Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: ThirdEyeOpening]
    #11211522 -

ThirdEyeOpening said:
Zerolive said:
i did my research, i still think its a bad idea. again the whole really wtf for lets cure cancer FINALLY and HUGE DEFICIT comes to mind but i guess your one track mind cant keep up




NASA didnt make the deficit..


And i bet you cant name what NASA has done for your life with out googling it...



Never said it did, the presence of the deficit is the fucking point why we shouldn't spend billions on bullshit like this. a smart investment is to go GREEN. set up the solar panels, natural gas lines, fuck off of oil. feed the hungry, ...ect

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: Zerolive]
    #11211534 -

Go green?

Nuclear!


--------------------
Admins can't read graphs.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: ThirdEyeOpening]
    #11211540 -

Quote:
And i bet you cant name what NASA has done for your life with out googling it...



nasty dehydrated ice cream?

and yeah didn't the indians already discover water on the moon?

and yeah aren't we talking about huge deficits in our budget and needing to cut medicare, etc.?


--------------------
Everybody's a ninja...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: Zerolive]
    #11211585 -

Thats up to the politicions/lobbyists.

Nasa is on a pretty well fixed budget, thats is actually not that big.

http://www.thespacereview.com/article/898/1

Quote:
According to budget documents obtained from the Government Printing Office, the national budget for 2007 totals about $2.784 trillion. At $16.143 billion, spending on NASA accounts for 0.58% of this.




--------------------

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. Im not too sure about the former.      -Einstein

Of course the rules need to be enforced, but the goal of law and order should be to create a just society, not to enforce laws. -Unknown

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”  -Stephen Roberts

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: ThirdEyeOpening]
    #11211601 -

for 2010 Nasa's budget is 18.7 billion

Yes is a lot, but its a drop in the bucket for most ALL plans that are up for debate atm.


Quote:
Provides $18.7 billion for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.




http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy10/browse.html


--------------------

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. Im not too sure about the former.      -Einstein

Of course the rules need to be enforced, but the goal of law and order should be to create a just society, not to enforce laws. -Unknown

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”  -Stephen Roberts

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: SleepyF0x]
    #11211632 -

A great deal of new innovations useful here on earth have resulted from space travel. Taking the attitude of "ignore space and fix our problems here"  seems to be the basic argument for people against this project, but that wasn't how the thread started out at all; it was sensationalist, comparing it to things like Ebola and AIDS.

We're going to have to explore more of space sooner or later in order to survive as a species and plans to build a lunar base and fueling station is a proactive first step. NASA is not the one being short sighted here; if anything, amongst all our government committees and organizations we have running things for us they may be one of the only ones actually doing their jobs.

And, just because the Indians 'discovered water' themselves isn't really an argument for anything. There's probably loads of additional data that India didn't collect, and loads more that will still need to be collected after this mission in order to plan building a base there.


--------------------
Life is a tale, told by an idiot, full of sound and fury and signifying nothing

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: SleepyF0x]
    #11211644 -

KrishnaDreamer said:
Quote:
And i bet you cant name what NASA has done for your life with out googling it...



nasty dehydrated ice cream?

and yeah didn't the indians already discover water on the moon?

and yeah aren't we talking about huge deficits in our budget and needing to cut medicare, etc.?





Here's a few off the top of my head


scratch resistant lenses
memory foam
Aero gel
long distance telecommunications
gel shoe insoles
cutting groves in concrete, for water to flow away
cordless tools/high powered batteries
water filters


hell even disposable dipers


--------------------

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. Im not too sure about the former.      -Einstein

Of course the rules need to be enforced, but the goal of law and order should be to create a just society, not to enforce laws. -Unknown

“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”  -Stephen Roberts

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: Morgenstern]
    #11211704 -

Mataspore said:
Go green?

Nuclear!



Seriously we are retarded for not using more nuke plants.
They are massively powerful AND they have no atmospheric emissions.
I'm not saying nuclear waste is a good thing but it is NOT an unsolvable problem and right now nuclear power is the perfect band-aid for our greenhouse emissions problem.


BTW, to whoever was bitching about NASA -- NASA, who's entire budget for all of their programs, is under $20 billion a year -- being not worth its funding in this dumbfuck economic fluctuation: are you even aware of our military budget?
For that matter, have you just looked at the way the USA behaves?
NASA is one of the only things the United States does that's still worth being proud of, and you think its worth less annually than what we spent every 2 months in Iraq?

America needs to smarten the fuck up, and that is NOT going to happen by funding NASA less.


--------------------
Weedmaster P knows the truth.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: ThirdEyeOpening]
    #11211969 -

lmao i was being facetious...

Quote:
We're going to have to explore more of space sooner or later in order to survive as a species and plans to build a lunar base and fueling station is a proactive first step.



yeah... but that's like future sci-fi shit. don't you think we should advance a little more in the technology and science field first?

i mean shit, you know how much fucking fuel those things burn?

Quote:
Seriously we are retarded for not using more nuke plants.
They are massively powerful AND they have no atmospheric emissions.
I'm not saying nuclear waste is a good thing but it is NOT an unsolvable problem and right now nuclear power is the perfect band-aid for our greenhouse emissions problem.



i agree, fuck all that wind and solar shit, they're horribly inefficient. we should be funding research for fusion technology.

and don't forget about geo-thermal too. probably the best thing we can invest in right now.


--------------------
Everybody's a ninja...

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: Zerolive]
    #11212092 -

Why bomb the moon? Free some water here on Earth. :earth:


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: AlteredAgain]
    #11212180 -

i thought the moon was our asteroid protector.... shooting at it is probably not smart!:albundy:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: P-O]
    #11212209 -

Another waste of money! How about using that money to clean the water here on Earth and make it free for all before looking for it on other extraterrestrial bodies?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: AlteredAgain]
    #11212221 -

These men are doing science. It is not their job to clean up after our shit.


--------------------
Weedmaster P knows the truth.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: Morgenstern]
    #11212250 -

Mataspore said:
Waste of our tax payer dollars! Gerr gerr!



80 million and that isnt including the private funds they received.

I know this rocket which BTW is as strong as 2 plutonium armed warheads.

India knows there was water. We have the ocean and we could make distilization plants.

There is an alternate agenda. Why are they crashing the satellite into it right after?

Does anyone know about the plaque left by neil armstrong? it reads "Here men from planet earth first set foot upon the moon. July 1969 a.d. we came in peace for all mankind."

Now they are going to put the human touch to the moon. I hate this god damn government.


--------------------



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: laserpig]
    #11212255 -

Who's job is it?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: djmako7]
    #11212315 -

NASA is the Air and Space Administration, not the Solve All The World's Problems Bureau.
The latter organization does not exist, and if you want it to then you'd better start yourself a grassroots movement or something.

I'm not saying moon research is "as important as" preventing a global climate crisis, but it's what NASA does, and removing funding from one of the few great large-scale scientific organizations in the world is NOT a step in the right direction towards addressing large-scale scientific problems.


--------------------
Weedmaster P knows the truth.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: laserpig]
    #11212317 -

djmako7 said:
There is an alternate agenda. Why are they crashing the satellite into it right after?



They're letting the main module crash because before it does it will have all the time it needs to transmit the mission's data back to Earth.
This allows them to plan a much simpler flightpath and avoid the significant expense of recovering a satellite when they don't need to.


--------------------
Weedmaster P knows the truth.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: laserpig]
    #11212323 -

laserpig said:
These men are doing science. It is not their job to clean up after our shit.




LOL "these men are doing science"

So tell me what science are they doing?

These men know what the moon is made of, they have robots that can go there and collect data like the mars missions.

BTW did you guys know they launched that shit months ago june 18th to be exact?

Why wasn't this info in the media then?

the government can's find osama, they can't fix they economy but they can launch a missile "rocket" at the moon. Amazing.

12 tons of hydrogen to hit the moon in 5 hours 17 minutes.


--------------------



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: djmako7]
    #11212375 -

No, "the govenment" cannot "launch a missile" at the moon. NASA is not "the government," they're a scientific agency which pretty much follows its own agenda (as it should).
You can call it a missile, but I maintain that this is a distortion of words. The LCROSS impactor is not even close to a weapon.


--------------------
Weedmaster P knows the truth.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Bombing the MOON [Re: djmako7]
    #11212380 -

djmako7 said:
80 million and that isnt including the private funds they received.

I know this rocket which BTW is as strong as 2 plutonium armed warheads.



You have no idea WTF you are talking about

Quote:
India knows there was water. We have the ocean and we could make distilization plants.



:dudewtf:
They are not looking for water for the people of earth.
They are looking to see if there is enough subsurface water for a base there.

Quote:
There is an alternate agenda. Why are they crashing the satellite into it right after?



The second satellite is collecting the data from the explosion to see what the water content is.
It will send the information back to earth before it too crashes into the moon



























Reading is fundamental


--------------------
Live for the moment you are in now
Don't be bogged down by your past
Don't be afraid of what lies in your future

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Holy SHIT!! FBI found first "dirty bomb" made for use on US, soil! ThirdEyeOpening 784 13 03/13/09 03:04 PM
by Moniker_Mike
* U.S. Planning Base on Moon To Prepare for Trip to Mars
( 1 2 3 all )
VoidOfsPg 4,303 45 03/26/06 06:38 PM
by DoctorJ
* 7 day stays on the moon by 2018 DNKYD 962 4 09/16/05 11:19 AM
by trendal
* Russian thermobaric "vacuum bombs" being used in Syrian residential areas.
( 1 2 3 all )
AsanteM 2,108 43 03/06/18 06:53 PM
by Stonehenge
* Earth and Moon as Viewed from Mars mjshroomer 1,637 16 05/25/03 03:11 AM
by Rhizoid
* Giant Underground Chamber Found On Moon By India's Chandrayaan Spacecraft
( 1 2 all )
sunset_mission 2,583 20 03/07/11 04:13 PM
by Larrythescaryrex
* Homemade Spacecraft DeadHearts 1,091 13 10/20/10 03:27 AM
by Flop Johnson
* Spacecraft... SSM_Arts 808 10 07/27/08 05:43 AM
by WakeboardrB

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
6,538 topic views. 5 members, 41 guests and 50 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.031 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 16 queries.