The Ecstatic said:

Bubbles85 said:

The Ecstatic said:

Would you have opposed the mass immigration of Irish to this country?

Why or why not

---

People have every right to oppose any immigration that promotes racial segregation. Mass immigration is the biggest cause of this.

Racial segregation is a huge issue with the Muslim population in Britain, who fight to conserve their religious ideologies, by way of living completely separate lives from the rest of the country.

Many are simply refusing to integrate and mass immigration has allowed that to happen.

This is well documented. With many polls, such as from ICM confirming that fact.

---

Why do they have to integrate?

---

Bigbadwooof said:

The Ecstatic said:

Bubbles85 said:

The Ecstatic said:

Would you have opposed the mass immigration of Irish to this country?

Why or why not

---

People have every right to oppose any immigration that promotes racial segregation. Mass immigration is the biggest cause of this.

Racial segregation is a huge issue with the Muslim population in Britain, who fight to conserve their religious ideologies, by way of living completely separate lives from the rest of the country.

Many are simply refusing to integrate and mass immigration has allowed that to happen.

This is well documented. With many polls, such as from ICM confirming that fact.

---

Why do they have to integrate?

---

Because when they don't they bomb Paris.

---

Bubbles85 said:

The 50% figure is not a lie, it is a fact. I was speaking about specific areas, not London as a whole. The Office for National Statistics has confirmed that certain areas of London are now 50% Muslim.

Yes, i agree, he probably is a good representative of the native population. He is one of the few Muslims prepared to speak out against the majority, who are refusing to integrate and who push their social conservatism.

---

Bubbles85 said:

Tipote said:

Sorry.. but if youre going to keep using that 50% figure, can you back it up please?

Yes, London is about 45% white british https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_London#2011_Census

but it is about 12% islamic, not 50%. That is your perception, not reality.

---

No, not my perception, it is reality.

You're talking about the entire population of the London area, which indeed, Muslims make up 12% of. I stated that Muslims now make up 50% of the population in certain areas, which is the truth and has been stated so, by the Office for National Statistics.

Look it up if you don't believe me.

---

Bigbadwooof said:

The Ecstatic said:

Bubbles85 said:

The Ecstatic said:

Would you have opposed the mass immigration of Irish to this country?

Why or why not

---

People have every right to oppose any immigration that promotes racial segregation. Mass immigration is the biggest cause of this.

Racial segregation is a huge issue with the Muslim population in Britain, who fight to conserve their religious ideologies, by way of living completely separate lives from the rest of the country.

Many are simply refusing to integrate and mass immigration has allowed that to happen.

This is well documented. With many polls, such as from ICM confirming that fact.

---

Why do they have to integrate?

---

Because when they don't they bomb Paris.

---

Malkuthian said:

Bubbles85 said:

The 50% figure is not a lie, it is a fact. I was speaking about specific areas, not London as a whole. The Office for National Statistics has confirmed that certain areas of London are now 50% Muslim.

Yes, i agree, he probably is a good representative of the native population. He is one of the few Muslims prepared to speak out against the majority, who are refusing to integrate and who push their social conservatism.

---

And at the same time you spoke about the natives being a minority. You make it hard to understand what the point behind your words is.

Exactly. He is a Muslim leader in a western country, and good will come from it.

---

Its interesting that when a British Muslim doesn't conform to some perceived negative view of what a Muslim is, it isnt embraced. This is something that contributes to the separation and the lack of integration amongst some.

Sadiq Khan has had the largest number of people voting for him compared to other elections. This is a victory not only of integration but of the left as it is his policies that made him worth voting for. The conservative candidate was smearing him throughout the run up to the elections hinting that him being a muslim was negative and connects him with extremists. Even the PM said things along these lines...

but clearly Londoners do not agree.



If things were the other way around and Zac Goldsmith, the conservative (Jewish and son of a billionaire) candidate was slandered in any kind of way regarding his religion, then critics will be blasted for antisemitism. The double standards are all too clear to see yet some people still refuse to see it.

LOL did anyone see how terribly Britain First did?

Malkuthian said:

Bubbles85 said:

The 50% figure is not a lie, it is a fact. I was speaking about specific areas, not London as a whole. The Office for National Statistics has confirmed that certain areas of London are now 50% Muslim.

Yes, i agree, he probably is a good representative of the native population. He is one of the few Muslims prepared to speak out against the majority, who are refusing to integrate and who push their social conservatism.

---

And at the same time you spoke about the natives being a minority.

---

Tipote said:

Bubbles85 said:

Tipote said:

Sorry.. but if youre going to keep using that 50% figure, can you back it up please?

Yes, London is about 45% white british https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_London#2011_Census

but it is about 12% islamic, not 50%. That is your perception, not reality.

---

No, not my perception, it is reality.

You're talking about the entire population of the London area, which indeed, Muslims make up 12% of. I stated that Muslims now make up 50% of the population in certain areas, which is the truth and has been stated so, by the Office for National Statistics.

Look it up if you don't believe me.

---

Its not that I don't believe it, its just that its not really making that much sense. Whats it got to do with swaying/influencing the election if Muslims are concentrated sometimes in certain places?

---

Bubbles85 said:

Malkuthian said:

Bubbles85 said:

The 50% figure is not a lie, it is a fact. I was speaking about specific areas, not London as a whole. The Office for National Statistics has confirmed that certain areas of London are now 50% Muslim.

Yes, i agree, he probably is a good representative of the native population. He is one of the few Muslims prepared to speak out against the majority, who are refusing to integrate and who push their social conservatism.

---

And at the same time you spoke about the natives being a minority.

---

Yes, because it is a well known fact that the left manipulate the voter base with mass immigration.

Bring in hordes of migrants who depend on the government (the left) to maintain a higher vote percentage and remain in power.

If you think that the native populace being in a minority in the London area to migrants, has had no impact on the out come of a Left wing Muslim politician gaining power, then you're sadly mistaken.

Even those who are not Muslim, but are migrants are more likely to vote for the left. That is a fact.

---

Malkuthian said:

Bubbles85 said:

Malkuthian said:

Bubbles85 said:

The 50% figure is not a lie, it is a fact. I was speaking about specific areas, not London as a whole. The Office for National Statistics has confirmed that certain areas of London are now 50% Muslim.

Yes, i agree, he probably is a good representative of the native population. He is one of the few Muslims prepared to speak out against the majority, who are refusing to integrate and who push their social conservatism.

---

And at the same time you spoke about the natives being a minority.

---

Yes, because it is a well known fact that the left manipulate the voter base with mass immigration.

Bring in hordes of migrants who depend on the government (the left) to maintain a higher vote percentage and remain in power.

If you think that the native populace being in a minority in the London area to migrants, has had no impact on the out come of a Left wing Muslim politician gaining power, then you're sadly mistaken.

Even those who are not Muslim, but are migrants are more likely to vote for the left. That is a fact.

---

So the "problem" you are addressing is the rise of the horrible left-wing?
Thanks for clarifying.

---

The Ecstatic said:

God damn those lefties for having compassion.


Not only that, but allowing refugees to RECOGNIZE it?! Disgusting.

---

Bubbles85 said:

The Ecstatic said:

God damn those lefties for having compassion.


Not only that, but allowing refugees to RECOGNIZE it?! Disgusting.

---

Using corrupt tactic's to manipulate the vote, has nothing to do with compassion.

Also, the refugee population in the UK from the current crisis is like a few thousand people. So your point is irrelevant.

---

The Ecstatic said:

zappaisgod said:

viktor said:

So, who thinks World War III (Judeo-Christianity vs. Islam) is going to be the result of this?

---

If it actually comes to a war of resolution like the first two were it will be very short.  The muslims are impressively incompetent.

---

People are idiots if they think some homogenous Muslim "axis" is an existential threat to the West.

The Muslim world cant even agree with itself, cant shed their antiquated social policies, cant do a bunch of things it would take to topple the West.

The West exploits the Middle East as we exploit Africa and SE Asia, we just dont worry about the blowback because neither Liberia nor Taiwan have nukes, or a legitimate international terror network.

---

Tipote said:

qman said:

Tipote said:

Bigbadwooof said:

Here's a story of a Turkish immigrant you should read, Qman.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/27/business/a-windfall-for-chobani-employees-stakes-in-the-company.html?_r=0

Zappa would do well to read it also, given his recent silly comment on the value of employees.

---

nice one, i was going to post this. Great story.

also..this just in.. London just elected its first Muslim mayor.

---

Most Muslim's must hate him.

---

what do you know?

So bubbles said that Khan won in part from so many muslims living in london but youre saying the muslims hate him?

---