Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  [ show all ]
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: gzuf] * 1
    #16352739 -

gzuf said:
Enlil said:
Before IP laws, art was a luxury...a rarity...



:lol:

What the fuck? :cookiemonster:




who was the top selling recording artist in 1803?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Great Scott]
    #16352780 -

PeyoteZen said:
The Internet exists. File Sharing exists. Digital information is easily accessible by anyone with a computer.
Good luck, RIAA, your good old days are passed and gone.
Keep paddling upstream with a turd for a paddle if you want to, but the technology has reached a point of no return and sooner or later they will have to adapt to it just like everybody else.
And I'm not even talking right vs. wrong, or stealing vs. not stealing.
I'm just talking about what is.
And what is... is we have technology which enables ripping, streaming, file sharing, etc. and there's really nothing the RIAA can do about it in the long run (big picture).
Yes, targeting random citizens for settlement money is an option, but how exactly does that fix the underlying problem?
It's a never-ending battle that can't be won.
Sooooo I dunno, maybe it's time for them to sit down at the round table and come up with a new business model or product line, one which can actually compete in the market place.



I agree with this.  RIAA needs to keep up with technology and maybe build some sort of gimmick into video and audio files that prevents them from being pirated or shared without authorization.

As for Enlil's argument that the $50,000 fine was not only just, but could've been more, I'm really sorry but I strongly disagree with that.

Your example of Bill Gates being issued a "price tag" to punch you in the nose is a faulty premise for your argument.  If you say the punishments are meant to be deterrents, then $50,000 should be much more than enough to make this woman never pirate anything ever again, assuming she doesn't get massive income.

I know if I got a $20,000 fine for stealing 24 songs, I would never do it again.  If I got a $5,000 fine I would never do it again.  We're not all Bill Gates with plenty of money to blow to download stuff illegally or punch someone in the nose and just pay the fine for it and do it again.


--------------------
Funny Video              Pokemon But With Animals Instead              B

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #16352782 -

Prisoner#1 said:
gzuf said:
Enlil said:
Before IP laws, art was a luxury...a rarity...



:lol:

What the fuck? :cookiemonster:




who was the top selling recording artist in 1803?



Beethoven


--------------------
Funny Video              Pokemon But With Animals Instead              B

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Celestial Traveler]
    #16353314 -

Someone should start a money pool for this lady !

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Celestial Traveler]
    #16353423 -

Celestial Traveler said:
RIAA needs to keep up with technology and maybe build some sort of gimmick into video and audio files that prevents them from being pirated or shared without authorization.



software companies do this frequently and on the day of release it's always
cracked and in usenet the next day, from there it makes it's rounds to other
sources, keep in mind that each time a security feature is added anyone
buying a game is paying for it, the game that cost you $30 last year is $40
in it's new release because of the copy protection

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Celestial Traveler]
    #16353433 -

Celestial Traveler said:
Prisoner#1 said:
gzuf said:
Enlil said:
Before IP laws, art was a luxury...a rarity...



:lol:

What the fuck? :cookiemonster:




who was the top selling recording artist in 1803?



Beethoven




incorrect

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #16353445 -

steal all the music
hey America i am watchin Avengers HD fo free FUCK YO COUCH

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #16353537 -

Prisoner#1 said:
Celestial Traveler said:
RIAA needs to keep up with technology and maybe build some sort of gimmick into video and audio files that prevents them from being pirated or shared without authorization.



software companies do this frequently and on the day of release it's always
cracked and in usenet the next day, from there it makes it's rounds to other
sources, keep in mind that each time a security feature is added anyone
buying a game is paying for it, the game that cost you $30 last year is $40
in it's new release because of the copy protection



True.  That might also be why it usually costs a dollar to download a song.  Maybe if people didn't pirate it so much then it would be cheaper.  But it's all speculation.  Even if people stopped pirating who knows, the market might decide to be a dick and keep the prices the same or barely lower them at all.  And with the amount of music I listen to I would end up spending thousands, if not tens of thousands, of dollars on all my songs.

Don't get me wrong, I don't illegally download but I do listen to a lot of stuff on Youtube that I don't pay for.


--------------------
Funny Video              Pokemon But With Animals Instead              B

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #16353538 -

Prisoner#1 said:
Celestial Traveler said:
who was the top selling recording artist in 1803?



Beethoven




incorrect



Joking :rolleyes:


--------------------
Funny Video              Pokemon But With Animals Instead              B

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Apostle]
    #16353546 -

.

Edited by Johnny Depp (12/19/14 04:39 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Celestial Traveler]
    #16353559 -

Celestial Traveler said:
Prisoner#1 said:
Celestial Traveler said:
who was the top selling recording artist in 1803?



Beethoven




incorrect



Joking :rolleyes:




everyone knows it was Henry Condell

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #16353564 -

:whateverman:


--------------------
Funny Video              Pokemon But With Animals Instead              B

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Johnny Depp]
    #16353581 -

Johnny Depp said:
I live in a country with no copyright laws.



you may want to reconsider that statement, they've been enacting copyright laws since July 26, 2000

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama Administration agrees with RIAA destroying a woman's life [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #16363770 -

Prisoner#1 said:
sonamdrukpa said:
50k, fine.  I don't like it, but fine.  But what's riled me up is the Obama Administration supporting the RIAA's appeal to have the earlier 1.5 million fine re-installed.




I'm certainly no fan of obama or his administration but I'm not seeing how you would expect any POTUS to deny the 'law of the land'. the fines were twice reduces by a judge, she pays $54k, the justice department and Obama himself cannot over turn these decisions

would your opinions be different if the woman was suing the record industry and the jury kept reducing the judgment? wouldnt you support her demand for the millions as opposed to the reductions given by the judge




What the judge did was within the law of the land.  The administration filed a brief in favor of the RIAA's position as part of the appeal process.  They're absolutely within the law to do that too, but the decision to do that is entirely at their discretion and it is blatant string-pulling.  It's POTUS pushing its weight around for the benefit of those who have money to spend on lobbyists or other political connections.

Admittedly, I would not be outraged if the RIAA were sued given that I don't feel the same sort of sympathy for a corporation that I do for a fellow human.  But in this hypothetical situation I would be in favor of reducing an "outrageous" fine (which would have to be in the tens of billions of dollars to be on the same level, given how much this woman probably makes vs. how much the recording industry makes) on the recording industry down to a more reasonable, but still crime-discouraging level (say, a couple hundred million).


I'm late back into the discussion so I think everything I had to say's been said, but I do want to say that these huge fines are probably not very effective at "making an example" out of people.  $1.5 million dollars is simply too huge an amount for the average person to comprehend.  It's the same reason people won't quit smoking to reduce their risk of death by lung cancer but will pull together the willpower to diet 5 pounds off in order to not look fat.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6  [ show all ]

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* I'm busted by the RIAA *HELP* They want $200,000.......
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
gema 6,637 95 09/27/09 02:40 PM
by CMACD
* The RIAA's campaign to spread FACTUALLY INCORRECT propraganda at college campuses (surprised?) kake 546 0 08/31/06 05:22 PM
by kake
* Limewire Sued by RIAA- Might read if you use it
( 1 2 all )
TrippinTeddy 3,085 21 08/06/06 01:22 AM
by TrippinTeddy
* Despite RIAA Loss, File Sharers Face Hefty Fines snoot 558 4 01/19/09 12:54 PM
by upinthetrees
* The RIAA is insane KickleM 1,096 13 04/04/07 06:54 PM
by HighTek
* What.cd and the RIAA!! TrippinTeddy 983 13 11/12/07 02:29 PM
by TrippinTeddy
* RIAA trepanib 788 9 01/17/08 09:14 PM
by yaleforks
* gotta love the RIAA Ramlaen 563 4 02/07/05 08:08 PM
by Learyfan

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
4,828 topic views. 3 members, 446 guests and 167 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.034 seconds spending 0.01 seconds on 17 queries.