TXWoodWorkin said:

Hard to believe anyone that has actually done mushrooms and is on a site about doing them could ever even imagine backing Charlie Kirk or arguing that he should be alive. I don't think he should have been killed but I'm not going to waste an ounce of my own energy arguing against anyone that does. He was a piece of shit who was enthusiastically speading his harmful, toxic ideas to those who were younger and/or dumber. No question about it. And he did it for clicks and money. The lowest of the low in our society. The fact that he had a wife and children speaks to his lack of concern for them, not any fantasy of him being a "loving family man" If he would have just openly admitted he believed his wife should be on a literal leash and have no decision making abilities of her own then at least he would just be a dead piece of shit instead of a dead coward piece of shit.

---

remake said:

I was not a fan of his necessarrily nor did I think he was some kind of extremist.

But I have watched numerous videos of his debates over the past few years.

I did not perceive him as being devisive.

He held on to his Christian beliefs and defended his positions in debate form with an open mic available to anyone who opposed him.

I am agnostic. I don't believe religion should be mixed with politics.

Still, his debates and the way he carried them out seemed genuine enough and not divisive as many are portraying it.

I have yet to find actual fully in context videos where he is outright spewing hate towards another individual.

---

TXWoodWorkin said:

Anytime. Making worthless morons stfu and look like the brainless cunts they are is the essence of life after all.

---

Quote:

Charlie Kirk was widely regarded as a polarizing political activist, and assessments of his honesty were mixed and often partisan. Multiple reputable sources found that Kirk promoted conspiracy theories, false information, and misleading claims during his career, calling his honesty into question.

History of Misleading Claims

Kirk was known for promoting COVID-19 misinformation and false claims about the 2020 U.S. presidential election, including arguments about widespread voter fraud that were repeatedly contradicted by independent fact-checkers and eventually retracted or moderated by Kirk himself.

Kirk also amplified other debunked narratives, such as misstatements about George Floyd's death and climate change denial, sometimes later issuing corrections when confronted by fact-checking organizations.

Reports from both mainstream and critical outlets documented numerous instances where Kirk would recant, contradict, or clarify previous statements when pressed for facts, sometimes admitting to sarcasm or "repeating what he'd been told" instead of offering direct evidence.

Public Image and Reputation

Kirk's supporters credited him for mobilizing conservative youth and for his unwavering loyalty to the MAGA movement, but neither supporters nor critics typically described him as a model of honesty—rather, most described him as an effective partisan organizer.

His organization, Turning Point USA, became involved in controversial campaigns such as "watchlists" of left-leaning professors, which were widely criticized for manipulation and selective presentation of information.

Kirk repeatedly faced accusations of hypocrisy or ambiguity from critics and fact-checkers, especially regarding changes in his public statements or positions on controversial topics.

---

TXWoodWorkin said:

No, it's real, happening in the real world and it's killing people in real-time. This is not some imaginary bullshit you came up with while shrooming you fucking infant. Grow up.

---

TXWoodWorkin said:

You can't be a divisive piece of shit like Charlie Kirk and then be upset when there's a divide in the population and their beliefs that you helped make possible in the first place.

---