Home | Community | Message Board

MushroomMan Mycology
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Phluck]
    #2255042 -

It looked like bullshit to me. They kept talking about a lot of different things that really didn't have anything to do with each other, and Marxist Capitalism was the first major clue.

A writing teacher I used to have would love this. I have to pass it along to her... she taught us a similar lesson in grade 12.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Phluck]
    #2255048 -

Brilliant thread, Phluck :smile:

Man I read that and re-read it and was thinking "I gotta enhance my vocabulary for sure if I wanna keep up in this forum now sheesh! dude what the fuck kinda shit is Phluck into these days......."

Ultimately I scrolled down to see if ANYBODY knew what you were talking about - heh turns out I'm not as insane as I had convinced myself for a moment :wink: :smile: Bravo!

Politicians have a very similar way of acting..... they don't necessarily use big words and pretty language, but its like that math thing you were talking about (s,m,t,w...) where in order to get a thumbs up from their perspective, they have a lot of explaining to do


--------------------
Insert an "I think" mentally in front of eveything I say that seems sketchy, because I certainly don't KNOW much. Also; feel free to yell at me.
In addition: SHPONGLE

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Phluck]
    #2255102 -

You are all missing the point. To see what I mean, consider that Lacan uses the term 'precultural theory' to denote not narrative as such, but subnarrative. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a neosemanticist paradigm of reality that includes narrativity as a whole. Besides, everyone knows that structural dematerialism kicks ass.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Phluck]
    #2255147 -

Hehehehe  :lol:

Thank god it was completely meaningless. I read it and re-read it and re-re-read it. It didn't make sense to me, but I thought it was because of my bad English. I read (parts of) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy - Karl Marx... so I was totally  :confused:.

:thumbup: :smile:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Annom]
    #2255635 -

I was just thinking, if I'd left it going for long enough, what kind of meaning would people have derived from it (if anyone had the patience).

I think that's what people have done with things like Nostradamus, and the Bible. They devote their entire lives trying to pull meanings out of these texts, and are able to find things to match their theories. You end up with roundabout explanations about how Nostradamus's words predict recent events, or the whole "Bible Code" fiasco.

This isn't really related to my first point... but it's another important issue.


--------------------
"I have no valid complaint against hustlers. No rational bitch. But the act of selling is repulsive to me. I harbor a secret urge to whack a salesman in the face, crack his teeth and put red bumps around his eyes." -Hunter S Thompson
http://phluck.is-after.us

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Phluck]
    #2255949 -

Too bad you don't have any patience. You ruined endless amounts of potential amusement for yourself and others.


--------------------
Anything stated above is fictional roleplay dialog by the character that is Slapnut Rob, in no way representing the actions or beliefs of the man behind the keys.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Phluck]
    #2255978 -

I'm glad i scrolled down to see what others thought instead of opening a new window and trying to define those BS terms with an online dictionary! Actually, all the words were real, they just werent being put together in a meaningful way.

but I had a feeling the shit was bunk. Usually i see things that are hard to read (like neuroscience research) and I dont get it at first glance, but I am rewarded when I actually try and think about it. This one was like all confusion and no reward. ouch.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Phluck]
    #2257150 -

"They devote their entire lives trying to pull meanings out of these texts, and are able to find things to match their theories."

Yes I think Mckenna did the same kind of thing with his Timewave to explain his perfectly reasonable novelty theory.... he just wanted to get a mathematical map for it but had to go to great lengths to create one heh..

He also addressed though that he feels this kind of extrapolation from nature is something that can indeed self-fulfil itself in reality - he was saying that using things like terot cards and i-ching and rolling dice and flipping coins and stuff with great focus can yeild and result ACTUALLY in the results one is looking for.

But uhh.... that would require all sorts of extra (extra-dimensional?) stuff going on in my opinion so i dunno lol :smile:


--------------------
Insert an "I think" mentally in front of eveything I say that seems sketchy, because I certainly don't KNOW much. Also; feel free to yell at me.
In addition: SHPONGLE

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Strumpling]
    #2258922 -

Strumpling said:
Yes I think Mckenna did the same kind of thing with his Timewave to explain his perfectly reasonable novelty theory.... he just wanted to get a mathematical map for it but had to go to great lengths to create one heh..



I've studied Mckenna extensively and personally had the idea that he *knew* his theory was bunk but he could never find anyone with any kind of expertise to disprove it. I looked at it as an expression of general trends in western society/beliefs(scientific and otherwise)being fulfilled through linguistic intent. ie: his pandoras box wouldnt even be opened by the ones who created it to begin with. Language.

Quote:
He also addressed though that he feels this kind of extrapolation from nature is something that can indeed self-fulfil itself in reality - he was saying that using things like terot cards and i-ching and rolling dice and flipping coins and stuff with great focus can yeild and result ACTUALLY in the results one is looking for.



I've never heared him say anything remotely like this...

I personally don't see how people misinterpret him so much. Every idea he put forth was clear and concise.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Phluck]
    #2258946 -

Thank god I was too lazy to even try to read into that before scrolling on. See, sometime being lazy saves you from meaningless work. :grin:
Peace.


--------------------
:redpanda:
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you

:heartpump: :bunnyhug: :yinyang:

:yinyang: :levitate: :earth: :levitate: :yinyang:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: Phluck]
    #2259149 -

They devote their entire lives trying to pull meanings out of these texts, and are able to find things to match their theories.
e.g. survival of the fittest. you can fit anything under it if you try hard enough

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The point will come later. [Re: lateralus]
    #2259385 -

"I've never heared him say anything remotely like this..."

Well that's nice: I guess you don't remember this - most relevant part of this file is at around 3:40 or so

Oh and I don't think he "knew" that novelty theory was bunk.. I think he just didn't like the attached Timewave much, but totally had faith in Novelty theory.

edit: by the way I don't know how much of his stuff other than general novelty I find very accurate heh other than some of his psychedelic blabber :smile: - regardless he was quite the entertainer :laugh:


--------------------
Insert an "I think" mentally in front of eveything I say that seems sketchy, because I certainly don't KNOW much. Also; feel free to yell at me.
In addition: SHPONGLE

Edited by Strumpling (01/21/04 10:39 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]

Shop: Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Terence McKenna's Timewave Zero Plok 828 3 07/23/05 06:06 PM
by Swami
* novelty theory & sept 11
( 1 2 all )
Agent Cooper 3,574 24 02/27/03 01:22 PM
by Strumpling
* TimeWave Zero tak 850 7 08/09/03 02:08 AM
by dawn of a new day
* timewave software/novelty reports? Xochitl 887 5 12/05/03 10:41 PM
by bumski
* Let's assume for a moment timewave 0(2012) is true 3eyedgod 1,224 8 12/14/02 08:58 AM
by Adamist
* Terence Mckenna's Novelty: What would he say today? Noviseer 2,882 14 02/12/04 03:23 PM
by Strumpling
* timewave theory ilikeeggs 643 6 03/06/06 06:41 AM
by Annom
* Timewave Zero software Metasyn 1,467 2 09/19/05 04:49 PM
by extinguishment

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
1,766 topic views. 0 members, 11 guests and 10 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.029 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 17 queries.