Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Why do people look for new chemical elements?
    #16925742 -

Like they spend a decade and invest millions of dollars just so they can get indirect data of the existence of some atom with say 113 protons that exists for less than a billionth of the the second.

Isn't it useless? Whats the point?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: mellowparty]
    #16925766 -

Most things humans do are useless and pointless.  Look at how much is spent on sports.  Not playing sports, just watching others play.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: DieCommie]
    #16925773 -

DieCommie said:
Most things humans do are useless and pointless.  Look at how much is spent on sports.  Not playing sports, just watching others play.



I have never understood sports or people's fascination with watching others play.


--------------------
Yes this is tymo - I just changed my name

Have you ever had a dream that you were so sure was real? What if you were unable to awake from that dream? How would you know the difference between that dream world and the real world?


There is NOTHING better than feeling that warm dissociative fuzz creeping up your body from IM K
Something abut that anaesthetic rush... :inlove:

Qualitative Research Chemical Effects and Experiences
The Wonderful World of Methoxetamine
The 3-Meo-PCP Chapters, Part One

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: Cyclohexylamine]
    #16925782 -

Some people don't understand scientist's obsession with prodding and learning about nature.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: DieCommie]
    #16925803 -

DieCommie said:
Most things humans do are useless and pointless.  Look at how much is spent on sports.  Not playing sports, just watching others play.



Now don't get me wrong pube, I'm not saying this is stupid in any way (even if it actually is). I just can't figure out who and why they pay them to do it. I thought you have to present some convincing arguments to get funding. Such that your research would have some beneficial impact on society. So whats the deal with new elements.

Plus with sports you get to make money from all the mindless zombies who drink their beer and eat their fucking corndogs while watching a bunch of lobotomized monkeys run after a ball.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: Cyclohexylamine]
    #16925809 -

I can enjoy playing a sport, but don't care much to watch. Sometimes some crazy shit does happen though. Once after a batter hit the ball it nailed a bird. What are the odds?

As for new elements, I assume because just like watching sport, sometimes crazy shit can happen. If the right crazy shit happens, it could mean mucho dinero. Also, it is just interesting to learn new things, regardless of how 'pointless' it may be in the grand scheme of things.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: trampis]
    #16925838 -

I wish I had been there to witness it.



--------------------
full blown human

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: mellowparty]
    #16925839 -

mellowparty said:
DieCommie said:
Most things humans do are useless and pointless.  Look at how much is spent on sports.  Not playing sports, just watching others play.



Now don't get me wrong pube, I'm not saying this is stupid in any way (even if it actually is). I just can't figure out who and why they pay them to do it. I thought you have to present some convincing arguments to get funding. Such that your research would have some beneficial impact on society. So whats the deal with new elements.




No.  If you are doing engineering or applied science research then you need to put some proposed 'purpose' for your research in your grant proposal.  If you are doing pure science then your grant proposal is about the strides you hope to make in pure science.  Its already taken for granted that pure science is worth pursuing and no practical application is needed to get grant money.

"Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out, but that is not the reason we are doing it. "

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: mellowparty]
    #16925847 -

Chemists have been working within the same mechanistic framework for nearly 100 years. Let them have their fun.

P.S. I hear there's an island out there...


--------------------
Tickle my bassline.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: DieCommie]
    #16925863 -

I guess that makes sense.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why do people look for new chemical elements? [Re: mellowparty]
    #16925957 -

mellowparty said:
I thought you have to present some convincing arguments to get funding. Such that your research would have some beneficial impact on society. So whats the deal with new elements.



You do, and the rationale is often reiterated in the intro of manuscripts reporting findings.

This is the "spin", and it's vital to survival in academia.  If you can't spin your proposal (even if its a good one), you fail, regardless of how good the idea is.

I could easily imagine proposing that the discovery of new elements provides vital information on how they were formed.  This is applicable to manufacturing newer chemicals, and the more efficient synthesis of existing ones.


--------------------
...the whole experience is (and is as) a profound piece of knowledge.  It is an indellible experience; it is forever known.  I have known myself in a way I doubt I would have ever occurred except as it did.

Smith, P.  Bull. Menninger Clinic (1959) 23:20-27; p. 27.

...most subjects find the experience valuable, some find it frightening, and many say that is it uniquely lovely.

Osmond, H.  Annals, NY Acad Science (1957) 66:418-434; p.436

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Funny: New Chemical Element DiploidM 666 6 06/11/05 11:13 AM
by afoaf
* arguments against abortion? blacksabbathrulz 737 14 10/06/05 05:50 PM
by Captain Loafy McPoopdick
* I convinced her to join me to mushroom land!
( 1 2 3 all )
Fliquid 5,889 50 02/07/06 06:05 AM
by Fliquid
* My Chemical Romance
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
Harbinger 7,457 122 08/26/05 04:03 PM
by marti131
* My Utopian Dream for Better Living Through Chemicals TheFakeSunRa 977 10 04/29/05 11:19 PM
by Dark_Star
* Battle of the elements (super nerdy idea) dr0mni 1,108 14 05/24/05 11:03 AM
by Yarry
* What happens when drugs are legalized? ( DEA arguments) Annom 2,168 4 09/08/04 05:42 PM
by BleaK
* fifth element Mitchnast 1,020 13 01/11/04 09:26 AM
by Clean

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
461 topic views. 6 members, 437 guests and 135 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.024 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 16 queries.