YSHServant said:

akira_akuma said:

(not true)

---

Prove it.

---

YSHServant said:

This whole article is completely biased. If you are a liberal you're smarter?

You know which way this article swings.

---

akira_akuma said:

YSHServant said:

akira_akuma said:

(not true)

---

Prove it.

---

people that use logic and reason, as harbingers for truth and their intellect, are smarter then those who make up stuff based on their collective rationale for believing a book made a thousand years ago, and then basically revert to humanism when it provides pleasure to them while at the same time, scowling at others for doing the same, and then cry over spilled milk when you commit a sin; though you're allowed to... ect ect

---

akira_akuma said:

lets argue about it, for God's sake.

---

meams said:

YSHServant said:

This whole article is completely biased. If you are a liberal you're smarter?

You know which way this article swings.

---

no, silly person.  but thanks for proving the article's point.





it said the two are correlated.  correlation is not causation.  but thanks for showing (a) your lack of understanding of this differential and (b) your political alignment.

---

Yea, yea. Act like you know my political affiliation. I'm neither a conservative or a liberal. As a matter of fact I don't support ANY party. But when they are saying dumb shit like that, of course i'm going to say something.

akira_akuma said:

YSHServant said:

akira_akuma said:

(not true)

---

Prove it.

---

people that use logic and reason, as harbingers for truth and their intellect, are smarter then those who make up stuff based on their collective rationale for believing a book made a thousand years ago, and then basically revert to humanism when it provides pleasure to them while at the same time, scowling at others for doing the same, and then cry over spilled milk when you commit a sin; though you're allowed to... ect ect

---

That still does nothing to prove people who don't believe in God are smarter than those who do. It's your opinion. Speculation.

Patlal said:

YSHServant said:

This whole article is completely biased. If you are a liberal you're smarter?

You know which way this article swings.

---

Well if the candidates scored high in whatever tests they gave them and identified themselved as liberals, there's nothing the scientists ould have done.

Only a conservative republican would argue with science

---

Fair enough.

Temerity said:

I don't wanna know if i was breast fed,, . I have 13 but i can't answer some.

---

millzy said:

logic and reason has led many intelligent people to their respective faiths. just sayin'...

---

akira_akuma said:

millzy said:

logic and reason has led many intelligent people to their respective faiths. just sayin'...

---

yeah, that's just not true. a reason for faith is one of non-existence. there is no reason; the only rationale for  faith in "God" other then fear of the unknown, is the giving up of culpability to one's control of their own actions.

---

pwnasaurus said:

I scored 15 - I was unsure of 3 of them so I didn't count them.

---

YSHServant said:

akira_akuma said:

lets argue about it, for God's sake.

---

We are already arguing.

meams said:

YSHServant said:

This whole article is completely biased. If you are a liberal you're smarter?

You know which way this article swings.

---

no, silly person.  but thanks for proving the article's point.





it said the two are correlated.  correlation is not causation.  but thanks for showing (a) your lack of understanding of this differential and (b) your political alignment.

---

Yea, yea. Act like you know my political affiliation. I'm neither a conservative or a liberal. As a matter of fact I don't support ANY party. But when they are saying dumb shit like that, of course i'm going to say something.

---

jewunit said:

Conservatism and liberalism aren't parties. I don't know what political parties have to do with the article at all actually, so I don't know why you (or anyone else) brought them up.

---