koods said:

There’s a dude who lives on my block who rides a Segway up and down the street and I saw him inside the grocery store riding it around so I finally asked him what was up with it. He said he has chronic Lyme and it’s hard for him to get around. I’m skeptical. Chronic Lyme is the new fibromyalgia. I’ve had Lyme practically every other year for a decade and I don’t need a fucking Segway. I just finished a course of doxycycline a month ago and my intestines are finally getting back to normal.

---

Quote:

A BLAST search for the 12-nucleotide insertion led us to a 100% reverse match in a proprietary sequence (SEQ ID11652, nt 2751-2733) found in the US patent 9,587,003 filed on Feb. 4, 2016 (9) (Figure 1). Examination of SEQ ID11652 revealed that the match extends beyond the 12-nucleotide insertion to a 19-nucleotide sequence: 5′-CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG-3′ (nt 2733-2751 of SEQ ID11652), such that the resulting mRNA would have 3′- GAUGCACGGGCGGCUCCUC-5′, or equivalently 5′- CU CCU CGG CGG GCA CGU AG-3′ (nucleotides 23547-23565 in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, in which the four bold codons yield PRRA, amino acids 681–684 of its spike protein).



This is very rare in the NCBI BLAST database. The correlation between this SARS-CoV-2 sequence and the reverse complement of a proprietary mRNA sequence is of uncertain origin. Conventional biostatistical analysis indicates that the probability of this sequence randomly being present in a 30,000-nucleotide viral genome is 3.21 ×10−11

---

Gorlax said:

Would love to see the clowns on here that would like to explain all the new reports coming out confirming this came from a lab.

They found genetic code that is identical to the Moderna Cell Line Cultures
Code for Code identical to their filed patent in 2016 -  1 out of 3 trillion probability could ever happen naturally.

Quote:

A BLAST search for the 12-nucleotide insertion led us to a 100% reverse match in a proprietary sequence (SEQ ID11652, nt 2751-2733) found in the US patent 9,587,003 filed on Feb. 4, 2016 (9) (Figure 1). Examination of SEQ ID11652 revealed that the match extends beyond the 12-nucleotide insertion to a 19-nucleotide sequence: 5′-CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG-3′ (nt 2733-2751 of SEQ ID11652), such that the resulting mRNA would have 3′- GAUGCACGGGCGGCUCCUC-5′, or equivalently 5′- CU CCU CGG CGG GCA CGU AG-3′ (nucleotides 23547-23565 in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, in which the four bold codons yield PRRA, amino acids 681–684 of its spike protein).



This is very rare in the NCBI BLAST database. The correlation between this SARS-CoV-2 sequence and the reverse complement of a proprietary mRNA sequence is of uncertain origin. Conventional biostatistical analysis indicates that the probability of this sequence randomly being present in a 30,000-nucleotide viral genome is 3.21 ×10−11

---

The probability of that sequence being in sars-cov-2 due to random chance is estimated to be around one in 100,000,000,000. The most likely explanation would be that it end up in sars-cov-2 by being cultured in Moderna-owned MSH3 cell cultures at some point.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full

Then explain this that just came out. Project Defuse

DARPA project to reverse engineer bat corona viruses after making them infect human cells - 1 year prior to the outbreak. It is all unraveling!

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal

I've stood by the lab leak since 2020

---

you know.. in the 200 day ahead warning of monkeypox thread, in another context, part of the "anime version" of the prediction was that the "smallpox" would be found to be made in a biolab and its origin mand thus culprits would be known, so, i'm holding off judgement in this one. It would be way too garbled for Koods to take an element of one pandemic and apply it to the other, but not for me. Speculationg puzzling how the pieces fit.





who knows man, plausible deniability is a powerful thing.

Gorlax said:

Would love to see the clowns on here that would like to explain all the new reports coming out confirming this came from a lab.

They found genetic code that is identical to the Moderna Cell Line Cultures
Code for Code identical to their filed patent in 2016 -  1 out of 3 trillion probability could ever happen naturally.

Quote:

A BLAST search for the 12-nucleotide insertion led us to a 100% reverse match in a proprietary sequence (SEQ ID11652, nt 2751-2733) found in the US patent 9,587,003 filed on Feb. 4, 2016 (9) (Figure 1). Examination of SEQ ID11652 revealed that the match extends beyond the 12-nucleotide insertion to a 19-nucleotide sequence: 5′-CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG-3′ (nt 2733-2751 of SEQ ID11652), such that the resulting mRNA would have 3′- GAUGCACGGGCGGCUCCUC-5′, or equivalently 5′- CU CCU CGG CGG GCA CGU AG-3′ (nucleotides 23547-23565 in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, in which the four bold codons yield PRRA, amino acids 681–684 of its spike protein).



This is very rare in the NCBI BLAST database. The correlation between this SARS-CoV-2 sequence and the reverse complement of a proprietary mRNA sequence is of uncertain origin. Conventional biostatistical analysis indicates that the probability of this sequence randomly being present in a 30,000-nucleotide viral genome is 3.21 ×10−11

---

The probability of that sequence being in sars-cov-2 due to random chance is estimated to be around one in 100,000,000,000. The most likely explanation would be that it end up in sars-cov-2 by being cultured in Moderna-owned MSH3 cell cultures at some point.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full

Then explain this that just came out. Project Defuse

DARPA project to reverse engineer bat corona viruses after making them infect human cells - 1 year prior to the outbreak. It is all unraveling!

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal

I've stood by the lab leak since 2020

---

Gorlax said:

Would love to see the clowns on here that would like to explain all the new reports coming out confirming this came from a lab.

They found genetic code that is identical to the Moderna Cell Line Cultures
Code for Code identical to their filed patent in 2016 -  1 out of 3 trillion probability could ever happen naturally.

Quote:

A BLAST search for the 12-nucleotide insertion led us to a 100% reverse match in a proprietary sequence (SEQ ID11652, nt 2751-2733) found in the US patent 9,587,003 filed on Feb. 4, 2016 (9) (Figure 1). Examination of SEQ ID11652 revealed that the match extends beyond the 12-nucleotide insertion to a 19-nucleotide sequence: 5′-CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG-3′ (nt 2733-2751 of SEQ ID11652), such that the resulting mRNA would have 3′- GAUGCACGGGCGGCUCCUC-5′, or equivalently 5′- CU CCU CGG CGG GCA CGU AG-3′ (nucleotides 23547-23565 in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, in which the four bold codons yield PRRA, amino acids 681–684 of its spike protein)


This is very rare in the NCBI BLAST database. The correlation between this SARS-CoV-2 sequence and the reverse complement of a proprietary mRNA sequence is of uncertain origin. Conventional biostatistical analysis indicates that the probability of this sequence randomly being present in a 30,000-nucleotide viral genome is 3.21 ×10−11

---

The probability of that sequence being in sars-cov-2 due to random chance is estimated to be around one in 100,000,000,000. The most likely explanation would be that it end up in sars-cov-2 by being cultured in Moderna-owned MSH3 cell cultures at some point.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full

Then explain this that just came out. Project Defuse

DARPA project to reverse engineer bat corona viruses after making them infect human cells - 1 year prior to the outbreak. It is all unraveling!

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal

I've stood by the lab leak since 2020

---

Quote:

The genetic code doesn’t arise through random chance.

---

Quote:

In the other way, the chance of the otherwise extremely distant ZC45/ZXC21 and RaTG13 to have only 2 different nucleotides on the E gene that encodes the same exact amino acid sequence, should both strains of the viruses being the result of natural evolution, is less than 1 in 19241. From prior calculation, we concluded that, due to the abnormally similar E protein genes and identical E proteins between the both geographically and phylogenetically very distant ZC45/ZXC21 and RaTG13 being nearly impossible of being the result of natural evolution, one of the viruses must be unnatural. Since RaTG13 was submitted at 27 January 2020, AFTER the outbreak, without being independently sequenced by any institutions or scientists other than the Wuhan Institute of Virology(WIV) where the sequence was first submitted, the Validity of RaTG13 can not be confirmed by independent research and should therefore be excluded from all
credible researches on the origins of SARS-CoV-2.

---

koods said:

Cool story

---