Home | Community | Message Board

Everything Mushrooms
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop: Scales

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflineEllis Dee
Male User Gallery Arcade Champion: Duck Hunt, Enemy Enforcer

Registered: 06/30/01
Posts: 13,104
Loc: Fire in the sky
Last seen: 8 months, 20 days
Poison gas against the Kurdish in the 1920s
    #1362644 - 03/10/03 10:46 AM (15 years, 3 months ago)

[BACKGROUND: In 1917, following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, the British occupied Iraq and established a colonial government. The Arab and Kurdish people of Iraq resisted the British occupation, and by 1920 this had developed into a full scale national revolt, which cost the British dearly. As the Iraqi resistance gained strength, the British resorted to increasingly repressive measures, including the use of posion gas.]

All quotes in the excerpt are properly footnoted in the original book, with full references to British archives and papers. Excerpt from pages 179-181 of Simons, Geoff. "IRAQ: FROM SUMER TO SUDAN". London: St. Martins Press, 1994:

Winston Churchill, as colonial secretary, was sensitive to the cost of policing the Empire; and was in consequence keen to exploit the potential of modern technology. This strategy had particular relevance to operations in Iraq. On 19 February, 1920, before the start of the Arab uprising, Churchill (then Secretary for War and Air) wrote to Sir Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare. Would it be possible for Trenchard to take control of Iraq? This would entail "the provision of some kind of asphyxiating bombs calculated to cause disablement of some kind but not death...for use in preliminary operations against turbulent tribes."

Churchill was in no doubt that gas could be profitably employed against the Kurds and Iraqis (as well as against other peoples in the Empire): "I do not understand this sqeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poison gas against uncivilised tribes." Henry Wilson shared Churchills enthusiasm for gas as an instrument of colonial control but the British cabinet was reluctant to sanction the use of a weapon that had caused such misery and revulsion in the First World War. Churchill himself was keen to argue that gas, fired from ground-based guns or dropped from aircraft, would cause "only discomfort or illness, but not death" to dissident tribespeople; but his optimistic view of the effects of gas were mistaken. It was likely that the suggested gas would permanently damage eyesight and "kill children and sickly persons, more especially as the people against whom we intend to use it have no medical knowledge with which to supply antidotes."

Churchill remained unimpressed by such considerations, arguing that the use of gas, a "scientific expedient", should not be prevented "by the prejudices of those who do not think clearly". In the event, gas was used against the Iraqi rebels "with excellent moral effect" though gas shells were not dropped from aircraft because of practical difficulties [.....]

Today in 1993 there are still Iraqis and Kurds who remember being bombed and machine-gunned by the RAF in the 1920s. A Kurd from the Korak mountains commented, seventy years after the event: "They were bombing here in the Kaniya Khoran...Sometimes they raided three times a day." Wing Commander Lewis, then of 30 Squadron (RAF), Iraq, recalls how quite often "one would get a signal that a certain Kurdish village would have to be bombed...", the RAF pilots being ordered to bomb any Kurd who looked hostile. In the same vein, Squadron-Leader Kendal of 30 Squadron recalls that "if the tribespeople were doing something they ought not be doing then you shot them."

Similarly, Wing-Commander Gale, also of 30 Squadron: "If the Kurds hadn't learned by our example to behave themselves in a civilised way then we had to spank their bottoms." This was done by bombs and guns.

Wing-Commander Sir Arthur Harris (later Bomber Harris, head of wartime Bomber Command) was happy to emphasise that "The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties and damage. Within forty-five minutes a full-size village can be practically wiped out and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured." It was an easy matter to bomb and machine-gun the tribespeople, because they had no means of defence or retalitation. Iraq and Kurdistan were also useful laboratories for new weapons; devices specifically developed by the Air Ministry for use against tribal villages. The ministry drew up a list of possible weapons, some of them the forerunners of napalm and air-to-ground missiles:

Phosphorus bombs, war rockets, metal crowsfeet [to maim livestock] man-killing shrapnel, liquid fire, delay-action bombs. Many of these weapons were first used in Kurdistan.

Excerpt from pages 179-181 of Simons, Geoff. "Iraq: From Sumer to Saddam".

London: St. Martins Press, 1994.

Here's a link on the subject as well http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2719939.stm

"If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do."-King Solomon

And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator

Registered: 04/06/02
Posts: 448
Last seen: 6 years, 1 month
Re: Poison gas against the Kurdish in the 1920s [Re: Ellis Dee]
    #1373603 - 03/13/03 07:08 PM (15 years, 3 months ago)

Is there a reason no one seems to like the Kurds? Everyone just goes around killing them all the time. They are like the Isrealis with no press.

- uno

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator

Registered: 08/25/01
Posts: 889
Loc: George "I love Hitler" Bu...
Last seen: 14 years, 3 months
Re: Poison gas against the Kurdish in the 1920s [Re: Ellis Dee]
    #1373798 - 03/13/03 08:24 PM (15 years, 3 months ago)

Nice one, outa thin air.....that was a great reference.......

I was wondering about the deal the Turks wanted to have as it had to have something to do with the Kurds and it couldn't have been too friendly for them.......

Anybody know anything about that?

Support bacteria - they're the only culture some people have.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Amazon Shop: Scales

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* You mean Saddam DIDN'T gas his own people? chodamunky 1,481 19 03/24/03 10:28 AM
by OctopusDr
* The Case Against War EchoVortex 755 3 10/31/02 08:24 PM
by Anonymous
* Charges against Saddam a little old?
( 1 2 all )
Xlea321 1,457 36 07/08/04 01:43 PM
by Xlea321
* Ward Churchill: Troops should Kill Officers.
( 1 2 all )
lonestar2004 1,597 32 07/04/05 06:55 PM
by Le_Canard
* Iraq warns Turkey: Stop shelling Kurdish north. The_Red_Crayon 708 4 06/11/07 05:10 PM
by zappaisgod
* Turkey: We demand explanation for US arms in Kurdish Rebels hands. The_Red_Crayon 526 1 07/16/07 10:34 AM
by YidakiMan
* US and Turkey Agree to Eradicate Kurdish Independence Group Zahid 837 9 05/23/12 10:41 PM
by Xeonen
* Iran's new president a suspect in a series of killings of Kurdish dissidents in Western Europe Luddite 233 0 04/14/06 05:37 PM
by Luddite

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil
486 topic views. 2 members, 1 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2018 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.033 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 19 queries.