Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Sports Forum
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: Granderson to the Yanks? [Re: robbyberto]
    #11632328 -

Do you mean both of those years?  When he was a baby?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Granderson to the Yanks? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #11632374 -

4.88 FIP in 08
4.28 FIP in 09
He's just an average pitcher. Scherzer screams upside, Jackson screams regression.


--------------------
R.I.P Rod Beck

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Granderson to the Yanks? [Re: robbyberto]
    #11635149 -

What's FIP?  How about a link to the stats you used instead of a screenshot?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Granderson to the Yanks? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #11635688 -

FIP :

Tom Tango's Fielding Independent Pitching. Fielding Independent Pitching, a measure of all those things for which a pitcher is specifically responsible. The formula is (HR*13+(BB+HBP-IBB)*3-K*2)/IP, plus a league-specific factor (usually around 3.2) to round out the number to an equivalent ERA number. FIP helps you understand how well a pitcher pitched, regardless of how well his fielders fielded.

I feel that FIP is a much better indicator of future performance than ERA.


--------------------
R.I.P Rod Beck

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Granderson to the Yanks? [Re: robbyberto]
    #11636759 -

Would that not penalize sinker ball pitchers and overvalue strikeout artists?  For instance a pitcher who pitches to contact with fewer pitches per inning and a lot of DP grounders will not show so well while being generally more effective.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Granderson to the Yanks? [Re: zappaisgod]
    #11636857 -

To an extent, yes it does. IMO, it's still better than ERA. Bad pitchers don't have a good FIP for very long, but they can have a lucky ERA all season long. There are other, more advanced metrics, but FIP is pretty easy to understand. tRA would be better takes into account the types of batted balls like you pointed out FIP does not.

Edited by robbyberto (12/12/09 02:10 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]

General Interest > Sports Forum
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Jacoby Elsbury signs with the Yanks: 7 years 153million
( 1 2 all )		 LittleBill 2,401 35 12/11/13 10:29 AM
by robbyberto
* Fucking Granderson. OneMoreRobot3021 787 11 04/04/07 03:14 PM
by Deadmaker
* Granderson and Hanley Ramírez,D.Cabrera up for trade kilroy69 698 4 05/14/06 06:00 PM
by kilroy69
* Yanks vs. White Sox Deadmaker 1,248 13 05/17/07 04:14 PM
by THE KRAT BARON
* Burnett to Yanks
( 1 2 3 all )		 whattheheck 3,574 42 12/15/08 06:20 PM
by zappaisgod
* Hey OMR, how bout them yanks? Madtowntripper 1,254 15 04/10/06 09:56 AM
by Banez
* Yanks! THE KRAT BARON 2,187 15 08/22/06 04:39 PM
by Deadmaker
* Yanks go all in on CC before the flop zappaisgod 1,154 15 11/22/08 11:26 AM
by robbyberto

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: psilocybinjunkie, 13shrooms
2,751 topic views. 0 members, 9 guests and 0 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.027 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 17 queries.