Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

MushroomMan Mycology
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: ]
    #2199935 -

Is there any chance you kids can actually discuss the topic at hand before I lock the thread?
Christ...I feel like a fucking babysitter.


--------------------
"Life has never been weird enough for my liking"

Edited by Rono (12/24/03 03:59 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: Rono]
    #2199957 -

You're a little late seeing as the last post was 3.5 hours ago.

:wink:


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: Rono]
    #2200025 -

I think the Guantanamo Bay prisoners ROCK!!!


--------------------
https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-for-renee-goods-wife-and-son

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: Xlea321]
    #2200443 -

Alex123 said:
Depends if they've commited a crime or not. Attacking devastated stone-age countries like Afghanistan you arn't going to find nice neat columns of men in expensive military uniforms. Does that mean everyone who fights you is a "terrorist"?


What if the "government" of a stone age contry is allowing a known terrorist group to freely operate within it's boarders and refuses to turn over or at least stand aside ( if they can't turn over) after said terrorist commit a crime? Doesn't that make them an accomplice and therby accountable? Don't they in essence join the terrorists in the crime at that point? Besides are you implying that after selling so much heroin to the worls they couldn't afford uniforms. Did the UN even reconize the Taliban as a legitimate government?


--------------------
Be all and you'll be to end all

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Righ [Re: mntlfngrs]
    #2200679 -

At its peak popularity, the Taliban was recognized as the legitimate government of Afghanistan by a whopping three countries out of the one hundred and ninety-one countries in the world. It was not recognized as such by the UN.

By October 2001, there was only one country who recognized it -- Pakistan -- and that was only because they had been asked not to withdraw their recognition in order that a diplomatic channel could be kept open.

pinky


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: mntlfngrs]
    #2200767 -

Most of the known 9/11 terrorists were Saudis not Iraqis nor Afghanis, yet no mention of a possible attack on Saudi Arabia - go figure.


--------------------



The proof is in the pudding.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: Swami]
    #2200778 -

The nationalities matter not. What does matter is where the base of operations is. Not that I find the Saudis totally blameless but Afganistan is where the plot was hatched and the leaders were hanging out.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Rights [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #2200788 -

Dude who supported the taliban in its struggle with the warlords?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Finally - Courts Rule For Guantanamo Bay Prisoners' Righ [Re: luvdemshrooms]
    #2201014 -

hey LDS, who supported the taliban in its struggle with the warlords?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3  [ show all ]

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Human Rights violations at Guantanamo Bay
( 1 2 all )		 Swami 3,383 37 12/20/03 07:05 AM
by mntlfngrs
* Judge Rules Against Patriot Act Provision luvdemshrooms 2,259 16 10/02/04 02:55 PM
by phi1618
* Troops accused of prisoner abuse (warning: images within)
( 1 2 all )		 Edame 3,699 39 05/04/04 12:06 PM
by Baby_Hitler
* Victory for Medical Marijuana Patients in Court! silversoul7 1,310 9 12/19/03 12:55 AM
by silversoul7
* One rule for them Xlea321 640 13 03/24/03 11:22 PM
by GazzBut
* The Point of Prisons enimatpyrt 626 7 12/06/03 05:40 PM
by enimatpyrt
* for alex123: court cases involving the 2nd amendment
( 1 2 3 all )		 Anonymous 7,633 58 01/23/04 04:34 PM
by luvdemshrooms
* Massachusetts court upholds same-sex marriage silversoul7 930 3 02/16/04 05:16 AM
by Innvertigo

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
4,675 topic views. 0 members, 1,068 guests and 14 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.027 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 17 queries.