Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
The Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon
    #15860364 -

The Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon

http://www.damninteresting.com/the-baader-meinhof-phenomenon/

You may have heard about Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon before. In fact, you probably learned about it for the first time very recently. If not, then you just might hear about it again very soon. Baader-Meinhof is the phenomenon where one happens upon some obscure piece of information– often an unfamiliar word or name– and soon afterwards encounters the same subject again, often repeatedly. Anytime the phrase “That’s so weird, I just heard about that the other day” would be appropriate, the utterer is hip-deep in Baader-Meinhof.

Most people seem to have experienced the phenomenon at least a few times in their lives, and many people encounter it with such regularity that they anticipate it upon the introduction of new information. But what is the underlying cause? Is there some hidden meaning behind Baader-Meinhof events?

The phenomenon bears some similarity to synchronicity, which is the experience of having a highly meaningful coincidence… such as having someone telephone you while you are thinking about them. Both phenomena invoke a feeling of mild surprise, and cause one to ponder the odds of such an intersection. Both smack of destiny, as though the events were supposed to occur in just that arrangement… as though we’re witnessing yet another domino tip over in a chain of dominoes beyond our reckoning.

Despite science’s cries that a world as complex as ours invites frequent coincidences, observation tells us that such an explanation is inadequate. Observation shows us that Baader-Meinhof strikes with blurring accuracy, and too frequently to be explained away so easily. But over the centuries, observation has also shown us that observation itself is highly flawed, and not to be trusted.

The reason for this is our brains’ prejudice towards patterns. Our brains are fantastic pattern recognition engines, a characteristic which is highly useful for learning, but it does cause the brain to lend excessive importance to unremarkable events. Considering how many words, names, and ideas a person is exposed to in any given day, it is unsurprising that we sometimes encounter the same information again within a short time. When that occasional intersection occurs, the brain promotes the information because the two instances make up the beginnings of a sequence. What we fail to notice is the hundreds or thousands of pieces of information which aren’t repeated, because they do not conform to an interesting pattern. This tendency to ignore the “uninteresting” data is an example of selective attention.

In point of fact, coincidences themselves are usually just an artifact of perception. We humans tend to underestimate the probability of coinciding events, so our expectations are at odds with reality. And non-coincidental events do not grab our attention with anywhere near the same intensity, because coincidences are patterns, and the brain actually stimulates us for successfully detecting patterns… hence their inflated value. In short, patterns are habit-forming.

But when we hear a word or name which we just learned the previous day, it often feels like more than a mere coincidence. This is because Baader-Meinhof is amplified by the recency effect, a cognitive bias that inflates the importance of recent stimuli or observations. This increases the chances of being more aware of the subject when we encounter it again in the near future.

How the phenomenon came to be known as “Baader-Meinhof” is uncertain. It seems likely that some individual learned of the existence of the historic German urban guerrilla group which went by that name, and then heard the name again soon afterwards. This plucky wordsmith may then have named the phenomenon after the very subject which triggered it. But it is certainly a mouthful; a shorter name might have more hope of penetrating the lexicon.

However it came to be known by such a name, it is clear that Baader-Meinhof is yet another charming fantasy whose magic is diluted by stick-in-the-mud science and its sinister cohort: facts. But if you’ve never heard of the phenomenon before, be sure to watch for it in the next few days… brain stimulation is nice.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon [Re: Jessica Swift]
    #15860498 -

Chances are you had heard the words, phrases or concepts before, but they had no meaning to you so it went, 'in one ear and out the other' therefore didn't enter into your long term memory.
Whereas if you have just read an article, or some such, that gives you an understanding behind said words, phrases or concepts, when you hear them again the connections between the synapses, created as you learned about them, are stimulated preventing the words, phrases or concepts "going out the other ear"

Glad you cleared up the Baader-Meinhof reference i was a little :confused:


--------------------
whether low pressure sucks or high pressure blows...
it's a bugger to cycle in.

even though I'm feeling good
Something tells me I'd better activate my prayer capsule

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon [Re: deucedbi9]
    #15860572 -

uhm, brains generally work to find patterns that are actually there, not just patterns for the sake of finding patterns.

it wouldn't be very biologically useful to see hordes of jaguars every time we looked at the abstract texture of trees. 

Anyhow, cool story bro.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon [Re: teamkiller]
    #15860655 -

teamkiller said:
uhm, brains generally work to find patterns that are actually there, not just patterns for the sake of finding patterns.




And yet, there is ample evidence in the form of little mind tricks that demonstrate that the brain actually does try to find a pattern even if there is none. Ever heard of the Rorschach test, for example?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon [Re: koraks]
    #15860682 -

With the rorschach test people are given specific instructions to free associate. 

People seeing a wolf in the rorschach don't scream and try and run away.  People that think they're experiencing co-incidence, really behave as though the co-incidence is real.

The mind definitely has its little idiosyncrasies, but i would say except in the cases of the seriously delusional, i don't see why people would see co-incidences if their brain is taking in evidence that something isn't a co-incidence.



I'm not saying i believe in synchronicity at all, or that people don't have biases in the patterns they notice, i just disagree with the way this argument against it is presented.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon [Re: Jessica Swift]
    #15860686 -

I am familiar with the theory and I do find it bizarre when it occurs.

Which theory came first, the one discussed or Jung's idea of synchronicity?

This seems like an extension of Jung's to me.


--------------------

"Atrophic interludes weave through my life far too often, for me to fight the biggest enemies"




"Standing on the corner of 5th and Vermouth"


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Shroom Phenomenon shannxn 219 5 05/15/16 07:04 PM
by Fools Crow
* Rorschach Konnrade 620 7 05/05/06 07:28 PM
by relativexistance
* the Streetlight Phenomenon
( 1 2 all )
organdonor 2,289 33 01/31/06 02:38 PM
by LuciferSam
* Synchronicity and you
( 1 2 all )
DeadHearts 2,685 25 01/31/11 12:44 AM
by DeadHearts
* The only time I ever saw a UFO (The Hessdalen Phenomenon) ivi 2,476 9 09/15/04 01:12 PM
by Phishgrrl
* Synchronicity Derived From Eternal Mathematics Unparalized 675 3 10/10/09 02:20 PM
by I AM SWIM
* paranoid of people from synchronicities?
( 1 2 3 all )
TheCreampie 3,895 55 12/10/11 01:47 PM
by teamkiller
* Synchronicity s240779 286 2 01/09/12 10:59 AM
by thirtygoats

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
1,090 topic views. 5 members, 90 guests and 95 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 16 queries.