Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore Bulk Substrate   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |  [ show all ]
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Dagr]
    #25140598 -

Lots of people have exposed the lie and still live. They only kill those who are a direct threat to the power structure. Trump is in danger but I am not, neither are the others who try to tell the truth.

The evidence is right there, when thousands of highly trained experts tell us it didn't happen that way, that is indisputable. But since the deep state and media want us to believe the lie, the truth remains buried.

How many here still think oswald did it all to jfk? How many think assad is stupid enough to have used chem weapons when he was winning with conventional weapons and knew he would get bombed if he used chems? The only ones desperate enough to pull it off are isis and related groups which are trying to overthrow him and are losing bad

The govt tells lots of lies, saying mj is harmful and has no medical value just for example. Trump says the opposite which is good. He is going to allow the states to do their thing.

@psi
I don't know why they did #7 or why they did the towers for that matter. Preparing us for war is a possible explanation. I heard the jew who owned the towers collected big on insurance, not sure if thats true.


--------------------
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835)

Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Stonehenge] * 1
    #25140632 -

How many of them are actually structural engineers?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Asante]
    #25140666 -

Asante said:
Somebody is posting a controversial opinion in the Post A Controversial Opinion time and everybody wants to debunk it. Thats not what this topic is for.

Fart a controversial opinion into this topic please.


"Teenagers should have access to age appropriate pornography that among things has educational value to convey realistic life-affirming expectations in regards to sexuality, to avoid them being subjected to the vile soulless exploitation/degradation raunch of the adult porn industry, made by directors decades deeper into their perversion, involving actors of an age they quite frankly should have no sexual thoughts about whatsoever."


Was that so hard? :cookiemonster:



Wiccan Seeker pls.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Asante]
    #25140703 -

Asante said:
Bill_Oreilly said:
Asante...do you think 911 was an inside job?




I believe forces within the intelligence community knew what was going to happen and they made sure the terrorists would stand a chance - because the attack was extremely convenient for them to both hogtie the american population by taking much of their freedom and strengthening the police/military force for the big economic crisis to come, at the same time it wa a great excuse for wars which were very profitable for the right people.

They basically let some thugs burn the barn down to collect insurance money, by letting them proceed when they could have stopped them.

What do you believe?




That is pretty much my opinion of the FDR Pearl Harbor theory. I also think he was the greatest President of the 20th century. It's hard to reconcile the loss of lives, but you can't argue with the results.


--------------------
"The Rolling Stones will break up over Brian Jones' dead body"    John Lennon

I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.

Simulacrum
The truth which conceals that there is none

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Stonehenge]
    #25140725 -

Stonehenge said:
Lots of people have exposed the lie and still live. They only kill those who are a direct threat to the power structure. Trump is in danger but I am not, neither are the others who try to tell the truth.

The evidence is right there, when thousands of highly trained experts tell us it didn't happen that way, that is indisputable. But since the deep state and media want us to believe the lie, the truth remains buried.

How many here still think oswald did it all to jfk? How many think assad is stupid enough to have used chem weapons when he was winning with conventional weapons and knew he would get bombed if he used chems? The only ones desperate enough to pull it off are isis and related groups which are trying to overthrow him and are losing bad

The govt tells lots of lies, saying mj is harmful and has no medical value just for example. Trump says the opposite which is good. He is going to allow the states to do their thing.




No, a lot of people have espoused a conspiracy theory that doesn't have any undisputed evidence supporting it.

And if people did have undisputed evidence, were telling everyone about it, and still nothing was done to the people who were behind 9/11, then what's the point to beating a dead horse?

Either way, dude, you have to look at your pros and cons.

Pros - Expose "lies", just like thousands of other people are doing and aren't believed by the majority of people.  So no real pro here.  You don't get shit.

Cons - 1.) A lot of people will think you're a quack (AKA Conspiracy Nutjob).  2.)Big waste of time that doesn't accomplish diddly.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Dagr]
    #25140732 -

If i'm remembering correctly, only about 30 structural engineers support the "controlled demolition" hypothesis

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Dagr]
    #25140796 -

>No, a lot of people have espoused a conspiracy theory that doesn't have any undisputed evidence supporting it.

The conspiracy theory is that only the ones who flew the planes were behind it. Also that the buildings fell from a minor fire etc. There is plenty of dispute over the govt story

>And if people did have undisputed evidence, were telling everyone about it,

Nothing is undisputed, you should know that. In a trial they don't have one side with undisputed evidence, all is disputed and you have to look at the evidence with open eyes and use logic plus common sense

>and still nothing was done to the people who were behind 9/11, then what's the point to beating a dead horse?

Nothing was done because the deep state is involved and they told the media what to say about it. I agree nothing probably will be done that does not mean we should accept lies. I have photos I will post for fools to sneer at but a few will look and see what I mean


--------------------
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835)

Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Stonehenge]
    #25140801 -

Stonehenge said:
>No, a lot of people have espoused a conspiracy theory that doesn't have any undisputed evidence supporting it.

The conspiracy theory is that only the ones who flew the planes were behind it. Also that the buildings fell from a minor fire etc. There is plenty of dispute over the govt story

>And if people did have undisputed evidence, were telling everyone about it,

Nothing is undisputed, you should know that. In a trial they don't have one side with undisputed evidence, all is disputed and you have to look at the evidence with open eyes and use logic plus common sense

>and still nothing was done to the people who were behind 9/11, then what's the point to beating a dead horse?

Nothing was done because the deep state is involved and they told the media what to say about it. I agree nothing probably will be done that does not mean we should accept lies. I have photos I will post for fools to sneer at but a few will look and see what I mean



Accept it or not, all you are doing is lowering a lot people's opinion of you.  You gain nothing.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Dagr]
    #25140814 -

Enjoying the feeling you get when you take a shit means you would also enjoy the feeling of a dick up your ass

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Dagr]
    #25140821 -

Here is a photo of the tehran building that fell after burning fiercely for a long time



You see twisted girders, remains of the building and its still about 4 stories high. Now here we see building 7. All that is left is rubble less than 1 story tall. Tell me its the same thing? Plus the fact 7 only burned a few hours, the whole building was not engulfed in flame like in tehran



>all you are doing is lowering a lot people's opinion of you.  You gain nothing.

If stupid people refuse to look at evidence then I don't care about their opinion. Why do you choose to believe lies? So stupid people will like you?


--------------------
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835)

Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Stonehenge] * 1
    #25140836 -

They weren't the same exact building under the same exact conditions. You shouldn't expect them to look exactly the same afterward. That's absurd reasoning.

And why do so few structural engineers support your position?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Stonehenge]
    #25140949 -

Stonehenge said:
If stupid people refuse to look at evidence then I don't care about their opinion. Why do you choose to believe lies? So stupid people will like you?



I knew you were going to say that.

Plenty of intelligent people realize there is nothing to gain by raving about conspiracy theories.

If you don't realize that, maybe they aren't the stupid ones.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Stonehenge]
    #25140964 -

I think i'll go ahead and put my confidence behind the vast majority of structural engineers who have looked at the evidence

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Sir Selzir] * 1
    #25141017 -

Sir Selzir said:
Enjoying the feeling you get when you take a shit means you would also enjoy the feeling of a dick up your ass


I think it's probably more like the feeling of getting a dick out of your ass.


--------------------


"Rape ... Is a... can of apples" -Fiery

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Dagr]
    #25141030 -

So asking people to look at the evidence is "raving"? We should just take the word of govt and the media without question then? Ok got it.

Apples, show some evidence of the majority of engineers endorsing that conclusion?


--------------------
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835)

Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Stonehenge]
    #25141201 -

Meanwhile in the USA civilians are killing lots of civilians without help from those terrorists!

must have good gun laws!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Robo] * 1
    #25149224 -

Robo Shaman said:
What would you do if you were asked to give up your dreams for freedom what would you do if asked to make the ultimate sacrifice? Fredom isn’t free. It take folks like you and Me.





--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: tyrannicalrex] * 2
    #25149976 -

Abortions should be mandatory after two kids max

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: Sir Selzir]
    #25150033 -

:justno:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Controversial opinion time [Re: LogicaL Chaos]
    #25150767 -

The moon is hollow

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |  [ show all ]

Shop: North Spore Bulk Substrate   Myyco.com Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Even Raptors Want To Know: What Do They Mean?
( 1 2 all )
PapaverS 3,044 22 07/27/10 09:00 PM
by Papaver
* Deltron Cowgold 621 6 09/02/05 09:41 PM
by Vulture
* You haven't lived until you've tried Keith's Cookies Hyper_Panda_GO 818 11 05/09/07 01:55 PM
by DrCamacho89
* Keith Richards GGreatOne234 822 8 02/06/08 12:39 PM
by wrestler_az
* Keith Jarret Krishna 397 1 06/24/04 12:05 PM
by HeavenlyBlue
* New users' opinions
( 1 2 all )
DNKYD 2,998 21 09/28/06 01:31 PM
by Geneephurr
* Boondocks, my opinion (doesnt matter to anyone) *DELETED*
( 1 2 all )
friggest 2,635 23 11/08/05 07:14 PM
by friggest
* How much do you rely on other people's opinion of you?
( 1 2 all )
Twirling 3,572 22 06/16/05 10:43 PM
by mantis

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
2,418 topic views. 2 members, 74 guests and 136 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.03 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 16 queries.