musiclover420 said:

Tulipslave said:

doesn't fucking matter.  this is all purely political, as Kavanaugh is already a justice on the second highest court in the land, with no public bru-hah-hah made over his appointment then or to any other court system.  Ford's dad is CIA, and Ford is a staunch Democrat.


Kavanaugh is almost certainly an offender in some form or fashion, but it's irrelevant to his ability as a judge.  Did Clinton's various ACTIVE sexual assaults prevent him from being President?


Men rape women.  Women rape men.  Men rape men.  Women rape women.  They all TRY to rape each other. "Sexual assault" abounds, and it works all ways. This is humanity, folks.  Get the fuck over it.  Look to the bonobo.

---

You clearly haven't paid much attention to this...



And for the 3rd time, Ford is one of 5 accusers now. Are they all Democrat shills?

Also seems funny how if Kav is innocent he is so against an investigation, meanwhile Ford is all for one. She has the most to lose by lying.

PS, clinton has absolutely nothing to do with this. Though sidenote, Kav was one of the people who questioned Clinton about his sexual scandal, which was around the time he was apparently gang raping women at parties...

Once key Clinton questioner, Kavanaugh under cringeworthy scrutiny

Quote:

Twenty years ago a sitting US president, Bill Clinton, was ordered to answer a series of excruciating questions about his sexual relationship with a 22-year-old intern.

Some of those questions were drafted by a young attorney named Brett Kavanaugh, who in a painfully awkward coincidence faced a similar onslaught of invasive queries Thursday from senators considering whether he should be confirmed to the US Supreme Court.

---

---

quite the contrary; i've kept up with it all along



also, Clinton had more than just the Monica Lewinsky "scandal", which was not a sexual assault issue, on his plate.  You should do some research.

badchad said:

TheFakeSunRa said:

Her traumatic event is being dry humped while another boy jumped on the bed until he rolled off and they walked away laughing.

---

If a man held you down, dry humped you, covered your mouth so you couldn't scream while a friend jumped on the bed and you thought they were both going to double team you...Would you brush it off as "no biggie?"

---

Burke Dennings said:

badchad said:

TheFakeSunRa said:

Her traumatic event is being dry humped while another boy jumped on the bed until he rolled off and they walked away laughing.

---

If a man held you down, dry humped you, covered your mouth so you couldn't scream while a friend jumped on the bed and you thought they were both going to double team you...Would you brush it off as "no biggie?"

---

It’s funny- I’ve seen TheFakeSunRa talk about how remarkably badass he can be in fantasy situations plenty over the years, so it’s interesting to see that when it’s a woman getting molested, he thinks she should just forget about it.  It’s almost like he feels it’s okay for men to sexually assault a woman, as long as it doesn’t go across a certain line.

---

Tulipslave said:

Kavanaugh is almost certainly an offender in some form or fashion, but it's irrelevant to his ability as a judge.  Did Clinton's various ACTIVE sexual assaults prevent him from being President?


Men rape women.  Women rape men.  Men rape men.  Women rape women.  They all TRY to rape each other. "Sexual assault" abounds, and it works all ways. This is humanity, folks.  Get the fuck over it.  Look to the bonobo.

---

ReposadoXochipilli said:

Tulipslave said:

Kavanaugh is almost certainly an offender in some form or fashion, but it's irrelevant to his ability as a judge.  Did Clinton's various ACTIVE sexual assaults prevent him from being President?


Men rape women.  Women rape men.  Men rape men.  Women rape women.  They all TRY to rape each other. "Sexual assault" abounds, and it works all ways. This is humanity, folks.  Get the fuck over it.  Look to the bonobo.

---

i personally would rather the judge not be a sexual preditor if i have any say in it. i really don't think rape is nearly as common as you might be thinking for whatever reason and even if it was rape is about as far from humanity as you can get.

i just don't get any of that rational, should we be like seahorses and the males can start carrying the babies?

---

ReposadoXochipilli said:

i don't think realizing the hypocrisy of this situation is a personal projection it is just logic when it comes to ethics involved with a position of judging laws and others.

is it your informed, un-opinionated, un-emotional judgement that we should all just be ok with rapes and be ready to engage in any sexual contact due to the example of hyper sexualized monkeys?

---

Fiery said:

I hear ya. I mean I think it's a low blow to come forward 35 years later..

BUT.. if it IS true, I say roast the mah fukka and ruin his career.

---

I was sexually assaulted by a "friend" who was a super popular jock from a wealthy famliy over 20 years ago, and I have literally NEVER told anyone - not my parents, not my boyfriend, not my therapist, not even any of my closest friends.

I'm sure he would have denied it if I did, so it was easier to shove it deep down into my subconscious than actually deal with the fact that someone I trusted violated me sexually while they thought I was sleeping. 

Practically every woman I know has been raped or sexually assaulted/abused at some point in her life. The way Dr. Ford is being treated is EXACTLY the reason we don't say anything, and it's depressing to me to see so many of you defending him instead of believing her.



I have never wanted to share the details of my assault with anyone, but if the man who assaulted me was about to be given a lifetime job in the SUPREME COURT, that would be the time I'd come forward.

ReposadoXochipilli said:

ok gotchya, i just didn't understand what exactly you were saying. i agree that 100% proof would be preferable but will not be a reality in this case. again this is about his nomination not a criminal trial so i don't think the same criteria applies in an identical manner as it isn't a conviction attempt.

i think the 2+2 is closer to 5 then it is to a zero regardless if it isn't a slam dunk 5. maybe i have wool over my eyes but from what i have seen it appears he has lied multiple times and is refusing to clear air. honestly i am not really familiar with how this process would normally go let alone with the elephant and donkey show shitting all over the whole thing.

i attempt to be rational when thinking about issues and subjects but i am only human and of course have innate bias.

---

CHeifM4sterDiezL said:

theres come pretty solid evidence that this dewd is a sleazeball dewd

---

SARAtonin said:

I think it’s pretty funny Fox is trying to criticize Rosie O’Donnell for using if a “gay slur” against Graham,
It’s like, you all know she’s gay, right?

---

CHeifM4sterDiezL said:

theres come pretty solid evidence that this dewd is a sleazeball dewd

---

Violent drunk? Check.

Multiple sexual assault accusations? Check.

200k in dept for "baseball tickets"? Check.

Says the president can't be indicted and was personally chosen by trump? Check.

Wants to overturn Roe v Wade and is a complete political hack? Check.

... Etc. This guy is a grimy slimebag, dozens of people have come forward corroborating the assault claims, saying he was often a violent drunk who would get blacked out. He also made it pretty clear at the hearing how he treats women.



Guess which one is his wife. the brunette on the left of him