durian_2008 said:

koods said:

And is the modeling accurate? Where is the study that tests the model?

---

That's what we said.

---

koods said:

durian_2008 said:

koods said:

And is the modeling accurate? Where is the study that tests the model?

---

That's what we said.

---

You’re the one who posted the article

---

I'm not a grammar nazi, just don't understand what you are trying to communicate, at this point.

koods said:

You posted an article that made claims based on untested models. We said the models are untested. You said “that’s what we said.”

You don’t make any sense

---

koods said:

You posted an article that made claims based on untested models. We said the models are untested. You said “that’s what we said.”

You don’t make any sense

---

koods said:

Oh

---

Quote:

“If everybody in the world got the common cold at the same time, it would be a big deal,” Hanage said. “That’s the thing about a pandemic of this nature. It’s not so much the individual fatality rate; it’s the fact that a respiratory virus is capable of infecting lots of people very quickly. And that means — as with Omicron — flight crews all go down at the same time because they tend to hang out with each other. Same thing with health care workers on a particular ward. Same thing with teachers.”

---

336 said:

I don't know man, at a certain point, with wars, famine, floods, starvation, poverty, wealth inequality, corruption, violence, crime, depression, suicide, etc etc, worrying about the common cold seems like a fucking joke to a lot of us. But I get where you are coming from. I guess.

---

336 said:

the common cold / flu has been known to do that.

---