sof4r0ckeRs1984 said:

---

LittleDipster said:

its already exploding in my parts. people that don't even do drugs are starting to talk about 25i... feels banned man

---

Nature Boy said:

shroomie_glen said:

I take solace in the fact that if I am about to dose some "Lucy" and I swallow it instantly, and nothing happens...

AT least I wouldnt have to  endure the unwanted/unexpected trip of a phenethylamine when I was wanting Lucy....

---

I'm hoping for two, very particular things:  that the folks who chose to lay the 25i-NBOMe do not misrepresent it, and that they competently and conservatively lay it at ~500 mcg per hit.

I've tried it and written about it, AND I'm looking forward to trying it again!  See: http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/15796272/page/1 ; That says something since I have a decent stock of microstars in my possession.  25i a pretty decent experience at reasonable doses.  Not something one would have to "endure" if one already fancied the LSD experience.  Quite the opposite, in fact.  They're just not THAT different, and IMHO a seasoned user of LSD will rather enjoy a  night dancing with 25-i-NBOMe in the 500 mcg range.

My suggestion:  Don't be so dogmatic and closed-minded.  And don't knock it if you haven't tried it.  Remember too, an early, key component to the psychedelic "revolution" started with Aldous Huxley...and his most glowing writings were recounts of his experience with Mescaline - a phenethylamine.



N.B.

---

Quote:

shroomie_glen said, in part:
I am not closed minded, I just don't like being "DUPED".  When I want to dance with Lucy, don't give me her semi good looking cousin that sucks a good dick.

---

mellowparty said:

y u no stop about talking tryptamine and phenetylamine experience. Instead talk in terms of receptor affinities because in the end its the receptor that dictates your experience and the phen/trypt-receptor relationship is a thin line that most of you don't seem to appreciate.

---

legit27 said:

i'd probably buy lots or RC's if dealers would tell me what they were, but most of the time, not even the dealers know around here. It's just acid. Acid could be anything that makes you trip, just like no one really knows what's in the ex that goes around here. Sadly acid has taken the same turn as ex did.
What are the chances of coming across RC's that are in viles? or are viles usually LSD?

---

legit27 said:

So blotters safest way to go for acid? i dont think i ever come across them. Only vials of cid around here. A friend of mine doses this shit that makes is bitter and burns his tongue a bit last a long time too. So i figured it was DOx and never tried it.
The two times i did acid were dropped onto altoids so i really couldn't tell, but fuck i tripped hard. Dont think it was an RC.
the 2c's are pretty readily available though, and never get passed as LSD.

---

floatingwater said:

sof4r0ckeRs1984 said:

---

I'll tell you what man, despite the cheesey emoticon thing you posted, I will admit that I was a little overbearing in my attempts to convey my disappointment in the potential mixing of two drugs on identical medium in the street culture.

What it boils down to is that I have a point but its validity is strongest when considering drug culture of the past, when LSD and only LSD was the king of the blotter and liquid scene. Yes, there have been several other research chemicals available on blotter over the past 50 years or so, but none of them have had the ease of distribution and spread of discussion like these new research chemicals (namely the nBOMe series) have achieved in this day and age. In the past, from what i've read from people who've been around long enough to talk of the past, it seems as though, on average, there was very little instances of deception when buying LSD, and if you ran into something other than LSD it was not by chance but by purpose. It is clear from reading the threads i've read over the past couple years of being a member in this community that this has changed and is continually changing for better or worse.

You, as well, have a point that is gaining validity every day with the increasing popularity of these types of new research chemicals, and the unfortunately expected less than perfect separation of the two very interesting psychedelic chemicals.

I stand by my original assertion that a spread of knowledge is much needed to prevent a wave of confusion that could potentially be the norm in years to come. Unfortunately, you just presented me with a perceived opportunity to squeeze some of my thoughts on the topic at hand in to a tangled and contrived response.

Tread safely RC heads, respect the past and present drug culture, do your best to know a bit about your sources at all possible chances, and you'll be fine by me. There is much you can teach curious minds if done with proper intentions.

---

mellowparty said:

y u no stop about talking tryptamine and phenetylamine experience. Instead talk in terms of receptor affinities because in the end its the receptor that dictates your experience and the phen/trypt-receptor relationship is a thin line that most of you don't seem to appreciate.

---