Home | Community | Message Board

Kratom Eye
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Myyco.com Shop: Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Classifications and Groups
    #5189839 -

Should you look at things from a whole, or discern the contents into individual parts? To see what parts to accept, and which to reject? Is it important to step back at and look at a situation as a whole macrosystem, or going in the system itself, deciding what to take and what to leave? Does accepting groupings as one ever serve a purpose?

I often hear people say, "After taking psychedelics, how can you think that?", or "How can you listen to punk and not drink?". It's like these culture cliques come in little tiny packages, and you cant throw parts out or construct anything new.

To appoint another anecdote to convey my case in point, my brother gave me these "chinese chi meditation spheres" for Christmas. It came with a little manual of their use that talked about several things on the spheres themselves, meditation and the like. Then it started talking about the five elements. I thought it'd be, as I formulate my beliefs, Fire; Water; Fire; Earth and Life Energy, but instead it was Fire, Water, Wood, Earth, and Metal.

I couldnt get over how they could classify Wood itself as an element. Then why isnt plastic an element? Or smoke? You dont need fire to make smoke. Or why isnt helium or hydrogen up there?

There's always more to the package. Even the table of elements leaves room for improvement and addition.

By accepting the whole, you're only isolating yourself in a fortress of usage of information you already possess. And feeding off your own knowledge will eventually lead to starvation.


--------------------
010001100100001001000101!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Classifications and Groups [Re: Fospher]
    #5192053 -

Fospher said:
Should you look at things from a whole, or discern the contents into individual parts? To see what parts to accept, and which to reject? Is it important to step back at and look at a situation as a whole macrosystem, or going in the system itself, deciding what to take and what to leave? Does accepting groupings as one ever serve a purpose?



From my own perspective I'll say that reminds me of the macro of the Tao and distancing oneself versus perhaps forgetting about the big picture and immersing oneself. Certainly all of us reading this are immersing ourselves to some degree so I'd guess that immersion contains a higher entertainment value. At the same time distancing oneself can have a calming, grounding and centering effect when immersion becomes too chaotic for one's level of (understanding?)


Fospher said:
By accepting the whole, you're only isolating yourself in a fortress of usage of information you already possess. And feeding off your own knowledge will eventually lead to starvation.



Good point. Yes I agree that immersion is probably inevitable no matter how advanced an entity becomes.


--------------------
Let it not be remembered
That mycelium eats detritus and dies
But that life in all it's glory
Counts mycelium to be on it's side.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Classifications and Groups [Re: Fospher]
    #5192339 -

"do both, ...and then some!"
.. ;p

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Classifications and Groups [Re: Fospher]
    #5193080 -

Quote:
Should you look at things from a whole, or discern the contents into individual parts?



How about parts of a whole.  See the part and see it in relation to the whole. 

Quote:
To see what parts to accept, and which to reject? Is it important to step back at and look at a situation as a whole macrosystem, or going in the system itself, deciding what to take and what to leave? Does accepting groupings as one ever serve a purpose?



When I play poker I have to look at my cards as part of the deck.  What the probabilities are of my hand being completed or just winning by other cards in the deck.  With that said I don't want to advocate the judgement of certain parts, but the awareness of them in relation to the whole.

Quote:
"How can you listen to punk and not drink?". It's like these culture cliques come in little tiny packages, and you cant throw parts out or construct anything new.



Are you saying that the counter-culture is in fact itself a culture and that a true "counter-culturist"(Word?) would not prescribe himself cultural boundaries but in fact create his own? :smirk:


--------------------
Trust thyself.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Myyco.com Shop: Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* "Fat Acceptance" Groups Silversoul 1,041 11 08/04/05 04:22 PM
by Veritas
* Acceptance & Surrender
( 1 2 all )
SkorpivoMusterion 2,327 20 11/07/04 05:26 AM
by FreakQlibrium
* The Devils Element? Mycomancer 1,917 15 07/21/05 11:41 AM
by DoctorJ
* classification and discourse Positronius 277 0 01/11/04 02:54 PM
by Positronius
* Accept him as savior or go to hell?
( 1 2 3 4 all )
trippysmurf 5,781 72 05/08/04 03:40 PM
by fearfect
* group experiments in reality control truekimbo2 1,597 17 05/24/06 05:33 AM
by truekimbo2
* Missing Elements Lightningfractal 673 2 10/20/03 09:40 AM
by Seuss
* If you were an element, what you be, and why? What are the characteristics of your element?
( 1 2 all )
flowstone 2,700 25 05/10/05 12:00 AM
by SneezingPenis

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
404 topic views. 0 members, 34 guests and 6 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.025 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 16 queries.