Mush 4 Brains said:

Because he's a fucking marxist.

---

bbl337 said:

i voted for him, and so far he's pissed me off.  I knew that was going to happen, but I figured he was probably the lesser of teh two evils.

---

Mush 4 Brains said:

i shouldnt even dignify that with an answer, he admits to being a fan of marxist philosophy

---

PreparationH said:

Why does he piss you off? If anything I believe we got the better deal big time.

---

bbl337 said:

i voted for him, and so far he's pissed me off.  I knew that was going to happen, but I figured he was probably the lesser of teh two evils.

---

He hasn't pissed me off, except for this bush era tax thang and some other stuff. More like a disappointment.

If I had a time machine I'd vote for Ron Paul.

PreparationH said:

Why do you say he's a marxist?

---

zappaisgod said:

First of all, Beck didn't say that 10% were terrorists, he said it was closer to 10% than to 1%.  6% would thus qualify.  That gives us what, 100M?  Now what qualifies as a terrorist?  Is it just the person who straps the bomb on?  No, of course not.  The bombmaker is also the terrorist, as is the recruiter and the financier.  Next we have the governments that sponsor terrorists.  For instance Iran.  Then we have vast numbers of people who donate money to terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah and al Qaeda.  Finally we have the terrorist's intellectual enablers and apologists.  Count Fareed Zakariah in that group.

I have no problem believing that the number of Muslims who fit into at least one of those categories is 100M  Fareed misstates what Beck says and is essentially covering for his own intellectual complicity in Muslim terror.

---

Choix Sinaloa said:

zappaisgod said:

First of all, Beck didn't say that 10% were terrorists, he said it was closer to 10% than to 1%.  6% would thus qualify.  That gives us what, 100M?  Now what qualifies as a terrorist?  Is it just the person who straps the bomb on?  No, of course not.  The bombmaker is also the terrorist, as is the recruiter and the financier.  Next we have the governments that sponsor terrorists.  For instance Iran.  Then we have vast numbers of people who donate money to terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah and al Qaeda.  Finally we have the terrorist's intellectual enablers and apologists.  Count Fareed Zakariah in that group.

I have no problem believing that the number of Muslims who fit into at least one of those categories is 100M  Fareed misstates what Beck says and is essentially covering for his own intellectual complicity in Muslim terror.

---

what?

---

The fuck do you mean what?

Are you :
Greatly lacking in reading comprehension, posting only because your IQ is barely above the retardation line?

Or: Feigning ignorance because Zappa refuted a belief of yours and admitting so would be a concession to your own child-like naivety?

Mind Transcribing said:

Choix Sinaloa said:

zappaisgod said:

First of all, Beck didn't say that 10% were terrorists, he said it was closer to 10% than to 1%.  6% would thus qualify.  That gives us what, 100M?  Now what qualifies as a terrorist?  Is it just the person who straps the bomb on?  No, of course not.  The bombmaker is also the terrorist, as is the recruiter and the financier.  Next we have the governments that sponsor terrorists.  For instance Iran.  Then we have vast numbers of people who donate money to terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah and al Qaeda.  Finally we have the terrorist's intellectual enablers and apologists.  Count Fareed Zakariah in that group.

I have no problem believing that the number of Muslims who fit into at least one of those categories is 100M  Fareed misstates what Beck says and is essentially covering for his own intellectual complicity in Muslim terror.

---

what?

---

The fuck do you mean what?

Are you :
Greatly lacking in reading comprehension, posting only because your IQ is barely above the retardation line?

Or: Feigning ignorance because Zappa refuted a belief of yours and admitting so would be a concession to your own child-like naivety?

---