Home | Community | Message Board

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck, Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds, Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Letter: Draconian penalties
    #12275628 -

Don Barnard

Essex Chronicle


Friday 26 Mar 2010


There is so much about cannabis politicians either do not know or do not want us to know.

Politicians in the main are ignorant about cannabis and because of this ignorance they have lost respect in all section of the community especially in the eyes of the youth.

They say we do not trust politicians; we do not like their standards. We do not think much of them.

At present the laws in respect to the illicit; supply, cultivation (production) and the possession of cannabis is concerned are both counter-productive and monstrously unfair.

There seems to be every reason to believe that the current cannabis policy, as a direct descendant of their historical precursors, are motivated more by political considerations and vested self interest, than by any public health consequences.

Bureaucratic manoeuvring, self-interests, international pressures, public health concerns and panic reaction are often base on Hype, Spin and Baloney.

The unlicensed, production (cultivation), supply and the social and medical use of cannabis are subject to monstrously disproportionate punishments.

Despite the draconian punishments for cannabis offences and the governments orchestrated disinformation campaign exaggerates the dangers of cannabis; the laws controlling illicit use of the cannabis plant and/or synthetic cannabis (THC) are not achieving the objectives envisaged by politicians who pioneered the Misuse of Drugs Bill through parliament in 1970/71

I rest my case on what I regard as indisputable propositions.

After all the debate which has been going on for over a hundred years, there is still no general consensus of "responsible opinion" as to whether cannabis is harmful, to what degree it is harmful, in what circumstances it is harmful, whether it has any short-term effects, or whether any long-term effects.

Whether we like it or not, there is a substantial body of opinion -particularly among the younger generation. Although it is not confined to them—which is not persuaded that cannabis is harmful as some would have us believe, or that the taking and using of it carries with it any moral taint or any moral guilt.

That is one of the facts of life, whether we like it or not.

There is no evidence that this activity is causing violent crime or aggressive anti-social behaviour, or is producing in otherwise normal people conditions of dependence or psychosis, requiring medical treatment.

There are few experiences where the participants themselves know so much about what they're doing, generation have being persecuted for a peaceful and, pleasurable pastime which has taught people to be more aware and bonded communities around the country into a camaraderie that few share in our impersonal world today.

Feathers ruffled -- I look forward to the opinions from the candidates and your readers on this complex subject!

Kind regards
Don Barnard
Legalise Cannabis Alliance

http://www.thisistotalessex.co.uk/

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Letter: Draconian penalties [Re: ShroomerRoss]
    #12275707 -

Politicians generally don't get involved.  They may or may not agree with the cannabis law but if they want to stay in a job then they do what they have to do.  The main objective to be ambiguous and claim to do what they believe will gain the majority of support (both public votes and private funding).  With that in mind it becomes clear why so few politicians would publicly support change for anything, let alone a subject so controversial.  There needs to be a definite majority public and private consent and at the moment as far as I'm aware its about 50/50 split for public interest.  I believe most private interest groups would be against legalisation, especially big pharma who is no doubt funding various mainstream political parties, if not all parties.

Still, glad someones voicing it.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck, Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds, Bulk Cannabis Seeds


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* War On Drugs Letter
( 1 2 all )
mushiemountain 3,823 25 04/06/06 07:24 PM
by sublime40oz
* Colorado Judge and Pot Penalties eligal 1,374 11 02/16/07 09:35 AM
by wazza
* I got a letter from the US Senate MOTH 1,161 7 02/01/05 08:36 PM
by JettaJay
* Cannabis Weed & How to Tell if it is Contaminated "Tests"
( 1 2 all )
alchino23 3,973 20 10/02/07 04:32 PM
by Cepheus
* death penalty for marijuana in america
( 1 2 all )
mungojerry 5,072 32 03/26/08 05:07 AM
by anyone420
* Judicial Watch: 10 Most Corrupt Politicians 2007
( 1 2 all )
WakeboardrB 2,835 23 01/24/08 05:54 PM
by Cancer
* CANNABIS NOW WORSE THAN THE NAZIS Visionary Tools 763 8 09/26/07 05:58 AM
by Visionary Tools
* Schedules, whats the difference, LSA and Cannabis Rainman420 645 4 02/22/08 01:30 PM
by robbyberto

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
316 topic views. 10 members, 430 guests and 140 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.021 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 14 queries.