Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

MagicBag.co Shop: Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 |  [ show all ]
It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar.
    #22552778 -

So we're all allowed to go around saying users are bad people without justification right? (I asked this because this is what Enlil did)

Quote:
Enlil(M) said:
Well, yeah...in general ratings, at least.  If someone thinks you're a bad person, they should be able to say so in a rating.  Otherwise, what's the point?  Mods aren't in the business of deciding what is and isn't true, so if a member thinks you're stupid, evil, racist, or whatever, they can express that opinion.  If we had to check every rating for accuracy, that'd be an impossible task.



I thought I should spread the word because there's a clear divide between people's understanding of this subject based on the poll here.
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/22552085


EDIT:
As answered by Administrator Ythan in the New 'rating content guidelines'(2010) http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/12328826#12328826

Q: So I can't leave bad ratings now?
A: Of course you can still leave bad ratings, and we hope you will when they're justified. However, ratings can no longer be abused solely to flame or troll other members. If you have a legitimate gripe with another member, rate them about it. But don't use the functionality as a toy, or as a way to circumvent existing rules about harassment.



It seems as though ratings have become nothing more than a toy. Soz Ythan.


Edited by sudly (11/21/15 05:59 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly]
    #22552851 -

...Uh I pretty much always rate people badly for one of two things. Clogging up threads with tons of nonesense or being a terrible person.

Whats your idea of qualification for a bad rating?


--------------------


A cautious young fellow named Lodge / Had seat belts installed in his Dodge. / When his date was strapped in / He committed a sin / Without even leaving the garage. That's clever, isn't it?-A boy and his dog

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly]
    #22552853 -

Dude wtf did you not read the reply in the other thread?


--------------------
I'm stupid, Enlil is smart.
I'm ugly, Enlil is beautiful.
I'm a loser, Enlil is a winner.
Someday, I hope to be like Enlil but secretly know I never will.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: bloodsheen]
    #22552858 -

Personally I don't rate people negatively unless there is an objective reason to do so. E.g. If they throw random negative ratings around or act immaturely and call people 'faggot', 'retard' etc in their comments.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: Malcolm_Xtasy]
    #22552862 -

I did read it but hadn't responded yet, I'm rather apathetic towards my own ratings now so I'm not bothered by it.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly]
    #22552883 -

Who cares? Opt out if you really care that much


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sh4d0ws]
    #22552892 -

I have no intention of opting out of ratings, this is meant to be insight for anyone who is unsure of what justifies a rating.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly]
    #22554086 -

If I could rate people I'd rate u 0 for no reason


--------------------

Stay far from timid, only make moves when your heart's in it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly]
    #22554106 -

How'd you get back up to 4 shrooms? I swear you were at 2 when Malcolm asked about your ratings in the other thread..

And really, you're going to pretend like you don't care about your ratings? :ilold: You've made 2 threads on it now. People who don't care about their ratings never even talk about them. They don't even opt out, because they don't care. There have been some people who don't care, with 4+ white shrooms, don't whine about their ratings, question whether it's allowed or make retaliatory ratings to those who rated them negatively.

You are far from those people. No one needed you to clear up what a justified rating is. The only people who may even think to ask such a thing are people who got a negative rating and want some excuse to have the mods erase it for them.

Also, I dunno what the chances of it happening now are, but a negative rating from Enlil doesn't always stick. He gave me a negative one at some point and it was gone a week later. Never asked anyone to remove it or said anything at all about it. I don't even know why he deleted it because I've never asked.


--------------------
With my face against the floor I can’t see who knocked me out of the way.
I don’t want to get back up but I have to so it might as well be today.
Nothing appeals to me no one feels like me, I’m too busy being calm to disappear.
I’m in no shape to be alone contrary to the shit that you might hear.


You can't wake up, this is not a dream. You're part of a machine, you are not a human being
With your face all made up, living on a screen. Low on self esteem, so you run on gasoline

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly] * 1
    #22554111 -

sudly said:
So we're all allowed to go around saying users are bad people without justification right? (I asked this because this is what Enlil did)

Quote:
Enlil(M) said:
Well, yeah...in general ratings, at least.  If someone thinks you're a bad person, they should be able to say so in a rating.  Otherwise, what's the point?  Mods aren't in the business of deciding what is and isn't true, so if a member thinks you're stupid, evil, racist, or whatever, they can express that opinion.  If we had to check every rating for accuracy, that'd be an impossible task.



I thought I should spread the word because there's a clear divide between people's understanding of this subject based on the poll here.
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/22552085


It seems as though ratings have become nothing more than a toy. Soz Ythan.

Q: So I can't leave bad ratings now?
A: Of course you can still leave bad ratings, and we hope you will when they're justified. However, ratings can no longer be abused solely to flame or troll other members. If you have a legitimate gripe with another member, rate them about it. But don't use the functionality as a toy, or as a way to circumvent existing rules about harassment.
http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/12328826#12328826






No. One. Cares.

Please melt harder in more forums so you can do us a favor and get yourself banned.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly]
    #22554117 -

Guys please rate op 0 he will melt like ice cream


--------------------

Stay far from timid, only make moves when your heart's in it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: Alexestalex]
    #22554120 -

Just finished rating the guy and saw your post. Be careful though, ratings raeps are being taken more seriously now. Just looking out brother.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: Alexestalex]
    #22554121 -

I save my negatives for those who truly deserve them. I'm following Vinsue's lead. The less you give them out, the stronger they become. I want to single-handedly knock someone down 2 whole shrooms with my rating alone. He even goes back through occasionally and deletes ones for inactive users to supercharge them.


--------------------
With my face against the floor I can’t see who knocked me out of the way.
I don’t want to get back up but I have to so it might as well be today.
Nothing appeals to me no one feels like me, I’m too busy being calm to disappear.
I’m in no shape to be alone contrary to the shit that you might hear.


You can't wake up, this is not a dream. You're part of a machine, you are not a human being
With your face all made up, living on a screen. Low on self esteem, so you run on gasoline

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: Shroomslip]
    #22554123 -

I go back and remove bad ones from perma people and puppets. They end up packing a wallop.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: Shroomslip]
    #22554144 -

I did care previously but I overvalued the rating system so now it's apathy.
I've been on this site for a while and didn't know precisely what was allowed for ratings, I'm sure I wasn't the only one.

The ratings I've received reflect more so on the users who gave them.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: Adden]
    #22554154 -

As a reply to your rating out of interest.
I'm sure there are some people who care for the insight, I cross posted threads as a reference because it adds substance to the topic I was discussing.

Out of curiosity I would also like to know how it aggravates staff so that I can avoid doing so in the future.


--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly]
    #22554162 -

sudly said:
The ratings I've received reflect more so on the users who gave them.



Not really. People don't generally just go around giving a bunch of people random bad ratings. They're almost always earned. Even with "rating rape". People usually only participate when they agree the poster is a douchebag. No one's going to give people bad ratings just because someone instituted a rating rape on that person, when they actually have no problem with that person.

I don't know why you got that many bad ratings back to back, I'm just going to assume it was deserved because I really don't care enough to go find out what it stemmed from.


--------------------
With my face against the floor I can’t see who knocked me out of the way.
I don’t want to get back up but I have to so it might as well be today.
Nothing appeals to me no one feels like me, I’m too busy being calm to disappear.
I’m in no shape to be alone contrary to the shit that you might hear.


You can't wake up, this is not a dream. You're part of a machine, you are not a human being
With your face all made up, living on a screen. Low on self esteem, so you run on gasoline

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly]
    #22554166 -

Generally people with high ratings are ass kissers it's all a big circle jerk anyway dw


--------------------

Stay far from timid, only make moves when your heart's in it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: Shroomslip]
    #22554176 -

"I don't know why you got that many bad ratings back to back, I'm just going to assume it was deserved because I really don't care enough to go find out what it stemmed from."

A user called emf began insulting me then gave me a negative rating. I reported it and it was initially removed which started this whole conundrum.

This is his third rating
Quote:
emf: 0
Negative rating
11/21/15 08:33 AM

Geokills has established that no reason is required for a negative rating.



"People don't generally just go around giving a bunch of people random bad ratings."
This was his first reasoning

Quote:
emf said:
I rated you negatively for being a drama queen.

Also because you are such a stupid faggot.




--------------------
I am whatever Darwin needs me to be.


Edited by sudly (11/24/15 12:07 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: It's settled, ratings require no justification if they aren't vulgar. [Re: sudly]
    #22554177 -

sudly said:
As a reply to your rating out of interest.
I'm sure there are some people who care for the insight, I cross posted threads as a reference because it adds substance to the topic I was discussing.

Out of curiosity I would also like to know how it aggravates staff so that I can avoid doing so in the future.



Cross posting the same thing in multiple forums is a good way to get warned/banned. It falls under spamming.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 |  [ show all ]

MagicBag.co Shop: Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* My first bad rating
( 1 2 3 all )
JettaJay 4,518 58 01/23/05 02:59 PM
by Thin White Duke
* Only 32 rates for the creator of the Shroomery??
( 1 2 all )
Jellric 4,530 26 01/18/05 09:20 PM
by Corporal Kielbasa
* Wheres everybodies rating shrooms at? pfshroomer 848 6 05/09/04 02:25 AM
by pfshroomer
* If it requires a uniform.... Wolfe3001 514 8 10/06/04 07:48 PM
by felix
* let's rate eachother
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )
cybrbeast 11,309 161 01/21/15 04:23 PM
by That Man
* Rate my Poem (Short Poem) Northernsoul 2,674 16 03/19/04 07:27 PM
by filthysock
* Negative General Ratings
( 1 2 all )
MizzJazzy 2,812 32 05/15/04 08:22 AM
by luvdemshrooms
* Got my first bad rating
( 1 2 all )
Thin White Duke 2,412 27 01/16/05 03:39 AM
by spud

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
1,812 topic views. 6 members, 279 guests and 76 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.041 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 18 queries.