Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Science and Technology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
how much has changed since the intel pentium 4 processor was designed for the 448 socket
    #15652169 -

take a look:

http://www.astahost.com/info/ticml-intel-pentium-socket-478-775.html

YES YES YES...
The LGA 775 Socket was concibed for trespassing the 3.5 Ghz fronteer wich is imposible to pass using only 478 contacts between mother and CPU.
The LGA 775 also eliminates the electrmagnteic noises produced by the pin array by removing the pines, and has better surface of contact by using gold contacts surfaces, the surface of contact is no more a single point, it's now a a surface.
The only bad news on LGA 775 it's that the gold is very maleable and it's very sensible to contaminations and scratchs, and the socket on motherboard is also very "weak".
The "little wafer" (core) need to be "feeded" with data to process, and needs to delivery that processed data the fastest way possible, so the pins where the bottleneck for todays CPU, as AMD increases the number of pins for more than 900 intel opted to use 775 contacts with electromgnetic noise near to zero, and with more surface of contact they can carry more electrcity wich means more wats and more MHZ.
Intel announces the 1066 MHZ front side bus on Q1 - 05 using this socket. There is no way to reach that FSB using FPGA 478


--------------------
:kingcrankey: I did not say to edit my signature soulidarity! Now forever I will never remember what I said about understanding the secrets of the universe by paying attention to subtleties!

:facepalm: I'm never giving you the password again. Jerk

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: how much has changed since the intel pentium 4 processor was designed for the 448 socket [Re: imachavel]
    #15652228 -

Hope it works better than you type. :shrug:


--------------------
You make it all possible. Doesn't it feel good?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: how much has changed since the intel pentium 4 processor was designed for the 448 socket [Re: imachavel] * 1
    #15652809 -

Thanks Imachavel for informing us of this late breaking news! I can't wait to buy me a 775 socket CPU with 1066MHZ front side bus!! HOOO DOGY!!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: how much has changed since the intel pentium 4 processor was designed for the 448 socket [Re: magicbastard]
    #15657317 -

hoo doggy. If I had to wake up one day, and not know that a 775 socket was from 7 years ago, I would feel so dumb! I mean it's like twice as many pins now! How can people not be obsessed with pc's and not know everything to know about them!! HOW!! :facepalm:


--------------------
:kingcrankey: I did not say to edit my signature soulidarity! Now forever I will never remember what I said about understanding the secrets of the universe by paying attention to subtleties!

:facepalm: I'm never giving you the password again. Jerk

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: how much has changed since the intel pentium 4 processor was designed for the 448 socket [Re: imachavel] * 1
    #15659342 -

If you really want to wow us with 7 year old technology, use something more reputable, like Wikipedia or perhaps an actual tech news article, something that has some depth to it. Not a free hosting website that some fucktard is comparing two different sockets asking which one is better, when fucktard should be comparing what goes inside the sockets. 

Then you quoted (without any form of quotation so I thought you were actually saying that stupid shit) with the second biggest retard's quote from that website to entice us to read what the fuck you're trying to say in this post. (The first biggest retard was asking if he could swap out the cpu from his desktop with the one from his laptop)

How about you start something more current and perhaps a little more interesting, like the tablets and ultra books from CES. Then compare it to something like the Osborne 1, the first mobile computer. Even then, is it worth making a post about it?

With the weird and random shit that you come up with, I believe you are somehow related to cleverbot.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: how much has changed since the intel pentium 4 processor was designed for the 448 socket [Re: magicbastard]
    #15662451 -

magicbastard said:
If you really want to wow us with 7 year old technology, use something more reputable, like Wikipedia or perhaps an actual tech news article, something that has some depth to it....

Then you quoted (without any form of quotation...


Yeah, if your going to make a new thread, it would be helpful to make it clear what the topic for discussion is.  This isn't a hard and fast rule in this forum, but unless the content is pretty on-topic and provocative on its own, its helpful to start the discussion.  I'm not really sure what the point of this thread is.  In general, this forum is for discussion, not dumping content you've found elsewhere.

Another good point mentioned is that you should make it clear, when posting someone else's work under your name, that you are not the author.  A simple link or citation is fine.  Otherwise, its confusing and difficult to judge the quality of the source or representativeness of the excerpt posted.

imachavel: what is the purpose of this thread?  What do you wish to discuss, specifically?  Could you please start the discussion?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

General Interest > Science and Technology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* how hot can processors run? solidshroom 1,334 14 03/24/05 04:05 PM
by newuser1492
* Determining Processor Speed
( 1 2 all )		 Joshua 3,223 20 04/29/04 08:14 PM
by TinMan
* OSx86 Vvellum 1,014 17 08/29/05 07:16 AM
by Irradiated_Feces
* Intel's new route: Gigahertz war finally coming to an end daba 1,210 13 05/15/04 09:24 PM
by daba
* AMD or INTEL...help
( 1 2 all )		 Cubieman420 2,526 27 02/06/04 12:03 AM
by Le_Canard
* Intel 64 bit chip KrazieH8er 614 1 05/14/04 02:25 AM
by daba
* AMD vs Intel Lana 1,636 11 12/04/02 12:03 AM
by IDontGrow
* Intel discontinues Northwood (Socket 478 Processor) daba 467 0 07/23/04 11:41 PM
by daba

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: trendal, automan, Northerner
652 topic views. 0 members, 1 guests and 5 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.028 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 16 queries.