Home | Community | Message Board


Kraken Kratom
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflineTheCaptain
addict

Registered: 09/04/01
Posts: 426
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 11 years, 3 months
You are being misled...
    #1301544 - 02/12/03 05:46 AM (13 years, 9 months ago)

MI6 and CIA: the new enemy within
By Paul Lashmar and Raymond Whitaker
09 February 2003


Tony Blair and George Bush are encountering an unexpected obstacle in their campaign for war against Iraq – their own intelligence agencies.

Britain and America's spies believe that they are being politicised: that the intelligence they provide is being selectively applied to lead to the opposite conclusion from the one they have drawn, which is that Iraq is much less of a threat than their political masters claim. Worse, when the intelligence agencies fail to do the job, the politicians will not stop at plagiarism to make their case, even "tweaking" the plagiarised material to ensure a better fit.

"You cannot just cherry-pick evidence that suits your case and ignore the rest. It is a cardinal rule of intelligence," said one aggrieved officer. "Yet that is what the PM is doing." Not since Harold Wilson has a Prime Minister been so unpopular with his top spies.

The mounting tension is mirrored in Washington. "We've gone from a zero position, where presidents refused to cite detailed intel as a source, to the point now where partisan material is being officially attributed to these agencies," said one US intelligence source.

Mr Blair is facing an unprecedented, if covert, rebellion by his top spies, who last week used the politicians' own weapon – the strategic leak – against him. The BBC received a Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS) document which showed that British intelligence believes there are no current links between the Iraqi regime and the al-Qa'ida network. The classified document, written last month, said there had been contact between the two in the past, but it assessed that any fledgling relationship foundered due to mistrust and incompatible ideologies.

That conclusion contradicted one of the main charges laid against Saddam Hussein by the United States and Britain, most notably in Wednesday's speech by the Secretary of State, Colin Powell, to the UN Security Council – that he has cultivated contacts with the group blamed for the 11 September attacks.

Such a leak of up-to-date and sensitive material reveals the depth of anger within Britain's spy community over the misuse of intelligence by Downing Street. "A DIS document like this is highly secret. Whoever leaked it must have been quite senior and had unofficial approval from within the highest levels of British intelligence," said one insider. In response the Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, tried to play down the importance of the DIS, which he repeatedly called the Defence Intelligence Services.

No sooner had that embarrassment passed, however, than it emerged that large chunks of the Government's latest dossier on Iraq, which claimed to draw on "intelligence material", were taken from published academic articles, some of them several years old. It was this recycled material that Mr Powell held up in front of a worldwide television audience, saying: "I would call my colleagues' attention to the fine paper that the United Kingdom distributed ... which describes in exquisite detail Iraqi deception activities."

Now Glen Rangwala, the Cambridge University analyst who blew the whistle on the original plagiarism, has pointed out the deception did not end there. He showed that the young Downing Street team, led by Alison Blackshaw, Alastair Campbell's personal assistant, which put the document together had "hardened" the language in several places (see box).

How selectively the work of the intelligence agencies is being used on both sides of the Atlantic is shown by a revealing clash between Senator Bob Graham and the Bush administration's top intelligence advisers. Mr Graham, a Democrat, is chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Last July, baffled by the apparently contradictory assessments on Iraq by America's 13 different intelligence agencies, he asked for a report to be drawn up by the CIA that estimated the likelihood of Saddam Hussein using weapons of mass destruction.

The CIA procrastinated, but finally produced a report after Senator Graham threatened to accuse them of obstruction. The conclusions were so significant that he immediately asked for it to be declassified. The CIA concluded that the likelihood of Saddam Hussein using such weapons was "very low" for the "foreseeable future". The only circumstances in which Iraq would be more likely to use chemical weapons or encourage terrorist attacks would be if it was attacked.

After more arguments the CIA partly declassified the report. Senator Graham noted that the parts released were those that made the case for war with Iraq. Those that did not were withheld. He appealed, and the extra material was eventually released. Yet the report has largely been ignored by the US media.

Last week Colin Powell made much of the presence in Iraq of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the man he identified as running an al-Qa'ida network from Baghdad. He drew on information from al-Zarqawi's captured deputy, but made no mention of another explosive allegation from the same detainee: that Osama bin Laden's organisation received passports and $1m (?600,000) in cash from a member of the royal family in Qatar. It is well known in US intelligence circles that the CIA director, George Tenet, is angry with the Qatari government's failure to take action. But the Gulf state would be the main US air operations base in any war on Iraq, and Washington does not want to air the inconvenient facts in public.

The doctored dossier

A British government dossier, "Iraq – its infrastructure of concealment, deception and intimidation", was largely copied – complete with poor punctuation and grammar – from an article in last September's Middle East Review of International Affairs and two articles in Jane's Intelligence Review.

But the Downing Street compilers also rounded up the numbers and inserted stronger language than in the original. In a section on a movement called Fedayeen Saddam, members are, according to the original, "recruited from regions loyal to Saddam". The Government dossier says they are "press-ganged from regions known to be loyal to Saddam".

On Fedayeen Saddam's total membership, the original says 18,000 to 40,000. The dossier says 30,000 to 40,000.

A similar bumping-up of figures occurs with the description of the Directorate of Military Intelligence.

Included among the duties of the secret police, the Mukhabarat, says the original, are "monitoring foreign embassies in Iraq" and "aiding opposition groups in hostile regimes". The dossier says the duties include "spying on foreign embassies in Iraq" and "supporting terrorist organisations in hostile regimes".

The plagiarists cannot even copy correctly, confusing two organisations called General Security and Military Security. This means that the dossier says Military Security was created in 1992, then refers to it moving to new headquarters in 1990. The head of Military Security in 1997 is named as Taha al-Ahbabi, when he was actually in charge of General Security.


--------------------
"I mean, it's real hard to be free when you are bought and sold in the marketplace. 'Course, don't ever tell anybody that they're not free 'cause then they're gonna get real busy killin' and maimin' to prove to you that they are."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBowlKiller
----
Registered: 09/22/02
Posts: 757
Last seen: 12 years, 18 days
Re: You are being misled... [Re: TheCaptain]
    #1301970 - 02/12/03 09:35 AM (13 years, 9 months ago)

Yes people are being misled badly.

I am not sure what can be done.


--------------------
----


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinepattern
multiplayer

Registered: 07/19/02
Posts: 2,183
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 1 year, 8 months
Re: You are being misled... [Re: TheCaptain]
    #1302011 - 02/12/03 09:50 AM (13 years, 9 months ago)

Bush and Blair are probably being spoon-fed these same lies, and making decisions from them.


--------------------
man = monkey + mushroom


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineGazzBut
Refraction

Registered: 10/15/02
Posts: 4,733
Loc: London UK
Last seen: 4 months, 7 hours
Re: You are being misled... [Re: pattern]
    #1302141 - 02/12/03 10:51 AM (13 years, 9 months ago)

So who do you think is spoon feeding them and why?


--------------------
Always Smi2le


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinepattern
multiplayer

Registered: 07/19/02
Posts: 2,183
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 1 year, 8 months
Re: You are being misled... [Re: GazzBut]
    #1302232 - 02/12/03 11:23 AM (13 years, 9 months ago)

> So who do you think is spoon feeding them and why?

I'm betting that all information going to Bush gets filtered by his cabinet of hawks, who skew everything to fit their ideology.  Slim chance that Bush browses the internet or reads any variety of newspapers.  He probably watches CNN and if he's feeling daring, flips to the BBC.  And what better way to get in touch with the world, than by hanging out with Ashcroft, Cheney, and Walters?

Rumsfeld is my top pick: an old man who carries a long list of grudges against the world. 

Course it's all just conjecture. :wink: 


--------------------
man = monkey + mushroom


Edited by pattern (02/12/03 11:53 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineMushyMay
Brian Eno is mypersonal God FNORD

Registered: 02/19/02
Posts: 423
Loc: ACT, Australia
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: You are being misled... [Re: GazzBut]
    #1302239 - 02/12/03 11:25 AM (13 years, 9 months ago)

It's the Illuminati...

...they've replace the world leaders with mindless zombie alien clones and are preparing us for an invasion.

[insert manic scream here]


--------------------
MushyMay is a fictional character, as a result any information provided by MushyMay is also fictitious.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineTheCaptain
addict

Registered: 09/04/01
Posts: 426
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 11 years, 3 months
Re: You are being misled... [Re: pattern]
    #1302281 - 02/12/03 11:39 AM (13 years, 9 months ago)

Hmm, i unno...

I mean the way I see it, youve gotta have some sort of idea whats going on in the world to get that high up. Dont forget they are privy to all the things we dont hear as far as diplomatic relations go, and its fair to say that leaders and politicians know more about the inside scoop than the public. Furthermore, I would think that a politicians persoanl aims (re-election, popularity, $) have quite an effect on what we the public hear.


--------------------
"I mean, it's real hard to be free when you are bought and sold in the marketplace. 'Course, don't ever tell anybody that they're not free 'cause then they're gonna get real busy killin' and maimin' to prove to you that they are."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineTheCaptain
addict

Registered: 09/04/01
Posts: 426
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 11 years, 3 months
Re: You are being misled... [Re: BowlKiller]
    #1302294 - 02/12/03 11:43 AM (13 years, 9 months ago)

"Yes people are being misled badly.

I am not sure what can be done. "

Well, for starters I think everyone has to start with a good grasp of history... unbiased history that is. And reading a vairety of sources (not the newspaper) helps too...

But- people are too lazy to do that. And, as a result become sheep.


--------------------
"I mean, it's real hard to be free when you are bought and sold in the marketplace. 'Course, don't ever tell anybody that they're not free 'cause then they're gonna get real busy killin' and maimin' to prove to you that they are."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Clinton aide accuses Obama of plagiarism
( 1 2 all )
lonestar2004 1,784 28 02/19/08 05:59 PM
by johnm214
* More Evidence Bush Misled Nation somebodyelse 548 6 07/08/03 01:49 PM
by luvdemshrooms
* Kerry: Bush misled Americans on war Learyfan 453 4 06/19/03 09:41 PM
by luvdemshrooms
* "Declassified" document.
cb9fl
430 3 05/01/05 03:54 PM
by Psychoactive1984
* Mccain says Phil Graham doesn't speak for him Coaster 1,237 18 07/21/08 12:22 AM
by dill705
* Harper denies latest allegations of speech plagiarism fantastical 321 2 10/06/08 05:37 PM
by fantastical
* Ex-Aide: Powell Misled Americans Edame 481 5 10/15/03 10:39 PM
by PsiloKitten
* BEYOND BUSH - Part I RonoS 832 12 07/02/03 05:07 PM
by Rono

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
376 topic views. 1 members, 0 guests and 9 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.052 seconds spending 0.001 seconds on 14 queries.