oz 5,707 34 04/01/05 01:10 AM
by boO
* I love my dog
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Delyrium 7,793 83 11/20/03 06:54 PM
by Mitchnast
* maybe getting a dog this summer Abudiwa 1,205 19 03/08/05 07:50 PM
by Abudiwa
* Racism in your life and community
( 1 2 all )
Ellis Dee 8,784 36 11/13/02 10:49 AM
by Fred Garvin
* hey, troll in the pub.. get banned!
( 1 2 3 all )
ShroomismM 3,783 55 08/12/05 02:28 PM
by KingOftheThing
* Biggest dog head? PriitK 1,721 5 05/26/05 12:14 AM
by KingOftheThing
* Raped Dogs and The Dog Raping Rapists Who Rape Them
( 1 2 3 all )
Irradiated_Feces 4,280 40 07/29/05 02:57 PM
by thegatewaydrug
* if i see your pitbill IM GOING TO FUCKING SHOOT IT poll
( 1 2 3 4 ... 14 15 )
cinic 10,759 282 05/24/12 08:19 AM
by Johnny Depp

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
4,350 topic views. 7 members, 718 guests and 129 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.042 seconds spending 0.012 seconds on 18 queries.