Anonymous #6 said:
lol.. alex jones. possibly the only person on earth crazier than you are for listening to him
scientific response 
Quote:
building 7 was not "pulled" but rather, emergency crews were pulled OUT of building 7 because it became apparent that the fires that were ignited in the building, in addition to the damage sustained by debris from the twin towers' collapse, had weakened the structure of building 7 to the point where collapse was unavoidable.
simple untrue, yes the people were told to leave, because they were going to pull the building. The emergency workers told people to get back because the building was about to be pulled.
Quote:
read up about it a bit, the sprinkler system in 7 was totally fucking inadequate and just flat out did not work.
Doesn't matter, the fires were not that bad. Building 7 was one of the most structurally sound buildings there was. Even larger buildings without decent sprinkler systems have burned for weeks without problems. Those fires lasted a few hours... speaking of fire, firefighters reported the fires in the twin towers were largely out anyway. Anyway, little debris touched building seven, the buildings around the twin towers that had huge rubble land on them stayed put fine with much worse fires.
Quote:
and thermite was present on site BECAUSE THERMITE IS JUST ALUMINUM AND IRON OXIDE, AKA RUST, both materials that would have been present in spades both within the buildings and the jets. And what kind of computers did they have inside those offices, anyway? There could have been Macs present with a wonderful magnesium case.. which would burn hot as hell. Magnesium's one of the simplest 'fuses' used to ignite thermite bombs.
Fair enough that it could be the source in theory, the columns however were still cut, and thermite is still the best means to do it.
Quote:
Stop parroting whackos.
[Quote:
flash=425,344]http://www.youtube.com/v/WZ8wlKK15JM&fs=1&autoplay=1[/flash]
Do you see any fucking demolition charges going off? NO
Aah the bbc, the same people that reported building 7 fell before it actually did by 20 minutes twice even with the view right in the backround. I don't have the videos on hand that show what I describe, I will hunt if I have time.
Quote:
Does it look like an implosion? NO, there's fucking debris flying all over the place.
Who said it had to be a standard take down of the towers? Now that would just be plain suspicious if planes can make a building implode.
Quote:
Does it look like it's falling at 9.8m/s^2? No, the debris flying off of it falls faster than the location the debris fell off of, therefor the actual building was falling slower than freefall.
I have not personally done the math, but as I understand it was near free fall as many beams were cut, but as far as I have learned, it was not exactly free fall, just quicker than the normal pancake theory could ever explain.
Couple more things to ponder by the way, Norad told to stand down multiple times? A drill that was just like a 9/11 scenario at the same time? (kinda of like the london bombings) Swiss papers reporting close ups of the plane that hit one of the towers show the underbelly had been modified.
The U.S. is not foreign to inside jobs and false flags, in fact if northwoods went through as planned, it would just have been another case of the powers that be trying to terrorize its own people.
Just a side note, even if the government wasn't behind it, it sure failed to do the right things after it. Still though, evidence still points to false flag, there is just too many random holes in the official story.
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Spores for European Microscopy 
North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies 
Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale 
Bulk Cannabis Seeds
Edit 
Reply 
Anonymous
1 2 all )