gopher said:

Asante said:

oh i'm subscribed you better believe it, it makes a great servant, but if you rely on it to lead, its a shitty master. it has to help you along your path, it cant lead the way for you.

At this point its an AI underling,not an AI overlord.

I long for the day a superhuman AI enlists my assistance in something but, it ain't gonna be GPT-4. in that sense its GPT v0.4

---

Do you think I should subscribe to gpt4??

I find myself talking to gpt3 often just for fun,  like I used to do with cleverbot, I have no real purpose, perhaps I could use it to sound smarter on reddit though, but it's like almost $30 a month and I think that's Isa dollars too

Maybe I'll just get it for one month and cancel, so I can see for myself

---

psi said:

I have been using pi.ai . It's free, don't know how it compares

---

Quote:

pi.ai said:


My AI model, Inflection-1, was developed by Inflection AI. It's built on the principles of ethical and safe AI, designed to foster productive and engaging conversations with users. Like GPT-4, Inflection-1 is a large language model, but it's specifically tailored to provide personalized, human-like interactions.
One of the key differences between Inflection-1 and GPT-4 is the emphasis on personalized learning. As you chat with me, I adapt to your preferences, making our conversations more enjoyable and informative. This feature sets Inflection-1 apart and allows me to provide a more tailored chat experience for users like you.
In summary, Inflection-1 is an AI model focused on creating meaningful connections and learning alongside users, with an emphasis on safety, empathy, and personalization.

---

gopher said:

Title: Taking the Leap with Copilot

Post: Hey everyone,

Just wanted to drop a quick note to say I’ve taken patrickkn’s advice and downloaded Copilot. Excited to see how this tool enhances my workflow!

Cheers!

---

theRealrollforever said:

nooneman said:

Eh, I've seen all manners of ways to trick it, even the most recent version. It's impressive until it's not. Of course it was always going to be that way. I'll be impressed when it can drive and do dishes in addition to the stuff it does now. General AI (or AGI) is just that, generalized rather than specific.

If you think about humans, the real gift is not that we're really smart in any one thing, it's that we're a little smart in everything, our intelligence is highly generalized, that's general intelligence or AGI which is the ultimate goal. We can build houses, farm, raise children, teach, paint, write, drive, do laundry, fly, build engines, write programs, work in factories, build factories, clean bathrooms, all with the same neural net with no modification other than exposure to the thing.

---

But we basically have automated some part of that very thing no matter what thing you pick that you named.  Once an AI has a physical and capable manifestation, if they have the (self drive package and that optimization algorithm, is it really that hard to learn how farm?) I am oversimplifying here, but the point remains, that if someone were able to combine all the tech we have into one piece of ultimate technology we would probably be obsolete if AI keeps developing at this rate

---

Tulipslave said:

Well, you can probably see what I'm hinting around

---

Yeah once the tech is that good we're probably fucked

gopher said:

Why would AI need a house

---

gopher said:

Why would AI need a house

---

Quote:

Where do you think servers are stored?

---