Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck, Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: Icelander]
    #7485774 -

biocentrism...
does this "discovery" or "theory" seem absurdly obvious to anyone else?

perhaps spirit can be so inanimate in consciousness that it can enact its motions upon reality without knowing its causing change.
Thats basically rock or stone consciousness.

so there is a fluctuation of all things,frequencies of connectivity, to certain structures and orders like creatures there is usually a constant of property and behaviour, this is a self sustaining channel of order (it moves, manipulates objects,has an internality of thought that operates in very diverse waves and matrixes), it (creatures) exist purely because it survives, it is not dematerialized, deconstructed, its a paradigm of activity within "reality" that generates its own extension.
(And not necessarily "into" or "forward" into "time", it is growing, which doesnt presume to say that "growth" occurs in reverse simultaneously)
From a more "physical" perspective the biological organism is a semi-fluid semi-solid mediator of elements on a proportional scale, which its spectrum of interaction continues to expand (physically and proportionally) with technology.
It is spirit in which consciousness can also "expand" its spectrality, given there is actually a substance in that geyser or vortex of near oblivion (lack of true novel sense) to attract to and begin feeding the new form of mind and existance.

Choice as directed by the illusory concentration of experiences and phenomena infected with ripples of defined form (a.k.a. self) seems to be only fractionally accurate.

What is controlled, controls the controller in the very premise of interaction.

No choice is made without the input of option and state.
Otherwise it is not "choice" but some form of eruption of existance.
To define it as directed by will is to say there is a will that has a foundation to direct from, which would of course be choice, which would be of course be determined by the foundation of option and state.

"self" is a sense of the mass manifestation of activity in mind, effected by its overall input, its sequence or method of motion/change of known artifacts of thought characterize "persona".
It is a constant cocreative anomaly with all "externalities" (if divisions between spirit and the beyond can ever be absolute, which fundamentally seems impossible)

the arrow paradox assumed that time could be frozen, it was a hypothetical prerequisite to continue considering the paradox.
motion doesnt seem to ever -freeze-
its continuing...to move...still so...

consciousness is .... AHHHHHJKDJKD!!! experience?!
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!multi level switch rearrange....its all reality converging in on a sub-level organizer, but a receptor for signals from the true infinite and beautiful essences of all


--------------------


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: MushroomTrip]
    #7485873 -

Your point is irrelevant and out of context.

I am talking about that which cannot be explained. I do NOT believe the mind can understand the vastness of everything through a mere explanation. Nature cannot be fully translated into words.

shakercee originally stated -

That's a scary realization to most humans. That prompts us to search for someone who is all-encompassing, omnipotent, to assure ourselves, okay there is someone or a group (read channeling) who can explain the design to us and where we fit in.

We can ask questions about the design, and we may get an answer. But is this answer going to take us to a full awareness and understanding of the design? Can the vast and all-encompassing design of nature be grasped by the questioning and answering mind? Believing it can is fooling oneself, IME.

My experience is unexplainable. Period!


--------------------

Strive to be more than a codified manifestation of a generalized technological consciousness

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: onlynow]
    #7485902 -

Quote:
Your point is irrelevant and out of context.

I am talking about that which cannot be explained. I do NOT believe the mind can understand the vastness of everything through a mere explanation. Nature cannot be fully translated into words.



No, you said:

Quote:
the inner child knows that this search for answers only brings more questions.


Next time maybe try to express yourself better. :smirk:

Quote:
We can ask questions about the design, and we may get an answer. But is this answer going to take us to a full awareness and understanding of the design? Can the vast and all-encompassing design of nature be grasped by the questioning and answering mind? Believing it can is fooling oneself, IME.


And tell me exactly where did I state that we can know everything with our minds? Maybe we can and maybe we can't. We have insufficient date to conclude in either direction.
But we DO make progresses. Thinking has has turned out to be good after all, even some believe that it's a waste of time. :rolleyes:
It might be true that we're only at the beginning of the path to Knowledge and Understanding, however we know more than we did in the past and this makes us more able to improve the quality of this life. For those want of course. :smirk:


--------------------
:bunny::bunnyhug:
All this time I've loved you
And never known your face
All this time I've missed you
And searched this human race
Here is true peace
Here my heart knows calm
Safe in your soul
Bathed in your sighs
:bunnyhug: :yinyang2:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: MushroomTrip]
    #7485992 -

MushroomTrip said:
Next time maybe try to express yourself better. :smirk:


I must be a very confusing person :smile:

Eh, not everybody can understand everybody. 


the inner child knows that this search for answers only brings more questions.

When I search for answers, my life does not improve, it only gets more confusing :wink: 

Quote:
It might be true that we're only at the beginning of the path to Knowledge and Understanding, however we know more than we did in the past


I think we knew more when our minds weren't so conditioned :rofl2:


--------------------

Strive to be more than a codified manifestation of a generalized technological consciousness

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: onlynow]
    #7486002 -

Even Socrates stated he knew nothing. Thinking we know stuff is just another illusion. I mean I know what a pencil is. But do I really know. Can I really fully grasp the knowledge and information contained within the pencil? My mind can think it can, yet this knowledge is but an illusion.


--------------------

Strive to be more than a codified manifestation of a generalized technological consciousness

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: onlynow]
    #7486025 -

onlynow said:
MushroomTrip said:
Next time maybe try to express yourself better. :smirk:


I must be a very confusing person :smile:

Eh, not everybody can understand everybody. 


the inner child knows that this search for answers only brings more questions.

When I search for answers, my life does not improve, it only gets more confusing :wink: 



Quote:
It might be true that we're only at the beginning of the path to Knowledge and Understanding, however we know more than we did in the past


I think we knew more when our minds weren't so conditioned :rofl2:


The more I learned the more I suffered it seemed for many years. Lately though the ship seems to be on course. Give it some more time, (20 to 30 years) and then see how it is.;)

We may never know what an unconditioned mind is like. It most likely was a mixed bag also.


--------------------
"Don't believe everything you think". -Anom.

" All that lives was born to die"-Anom.

With much wisdom comes much sorrow,
The more knowledge, the more grief.
Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: onlynow]
    #7486068 -

onlynow said:
Even Socrates stated he knew nothing.  Thinking we know stuff is just another illusion.  I mean I know what a pencil is.  But do I really know.  Can I really fully grasp the knowledge and information contained within the pencil?  My mind can think it can, yet this knowledge is but an illusion.


And you just determined that with your mind. :smirk:


--------------------
:bunny::bunnyhug:
All this time I've loved you
And never known your face
All this time I've missed you
And searched this human race
Here is true peace
Here my heart knows calm
Safe in your soul
Bathed in your sighs
:bunnyhug: :yinyang2:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: Icelander]
    #7486069 -

Icelander said:
We may never know what an unconditioned mind is like. It most likely was a mixed bag also.


No, not until we go back in time before there were space ships, computers, television, vehicles, society, language, tree of knowledge, etc.
My conditioning already occurred, and it will most likely be a part of me till the day I day. At least I am aware of the fact.


--------------------

Strive to be more than a codified manifestation of a generalized technological consciousness

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: MushroomTrip]
    #7486081 -

MushroomTrip said:
onlynow said:
Even Socrates stated he knew nothing.  Thinking we know stuff is just another illusion.  I mean I know what a pencil is.  But do I really know.  Can I really fully grasp the knowledge and information contained within the pencil?  My mind can think it can, yet this knowledge is but an illusion.


And you just determined that with your mind. :smirk:


But you see how well his mind works?:tongue2:


--------------------
"Don't believe everything you think". -Anom.

" All that lives was born to die"-Anom.

With much wisdom comes much sorrow,
The more knowledge, the more grief.
Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: Icelander]
    #7486087 -

I do :sherlock:


--------------------
:bunny::bunnyhug:
All this time I've loved you
And never known your face
All this time I've missed you
And searched this human race
Here is true peace
Here my heart knows calm
Safe in your soul
Bathed in your sighs
:bunnyhug: :yinyang2:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: MushroomTrip]
    #7486103 -

There is no pencil.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: A New Theory of the Universe [Re: Icelander]
    #7486122 -

My mind don't work like most minds :frown:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]

Shop: Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck, Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag

General Interest > Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The One (Uni) Fact. The Uni (1) Theory Explained. Armageddon 2,605 13 06/08/11 08:10 PM
by NikoK
* Physicists: "Reality is an illusion!"
( 1 2 all )		 exclusive58 3,447 29 10/10/05 10:13 AM
by Gomp
* bummer....a McKenna prediction's already wrong
( 1 2 3 all )		 question_for_joo 7,249 51 03/20/05 03:19 PM
by Gomp
* String theory
( 1 2 all )		 MOTH 2,132 24 01/05/05 02:34 AM
by shroomydan
* The GOD particle Scarfmeister 1,814 12 08/21/04 08:54 PM
by trendal
* String Theory is messed up! nubious 2,876 19 09/15/09 10:09 PM
by DieCommie
* The approaching revolution in particle physics distortopia 1,354 16 09/14/05 02:55 PM
by IgnatiusJReilly
* A very simple theory on the Big Bang *DELETED*
( 1 2 all )		 lukeboots 3,248 21 06/30/04 11:48 PM
by NariusFractal

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
5,322 topic views. 1 members, 289 guests and 33 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.012 seconds on 17 queries.