Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Xlea321]
    #1885426 -

It does not matter. That is what we were told would be found. I don't think anyone expected to find a bunch of missiles loaded up with chemical agents.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: shakta]
    #1885806 -

Do you believe everything George Bush tells you?


--------------------
Don't worry, B. Caapi

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Xlea321]
    #1885825 -

No, not really. What's your point?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: shakta]
    #1885840 -

I don't think anyone expected to find a bunch of missiles loaded up with chemical agents.

So you never expected to find anything even remotely resembling WMD's?  :confused:


--------------------
Don't worry, B. Caapi

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Xlea321]
    #1885862 -

Maybe not your definition of WMDs. I expected they would find chemical and possibly biological agents though. I still think Saddam moved them out of the country. Maybe that Lebanon bit is true.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: shakta]
    #1885874 -

Not my definition. The definition of every expert I've yet read Can you find a single expert who regards a chemical by itself as a WMD? Or is that just your definition?


--------------------
Don't worry, B. Caapi

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Xlea321]
    #1885921 -

I am not arguing this with you yet again. Why can't you understand that chems, and bio, are considered WMDs by most people? Your argument is one of semantics, and it doesn't really matter. I know what we are looking for and so do you.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: shakta]
    #1886700 -

For being such a conservative,you have a very liberal definition of what WMD's are.

Chlorine gas can be extremely deadly. If you consider a few chemicals WMD's then every country in the world must be invaded.


--------------------
People think that if you just say the word "hallucinations" it explains everything you want it to explain and eventually whatever it is you can't explain will just go away.It's just a word,it doesn't explain anything...
Douglas Adams

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: monoamine]
    #1886733 -

Cool, let's invade all the countries run by insane dictators that also have bleach and ammonia in them.


--------------------
https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-for-renee-goods-wife-and-son

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Baby_Hitler]
    #1886742 -

OK,which one of the hundred or so should we start with?


--------------------
People think that if you just say the word "hallucinations" it explains everything you want it to explain and eventually whatever it is you can't explain will just go away.It's just a word,it doesn't explain anything...
Douglas Adams

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: shakta]
    #1887387 -

Why can't you understand that chems, and bio, are considered WMDs by most people?

Because they arn't? Because every expert I have yet found says they arn't?

I presume because many members of the public think you jump off buildings if you take LSD you think that's true too?


--------------------
Don't worry, B. Caapi

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Xlea321]
    #1887646 -

Quote:
What "chemical weapons" do you think fit inside a suitcase?


How about a suitcase containing 25 kg of mercury or depleted uranium? That would be enough material to make several million people sick from chemical poisoning. But only if all of it can be efficiently distributed and deposited into the victims' bodies, of course.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Rhizoid]
    #1887676 -

25 Kg is a lot of depleted uranium,but how the hell would you expose a bunch of people to it? You would have to get within a few feet of it unexposed to get any kind of radiation sickness,and even then you probably wouldn't die from it.Remember Madam Curie? She worked with all kinds of radiactive materials unexposed and it took her years to die from it.

I say we blow up Buttfuckistan because they theorectically have enough arsenic to kill 5000 people.


--------------------
People think that if you just say the word "hallucinations" it explains everything you want it to explain and eventually whatever it is you can't explain will just go away.It's just a word,it doesn't explain anything...
Douglas Adams

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: monoamine]
    #1887744 -

grandmasterfat said:
OK,which one of the hundred or so should we start with?


The easiest ones of course.


--------------------
https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-for-renee-goods-wife-and-son

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: monoamine]
    #1887770 -

Quote:
I say we blow up Buttfuckistan because they theorectically have enough arsenic to kill 5000 people.


What the hell, let's start by bombing Switzerland. They have Lake Geneva, which contains 89 billion cubic meters of water, which is more than enough to drown 8 trillion small babies. The entire world population of small babies could be killed many times over by that water. Talk about mass destruction!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Xlea321]
    #1887848 -

What a surprise to see you disregarding the UN when it suits you Alpo.

I guess their experts are only expert when they agree with you.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Rhizoid]
    #1887951 -

Quote:
What the hell, let's start by bombing Switzerland. They have Lake Geneva, which contains 89 billion cubic meters of water, which is more than enough to drown 8 trillion small babies. The entire world population of small babies could be killed many times over by that water. Talk about mass destruction!



Lol

Guarentee you 7 out of 10 people would back that if Bush proposed it. All he'd have to do is mention 9-11 a few times.





--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month: Wild Things- Another Colored Ink Drawing (A.C.I.D.)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: monoamine]
    #1888821 -

grandmasterfat said:
OK,which one of the hundred or so should we start with?


How 'bout our own?


--------------------


"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."--Voltaire

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: Learyfan]
    #1889705 -

Quote:
What the hell, let's start by bombing Switzerland. They have Lake Geneva, which contains 89 billion cubic meters of water, which is more than enough to drown 8 trillion small babies.



Screw the babies. Do you know how many hypothetical hydrogen bombs they could make with future technology with all that fresh water?


--------------------
People think that if you just say the word "hallucinations" it explains everything you want it to explain and eventually whatever it is you can't explain will just go away.It's just a word,it doesn't explain anything...
Douglas Adams

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bill O'Reilly on WMD's [Re: monoamine]
    #1890104 -

And how many suitcases have those bastards got to put weapons in?

Anywhere with a swimming baths (chlorine) and a luggage shop must be invaded NOW.


--------------------
Don't worry, B. Caapi

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]

General Interest > Political Discussion
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Bill O'Reilly on marijuana
( 1 2 3 4 all )		 LearyfanS 2,878 74 09/05/03 07:05 AM
by luvdemshrooms
* WMD's Found in Iraq!!!!!!!
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 SquattingMarmot 3,891 88 09/08/03 09:46 AM
by st0nedphucker
* Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )		 Xlea321 7,120 106 09/23/03 05:43 PM
by infidelGOD
* o'reilly vs franken part deux afoaf 550 1 07/16/04 09:28 PM
by sir tripsalot
* Bill O'Reilly Interviews Rosie O'Donald mjshroomer 2,029 12 03/28/03 03:44 PM
by mjshroomer
* O'Reilly thinks using your rights may be Treasonous
( 1 2 3 all )		 Swami 5,264 56 08/19/05 01:33 AM
by trick
* Bill O'Reilly: "Bush sucks" Xochitl 2,236 14 02/11/04 01:45 AM
by EchoVortex
* So there were no WMD after all
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 Xlea321 2,885 83 04/09/03 10:21 AM
by grib

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
2,917 topic views. 3 members, 35 guests and 21 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.03 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 18 queries.