Me_Roy said: What sort of issues would you hope to address through this project?
I think Owsley Stanley, at least on the surface (and probably even more so once one looks deeper), seems to be a very interesting character.
I mean, for one thing, there's his grandfather, who was a progressive senator from Kentucky, much involved in busting up tobacco trusts and battling alcohol prohibition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_Owsley_Stanley I find that interesting, as prohibition at the time was sort of a "progressive" issue (at least, it was often tied to women's suffrage), so the fact that he apparently based much of his later political career on fighting prohibition raises my eyebrows somewhat, and makes me wonder what family influences might have (perhaps even unconsciously) primed Owsley Stanley for his later career as LSD chemist. In any case, it always interests me when you have an individual from a family with considerable status go against the grain of society. I mean, an LSD chemist named Augustus Owsley Stanley III. Richard Alpert I find to be an interesting character for similar reasons, except he's already been covered quite well.
I am also intrigued by the references to Owsley Stanley in Tom Wolfe's "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test." According to that account, if I recall correctly, Owsley was somewhat of the nervous type and wasn't ready to be nearly so laid back and freewheeling with his LSD as the Merry Pranksters wanted to be. Assuming that account is representative of how Owsley actually was, I think this sort of personnage is highly remarkable, and I think it poses some questions about what the psychedelic milieu was inherently about on the West Coast. Because there's this image that, sure, Leary & co. might have been going about it like uptight East-coast intellectuals, but on the West coast everything was laid back. Well, maybe it's not so simple, especially if you have a guy who is making LSD (and not just doing quasi-respectable psychological research) whose personality is likewise not all hippy-dippy. Portraying Owsley's unique personnage could potentially help provide much-needed nuance to the image of the early psychedelic movement.
Then there's his work with doing audio for the Grateful Dead, which is a whole other interesting chapter. Then you've got his recent hobbies and his views on eating no vegetables or grains.
All very interesting stuff. And all very relevant to nuancing the image of the early psychedelic movement. Because if we can show that the early psychedelic movement attracted not just college dropout hippies and laid back "beautiful people," but also people like Owsley, coming from a background with some status (and risking this), and bringing a subtly different approach to the endeavor, then we have a way of fleshing out the early psychedelic movement into something that is less-easily stereotyped, more easily empathized with, and more thoughtfully considered.
And yes, I do realize he is still alive, but before I want to bombard him with questions, I want to think this through a little bit more and make sure that I really want to pursue this topic (and make sure that it would be feasible find the relevant primary sources, etc.) I don't want to waste his time gathering material that won't end up getting used (although I guess as long as someone gathers it, it would be helpful to any investigation in the future, regardless of who did it). But I haven't really done enough background research to be able to even ask the right questions. I'm sure whatever questions I would have for him about his personal life at this point would be somewhat ill-informed and annoying. Right now I'm only in the very preliminary brainstorming/sounding board stage, which is why I'm posting here.
Which, by the way, here's another idea: Nick Sand. (I don't know why, but all of these LSD chemists really fascinate me). I know there was like a BBC report or short documentary on him some time ago, but I think that's all that's been done on him.
Anyways, thanks for all of the responses!
|