Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #5]
    #11595788 -

Anonymous #5 said:
no STAL




If you people can't figure out that "I don't know" is the equivalent of STAL, then you're the retards who don't know how to use a poll.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #1]
    #11595811 -

"i don't know" is certainly not the same as STAL
do some research

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #2]
    #11595842 -

Yes... it is... because you click on it if you don't want to cast your vote with the two choices.  Whether you're doing it because you really don't know, or because you just want to see the poll results, it doesn't matter, because people who choose "I don't know" are irrelevant.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #2]
    #11595843 -

the bitch deserved what she got

note: if youre not fucking guilty and you know it, it's wise not to first accuse an innocent man and then change your story half way through the process

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #1]
    #11595928 -

it's an invalid poll

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #2]
    #11595949 -

I think the real question is:Would you do her?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #12]
    #11596168 -

as long as she didn't slit my throat before i came

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #8]
    #11596213 -

I'd like the thrill of it.

Knowing that you're fucking a crazy bitch who's got murder in her.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #11]
    #11596300 -

Anonymous #11 said:
the bitch deserved what she got

note: if youre not fucking guilty and you know it, it's wise not to first accuse an innocent man and then change your story half way through the process



Link?

Who knows how it really went dude.  I've read that when the police questioned her, it was pretty much bullying.  She was probably scared shitless, may have just tossed a name out of someone who had a grudge against her room mate.
Did she actually claim she saw this person killing her room mate?
I haven't read anything about what you're claiming.

All I know is the evidence the prosecution provided was shit evidence.  I don't think they met the burden of proof for guilt.  And by the way... changing your story isn't considered evidence of guilt.  You have to have real, physical evidence to prove guilt.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #8]
    #11596802 -

Anonymous #8 said:
innocent till proven guilty..

there was no proof beyond a resonable doubt that she did it.



rofl the trial is in italy not america. maybe you didn't realize this but other countries have different laws.

Edited by Anonymous (12/06/09 05:04 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #13]
    #11597269 -

Anonymous #13 said:
Anonymous #8 said:
innocent till proven guilty..

there was no proof beyond a resonable doubt that she did it.



rofl the trial is in italy not america. maybe you didn't realize this but other countries have different laws.



Italy's legal requirements for proving guilt is similar to America's.  Innocence is presumed, and the burden of proof lays on the prosecutor.
Or so I've been told, by people who have lived there.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #1]
    #11597315 -

Quote:
Anonymous #1 said: You have to have real, physical evidence to prove guilt.



what the fuck laws are you referring to? This isn't CSI. You can prove guilt without "physical evidence". it's just a bit harder than producing, say, a video tape of the person doing it + a bloody object. In some instances, they never even had a dead body.

Edited by Anonymous (12/06/09 06:19 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #13]
    #11597387 -

ideo footage from the crime scene of British student Meredith Kercher's murder flickers on a laptop screen as Bremner points out what she deems critical flaws in the collection of evidence. After placing rulers on the sides of a bloody shoeprint, for example, a blue-rubber-gloved hand reaches down with a piece of white cloth and scrubs the bloody mark off the tile floor before putting the cloth into an evidence tube. This happens three times for three separate footprints. In film footage taken at least a day later, another team of investigators attempts, using photographs, to place where the footprints had been. "They should have lifted the tile," Bremner says, shaking her head.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1904571,00.html#ixzz0YxDMcnSs


Contamination was also likely with the DNA found on Kercher's bra clasp, Bremner says, pointing out that the clasp wasn't collected until more than two months after the murder and that throughout film footage of the crime scene investigation it periodically changes location — suggesting it was picked up and moved several times.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1904571,00.html#ixzz0YxDZcdQI

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #13]
    #11597678 -

Anonymous #13 said:
You can prove guilt without "physical evidence". it's just a bit harder than producing, say, a video tape of the person doing it + a bloody object. In some instances, they never even had a dead body.



Oh really?  And how do you go about proving guilt without evidence?
To me, that doesn't sound like proof at all.
And you need either a body, or evidence that a murder took place.  If you don't have that, the "victim" could have just run off.

So why don't you post some links or something to prove your claims.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #1]
    #11597905 -

Anonymous #1 said:
Anonymous #13 said:
You can prove guilt without "physical evidence". it's just a bit harder than producing, say, a video tape of the person doing it + a bloody object. In some instances, they never even had a dead body.



Oh really?  And how do you go about proving guilt without evidence?
To me, that doesn't sound like proof at all.
And you need either a body, or evidence that a murder took place.  If you don't have that, the "victim" could have just run off.

So why don't you post some links or something to prove your claims.




hans reiser
no body, but evidence that he murdered her
but that was different, because there was pretty good actual and real good circumstantial evidence that he killed her  :\

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #1]
    #11600505 -

Anonymous #1 said:
Anonymous #5 said:
no STAL




If you people can't figure out that "I don't know" is the equivalent of STAL, then I am a goddamn taint-licking scat-muncher



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: The Amanda Knox trial [Re: Anonymous #1]
    #11600610 -

she was innocent based on the evidence(lack of, mishandling of, and contamination of).


Italy is a joke of a country.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2  [ show all ]


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* RX Med Free Trials Anonymous 195 1 02/29/08 08:44 PM
by Anonymous
* Caught with "magic mushrooms"
( 1 2 3 all )
Anonymous 2,552 40 04/05/18 12:36 AM
by Anonymous
* The Man, Every City Has One Anonymous 931 11 11/22/10 06:15 PM
by Anonymous
* Busted....possession w/ intent for shrooms
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 1,773 36 02/08/12 05:41 PM
by Anonymous
* white people
( 1 2 3 all )
Anonymous 560 55 01/05/16 10:49 PM
by george castanza
* "Jew hair"?
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 661 29 02/11/13 03:05 PM
by Anonymous
* forget it
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 681 34 11/25/09 05:43 AM
by Anonymous
* what OTC pill looks similar to hydrocodone? Anonymous 9,798 13 11/23/08 03:47 AM
by Anonymous

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: trendal, Shroomism, george castanza, Alan Rockefeller, yogabunny
567 topic views. 0 members, 26 guests and 30 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 15 queries.