Quote:

you implied that the length of a book can be criticised as a fault, but it literally cannot, there has to a rationale for that criticism, and length isn't that. length is ambiguous. it has no quality in and of itself that can be criticised, because nothing is there to criticise. it's a length.

like i said...you can dislike the trope, and you can dislike long books, for what of your personal reasons, like maybe you just don't like it...maybe you feel things should be kept shorter, for your personal preference of enjoyment. but that's just preference and not real criticism. it can't be, there's nothing there to criticise, save your preferences, which hasn't to do with the book itself, but with you, yourself.

---

Quote:

you implicatively insinuated that the length of a book can be criticised as a fault, but it literally cannot, there has to a rationale for that reproval, and length isn't that. length is equivocal. it has no quality in and of itself that can be criticised, because nothing is there to criticise. it's a length.

like i verbally expressed...you can disrelish the trope, and you can misprize long books, for what of your personal reasons, like maybe you just don't relish it...maybe you feel things should be kept shorter, for your personal predilection of delectation. but that's just predilection and illusory reproval. it can't be, there's nothing there to criticise, preserve your predilections, which hasn't to do with the book itself, but with you, yourself.

---

Quote:

i am not the only one arguing here. the argument did not start with me. it's ended with me.

and there are pages upon pages of people having convo's in this thread, without them posting pictures...for pages on end. i wasn't even here when this "argument" started, so, don't just make it about me.

PS: i posted my pic, too, so neener neener, i'm actually "participating" more in the thread than you are.

---

Quote:

i literally for the most part am not the only one arguing here, which genuinely definitely is fairly paramount, or so they mostly thought. the argument did not fundamentally literally start with me, which definitely for the most part is fairly consequential, so i literally am not the only one arguing here, which genuinely authentically is fairly paramount, which generally is quite consequential. it's concretely for the most part ended with me, which categorically definitely is fairly consequential, which categorically is fairly consequential. and there kind of categorically are pages upon pages of people having convo's in this thread, without them posting pictures...for pages on end in a subtle way in a subtle way. i wasn't even here when this "argument" commenced, so, don't just fundamentally literally make it about me, so it's genuinely categorically ended with me, which concretely literally is quite paramount, demonstrating how the argument did not rudimentally kind of start with me, which definitely fundamentally is fairly consequential, so i literally mostly am not the only one arguing here, which authentically literally is fairly consequential, or so they essentially thought. PS: i for the most part literally posted my pic, additionally, so neener neener, i'm genuinely "participating" kind of definitely more in the thread than you are, which generally for all intents and purposes shows that the argument did not scarcely definitely start with me, which kind of shows that the argument did not fundamentally literally start with me, which definitely kind of is fairly consequential, so i literally for all intents and purposes am not the only one arguing here, which authentically for all intents and purposes is fairly consequential, which literally is quite paramount. 2 PS: i mostly posted my pic, additionally, so neener neener, i'm authentically "participating" much more in the thread than you are, very further exhibiting how pS: i for the most part kind of posted my pic, additionally, so neener neener, i'm genuinely "participating" kind of assuredly more in the thread than you are, which generally mostly shows that the argument did not scarcely concretely start with me, which generally shows that the argument did not fundamentally essentially start with me, which definitely generally is fairly consequential, so i literally for the most part am not the only one arguing here, which genuinely genuinely is fairly consequential in a definitely major way.

---

akira_akuma said:

i'm fine with this brainchild. but can it do rapid dominance like i so indubitably can?

even more superlative a manifestation, i dare say, would be the "real thing", if i do say so myself.

---

Quote:

Genius said:
war is the bedrock assumption of humanities cure for ailment. humanity has struck great blows on itself by trying to achieve divine right, but out of the wounds came the burden of our civiliations.

---

Bodhi of Ankou said:

Name it akira quixote, and pray they dont get into an argument with one another.

---