Auto-SummaryThe post discusses the definition of religion and agnosticism. The author believes religion includes both beliefs and practices, while agnosticism is a belief in not knowing. They argue that agnosticism is often misunderstood and that people may use it as a short answer when explaining their beliefs. The author also shares their personal experience with religion and how their beliefs evolved after a psychedelic experience, ultimately leading them to a state of non-belief.
DJ_avocado said:
DivineIntensity said: Religion is more of a set of practices rather than just belief... Just because you believe something doesn't make it a religion. And if God came down and set shit straight on earth I think everybody would change how they felt about god
I've always defined religion as a system of beliefs AND practices. Religion is very ritualistic, but at the core is a belief. The agnostic "belief" is "I don't know", so I think of it as a religion similar to atheism.
Honestly man I think I really see where you're coming from, I just think the way we define what beliefs are is different. I don't think the way we define it is even necessarily more right than the others.. but it again proves how delicate communication is when trying to convey such messages.
Because of the way you define religion, you don't see agnostic as as good of a term to describe it as say atheism, because you include ritualism as a part of religion. I guess I kind of view that the same even with religion, but that's why I don't see agnosticism as a religion or anything, just a belief.
Seriously gotta open up the dictionary when you start discussing beliefs haha. Luckily most of the people keeping this going seem to be intelligent individuals capable of that understanding 
DJ_avocado said:
extreme said: I would only even define myself as agnostic to most people because what most people think of when they think of what agnostic means is probably the closest and easiest way to describe my beliefs to another person. But as I mentioned earlier, thoughts/ideas/feelings are infinitely more difficult to communicate to others as compared to instructions and exacts. Science, math, etc are filled with exacts that can't be disputed. For these, communication is a great teacher because it can teach everyone the same way and produce the same successful results. Very reliable. But I could write a thousand page book and not describe the way my beliefs work in full to anyone. While reading, the reader would likely implicate their own beliefs, ideas, etc and get a twisted vision. Or they might get it damn near right, but not perfect, because nobody can live inside my brain. Shit even I don't really know what my beliefs are exactly. Oh wait that's why if I had to describe it all in one word that's why I choose agnostic 
In a few short sentences, it would be more like "I don't claim to know. Was raised Christian. Taken some ideals of Jesus as my own morals. Added to them certain Buddhist principles. I still don't know for sure though which is 100% right."
It can be impossible to relate your beliefs to another person, why bother? Usually if a stranger asks me religious questions, I'll just say, "I don't know". I don't tell them I'm buddhist and try to back myself up somehow, "I don't know" makes sense to me. People get fucking confused if you simply say "I don't know".
My BEEEF with being "Agnostic" is that why can't you just say, "I don't know" or "I don't believe". In actuality, we DON'T know, and agnosticism just recognizes that. The fact that we "don't know" is a fact as of now, there's nothing more to add to it.
haha can't keep up 
but that's a good point.. here's my answer. why do i try to relate my beliefs if they are impossible to explain? why bother? well i would use the term agnostic with someone if they asked for my beliefs, because as a short answer, it would be much easier to just tell someone that than what I ACTUALLY believe haha. we're seeing that now matter of fact! 
I also agree that for the most part, agnosticism should be common sense. just remember there are many people that's minds haven't been stretched even a fraction as far as some of the lengths we've taken our consciuosness. taking apart your ego and the like are things that most humans will never even come close to experiencing. i'm willing to bet a good number of people around here though could tell you a little something about that though.
i mean until my first acid trip i was somewhat a fence sitter in the same right, but a tad more Christian then than I am now. but that first trip, where in the end as the colors were fading and it was time for sleep and i was left with only my thoughts and i started thinking of fun things to contemplate while under this particular influence, i chose to think about religion.
oh boy this was kind of a big event in my life *catches breath*
as i lay there i finally focused into these real realities. i didn't think for the benefit of myself, i thought completely objectively. it was the first time i noticed the deconditioning. the first time i was really able to let go of a certain God in particular over another. and it was kind of easy. i wasn't reforming ANOTHER belief on top of my preexisting one.. i was just terminating the one that I had been given at a very young age. i simply went back to nothing again. maybe you could almost call me atheist, but i wouldn't define myself with that, because i don't believe it's possible to say 100% that a higher power does NOT exist
Hope you know DJ I have no beef with you here or anything just trying to clear up this confusing mess hehe. it's been fun discussing this all day/night
|