Anonymous #15 said:
Anonymous #20 said: No, I'm just good at this game.  There are only so many people on this site who would defend MT and FG for their rhetoric specifically, and even fewer who would be able to correctly identify the benefits of such rhetoric during a debate--formal and informal. You're right, the person who talks more and with bigger words, unnecessary emoticons and mocking sneers will usually 'win' the debate; at least in their minds and the minds of simpletons. We had a very short conversation about a related subject just recently. Can you guess who I am?
If I were solely judging by the italicized word, which so few people do, I'd guess Veritas--but judging by a few spelling mistakes in earlier posts, I'd wouldn't say so. Explosive_Mango? My intuition tells me that I've miserably failed to pierce this veil of anonymity. 
WHO ARE ALL YOU PEOPLE!?
He's GOT to be Senor_Hongos. I can tell by the improper use of the semicolon.
|