Home | Community | Message Board
You are not signed in.
Sign In New Account
Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery

Kratom Eye
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.

Community > The Pub
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 |  [ show all ]
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #22485367 -

how many homeless/jobless people have phones?:lol:  if i was broke, phone would be first thing to go


--------------------
We were sent to hell for eternity :hellfire: Ø:omgawesome:h®
We play on earth to pass the time :foreheadslap:

Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: makaveli8x8]
    #22485384 -

makaveli8x8 said:
how many homeless/jobless people have phones?:lol:  if i was broke, phone would be first thing to go


I would keep the phone for potential calls from employers that I want to work for.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: ecstaticengine10]
    #22485392 -

No. It is everyone 16 and older.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: ecstaticengine10]
    #22485421 -

We just got to the job totals of 2007 about 6 months ago, it took 7 years to get back to that level and that doesn't take into account population growth. Also, most of the new jobs are part time low paying service jobs.  Why would anyone be bragging about employment in the US unless there's a political agenda?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: ecstaticengine10]
    #22485444 -

id just use a friends number then call them back or have my friend pretend to be me, or just not even put a number, just walk in and talk to them in person a couple days after u turned it in.  for me personally a phone is just the most useless waste of money that provides zero entertainment value, thats only worth is for roadside emergency's.  if you lose a job and arn't sure when you'll get another that $60+ a month adds up.  i get what your saying tho alot of people are addicted to their phones and would keep it tho.  But on the other hand people who are chronically out of work most likely can't even afford it if they wanted one


--------------------
We were sent to hell for eternity :hellfire: Ø:omgawesome:h®
We play on earth to pass the time :foreheadslap:

Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: makaveli8x8] * 1
    #22485635 -

This:



Is cleaner, safer, more efficient, less polluting than this:



--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Patlal] * 1
    #22485705 -

they spend alot of gas mining those tar sands tho, i can't remember the ratio but it didn't seem very logical.  from a buisness perspective it might be profitable, but from a resource perspective we are just throwing oil away doing it.  trains are actually really efficient for the amount of stuff they haul around, problem is we buy oil, then export oil because we just like to do things twice for no real reason.


--------------------
We were sent to hell for eternity :hellfire: Ø:omgawesome:h®
We play on earth to pass the time :foreheadslap:

Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
    #22485725 -

what an idiot

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: CHeifM4sterDiezL]
    #22485737 -

how so?


--------------------
We were sent to hell for eternity :hellfire: Ø:omgawesome:h®
We play on earth to pass the time :foreheadslap:

Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
    #22485743 -

I would normally be a bit more butthurt about this, but given today's jobs report... oh well :shrug:


--------------------
:leaf: :usa:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Webster10] * 1
    #22485808 -

fuck those nasty tar sands.  let the canadians pump that shit across their own country.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: ballsalsa] * 1
    #22485820 -

are there any actual legitimte reasons why this thing got blocked besides "fuck canada"

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: CHeifM4sterDiezL] * 1
    #22485847 -

yeah, because there is almost nothing to gain from that pipeline except increased chances of pipeline spills.  let them spill the shit on their own pristine wilderness.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Patlal]
    #22486027 -

Patlal said:
This:



Is cleaner, safer, more efficient, less polluting than this:





Wait wait, I havent read any actual reports on anything, but wouldn't rail carts be much less polluting than the a pipe line in the event of major spills? Cause rail carts are each individually contained, making it hard for a major spill. Maybe they spill more micro bits in the loading process? I've never done or read up about it. Also, the complicatedness of it all haha :tongue2: gives more oil company jobs, helpin' out the little guy. 

We really gotta figure out how to refine it ALL in Canada. That'd be nice. More more step in the country is one more step!

:sunny:Shorty:sunny:


--------------------
Did I say it too loud? Big heart? Or a little misleading!:musicnote:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Shortknight] * 1
    #22486130 -

This happeed a year and a half ago in Quebec



The train derailed, something like 20 tanker blew up, it took half of downtown in flame and killed everybody in the area.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Patlal]
    #22486137 -

See it happen:



--------------------

Edited by Patlal (11/06/15 01:27 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: CHeifM4sterDiezL] * 1
    #22486144 -

CHeifM4sterDiezL said:
are there any actual legitimte reasons why this thing got blocked besides "fuck canada"


Not really, if harper wasn't such a dipshit this wouldn't matter seeing as were just gonna continue shipping it to China. He dumped a ton of money into the project already however so we lost a tidy sum of money in the process. Fucking conservatives.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
    #22486204 -

Without the pipeline, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates have job security with their involvement with the railroads used to ship all the oil. The unemployment rate is more along the lines of 42%. Worker population of 204 million with 94 million out of the workforce. That's 46% and a far cry from the claims of 5%.

This article claims unemployment is 60%. Should be an interesting read when I get to it.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/08/21/donald-trump-is-wrong-the-true-unemployment-rate-is-not-42-its-60/


--------------------
"I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out"               
                -Bill Hicks-

__

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Astral Pain]
    #22486228 -

Ah, isn't it always about protecting big money at this point?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Patlal]
    #22486331 -

Patlal said:
This happeed a year and a half ago in Quebec



The train derailed, something like 20 tanker blew up, it took half of downtown in flame and killed everybody in the area.


Sucks. Maybe you guys should build your own pipelne to Lake Superior and build your own disgusting refineries that blow up and kill people.


--------------------
NotSheekle said
“if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”

Edited by koods (11/06/15 02:13 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 |  [ show all ]

Community > The Pub
Threaded Mode Threaded  Previous topic Previous  View all topics Index  Next topic Next 

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Obama and the shroomery
( 1 2 all )		 Almond Flour 2,399 27 04/01/09 11:54 AM
by gotfungus
* There will be riots If Obama loses/wins election
( 1 2 all )		 Brainiac 5,724 24 11/03/08 05:30 PM
by seven rays
* Obama cant be president ??
( 1 2 3 4 all )		 weiliiiiiii 9,087 63 10/25/08 11:53 PM
by WakeboardrB
* Keystone Ice and Chronic Gastronomicus 1,094 19 05/28/08 03:03 AM
by Gastronomicus
* Northslope crude spills from Alaska pipeline
( 1 2 all )		 DeadHearts 1,403 25 05/25/10 08:14 PM
by Mad_Larkin
* .
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )		 AnonymousRabbit 4,436 83 03/23/09 08:16 PM
by memes
* Preacher at McCain Rally warns God not to let Obama win.
( 1 2 3 all )		 Baby_Hitler 3,092 44 10/16/08 09:44 PM
by Baby_Hitler
* Will I get unemployment?
( 1 2 all )		 LayYouIn 3,986 35 08/29/07 06:40 PM
by LayYouIn

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
2,252 topic views. 4 members, 9 guests and 103 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.037 seconds spending 0.009 seconds on 18 queries.