meatcakeman said:

vintage_gonzo said:

AntiEverything said:

Man there is a LOT of ignorance in this topic

Specifically Ados and Vintage Gonzo....

Alright so anyway, I already knew that China had a bigger military than Iran....but just to be on the safe side I looked it up...

It is pretty staggering infact....

Iran has a total military attrition of: 545,000


Let's go ahead and round that up to an even million.

China still outnumbers them by 12 million soldiers
._.

Also Russia has the most technologically advanced military, even surpassing the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (suprised?)
China has very advanced weaponry, and they have the best planes in the sky. Not only that, but they know the land way better than we do, remember Vietnam and how hard it was to fight in the jungle? It is going to be similar (although we now know jungle warfare much better) except for the fact that they have 13 million strong, plus all of the civilians that will presumably be fighting alongside.

Not only that, but the typical Chinese soldier has MUCH more to fight for than the typical fat lazy american soldier.

---

Please tell me one thing that I stated that was ingnorant. Do not ignore this statement. I know you are going to troll this board and see this and since I am calling your bullshit out you better answer it.

Where in the world are you getting that Russia is the most technologically advanced army in the world and that china has the best planes in the world? Whats china's best plane? An imported Su-30 from Russia!!LOL, they arent even capable of research and development of their own. And you think they can match the US?? Why dont you look up what an f-22 is or an f-35. We are a GENERATION ahead of Russia, and god damn, AT LEAST 30 years ahead of China.

Also, whats the US budget? 500 BILLION? Ill let you look up what Russias is. I dont want to spoonfeed you too much.

And that comment about Russia is laughably ignorant. They cant even keep track of their own nukes without the CIA's help. Not only that but who tried to rescue the Kursk survivors and ended up PAYING for the clean up of the Kursk, thats right, you and me. And you think they have a better military than the US?

Where do you live Moscow? Are you a part of the NASHI? Youd have to be in order to be that clueless.

Again im calling your bullshit out.

---

please shut the fuck up about US fighter jets.
The most advanced U.S. fighter in service is inferior to the latest versions of the Sukhoi Su-30 Flanker, which are the fighter jets used by the Chinese army.

EDIT: Also, the People's Liberation Army Air Force (China's Air Force) is the world's largest air force.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/5/26/154053.shtml

---

vintage_gonzo said:

are you just going to ignore my post?

---

meatcakeman said:

vintage_gonzo said:

are you just going to ignore my post?

---

kind of

---

figured, thats what most ignorant people do when they realize how dumb they are o well, maybe I enlightened you a bit

vintage_gonzo said:

meatcakeman said:

vintage_gonzo said:

are you just going to ignore my post?

---

kind of

---

figured, thats what most ignorant people do when they realize how dumb they are o well, maybe I enlightened you a bit

---

maybe man
i sure hope you did

Amber_Glow said:

Another reason we should just hop the border to good ol' Canoodle.

---

Quote:

Where the grass is greener

Aug 22nd 2007
From Economist.com
Cities in Australia and Canada are rated the most liveable in the world

With low crime, little threat from instability or terrorism and a highly developed transport and communications infrastructure, Canada and Australia are home to the most liveable destinations in the world. Four of the ten most liveable cities surveyed by the Economist Intelligence Unit are in Australia, and two of the top five are Canadian. Vancouver is the most attractive destination, with a liveability index of just 1.3% (see table).



While liveability considers factors of recreational and cultural activity, the "big city buzz" can hamper the scores of some cities, although not to the extent that a city will present significant challenges. Global centres such as New York, Tokyo, London, Hong Kong and Paris may find themselves let down precisely because of their size and attractiveness. Traffic congestion and higher crime rates associated with large urban centres have, to some extent, offset the obvious cultural gains of living in such locations. This has also been compounded by fears that large centres like London and New York will remain targets for high-profile terror attacks. Despite this, most major centres do not present any significant challenges to liveability.

Of the 132 cities surveyed, only nine cities present the worst-case scenario in which most aspects of living quality are severely restricted, reflecting general improvements on a global scale in areas such as education, health care and infrastructure. Four of these are in Asia, mainly South Asia. The other five are in Africa (accounting for three) and the Middle East (accounting for two).

The threat of terrorism and civil unrest is a major contributing factor to the cities that suffer from the worst liveability scores, as are poor development indicators. Algiers is the least liveable destination in the survey, with a score of 64.7%.

---