Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Why hasn't the DEA scheduled more RCs?
    #16404845 -

The DEA has been aware of the use of research chemicals for years now. They have have the power to schedule substances, but there is an administrative process. From wikipedia:

"Proceedings to add, delete, or change the schedule of a drug or other substance may be initiated by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), or by petition from any interested party, including the manufacturer of a drug, a medical society or association, a pharmacy association, a public interest group concerned with drug abuse, a state or local government agency, or an individual citizen. When a petition is received by the DEA, the agency begins its own investigation of the drug.

The DEA also may begin an investigation of a drug at any time based upon information received from laboratories, state and local law enforcement and regulatory agencies, or other sources of information.

Once the DEA has collected the necessary data, the Deputy Administrator of DEA,[10] requests from HHS a scientific and medical evaluation and recommendation as to whether the drug or other substance should be controlled or removed from control. This request is sent to the Assistant Secretary of Health of HHS. Then, HHS solicits information from the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and evaluations and recommendations from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and, on occasion, from the scientific and medical community at large. The Assistant Secretary, by authority of the Secretary, compiles the information and transmits back to the DEA a medical and scientific evaluation regarding the drug or other substance, a recommendation as to whether the drug should be controlled, and in what schedule it should be placed.

The medical and scientific evaluations are binding to the DEA with respect to scientific and medical matters. The recommendation on scheduling is binding only to the extent that if HHS recommends that the substance not be controlled, the DEA may not control the substance.

Once the DEA has received the scientific and medical evaluation from HHS, the DEA Administrator will evaluate all available data and make a final decision whether to propose that a drug or other substance be controlled and into which schedule it should be placed.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why hasn't the DEA scheduled more RCs? [Re: Freedom]
    #16415177 -

It's only a matter of time before new drug legislation gets put in place for designer drugs. Something similar to the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004 that placed all anabolic steroids and prohormones as controlled substances.

I remember a few years ago there was just CanadaRC.com and a couple other sites that sold research chemicals but now its all blown up all over the internet, TV, newspapers, etc.

Edited by SheerTerror (06/22/12 04:19 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why hasn't the DEA scheduled more RCs? [Re: SheerTerror]
    #16415450 -

I agree it wouldn't surprise me if 25I gets emergency scheduled this summer, there's been a bunch of nasty incidents and some reported deaths already, and from what I've been reading its about to hit the market big time.


still I wonder what's been holding the DEA back all this time. They don't need to pass a law they just need to go through an administrative process. Is the bureaucratic red tape really that effective in slowing it down?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Why hasn't the DEA scheduled more RCs? [Re: Freedom]
    #16420483 -

Freedom said:
still I wonder what's been holding the DEA back all this time. They don't need to pass a law they just need to go through an administrative process. Is the bureaucratic red tape really that effective in slowing it down?



Typically, its two things: A lack of scientific data and priorities.  Scheduling is an arduous process, it can take up to a year to move it through the multiple agencies involved.


--------------------
...the whole experience is (and is as) a profound piece of knowledge.  It is an indellible experience; it is forever known.  I have known myself in a way I doubt I would have ever occurred except as it did.

Smith, P.  Bull. Menninger Clinic (1959) 23:20-27; p. 27.

...most subjects find the experience valuable, some find it frightening, and many say that is it uniquely lovely.

Osmond, H.  Annals, NY Acad Science (1957) 66:418-434; p.436

Edited by badchad (06/22/12 01:27 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* New Scheduling of AMT and 5-MeO-DIPT gluckspilz 842 4 01/29/03 05:13 PM
by silversoul7
* COP SPEAKS OUT FROM GRAVE AGAINST WAR ON DRUGS
( 1 2 3 4 all )
LSDempire 3,756 66 08/29/05 02:00 AM
by LSDempire
* spore syringe turned over to dea in a legal state by postal worker skullfarmer1979 1,095 7 01/18/05 05:45 PM
by Learyfan
* DEA gets kicked out of Venezuela
( 1 2 all )
LSDempire 1,302 21 08/29/05 07:18 AM
by LSDempire
* DEA Stealing Domain Names JssMthrFcknChrst 909 8 02/27/03 05:07 AM
by sirreal
* DEA kills 14-year old girl pattern 1,565 13 07/15/03 12:03 AM
by pattern
* Ashcroft (Bush Admin) seeks DEA on Medical Marijuana Center Libertarian 448 0 09/04/04 03:45 PM
by Libertarian
* DEA Global Authority
( 1 2 3 4 all )
blink 3,908 74 11/20/03 01:10 PM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
556 topic views. 4 members, 9 guests and 32 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 16 queries.