|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline 2
#22485018 - 11/06/15 09:11 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Fuck you Canada. Keep your dirty oil.
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-keystone-xl-pipeline-2015-11
Quote:
President Barack Obama suddenly scheduled a press conference for 11:45 a.m. ET Friday.
Though the White House did not reveal what Obama will announce, The Wall Street Journal's Amy Harder reported that the administration will reveal its position on the Keystone XL pipeline.
The State Department, which for years has been reviewing the controversial pipeline project, didn't immediately respond to requests for comment from Business Insider.
The White House declined to comment.
If true, the administration's rejection of the Keystone pipeline would not come as a surprise, as Obama vetoed a Republican-backed bill to fastrack the project in February.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485026 - 11/06/15 09:13 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: The White House declined to comment.
dont they always?
Quote:
If true, the administration's rejection of the Keystone pipeline would not come as a surprise, as Obama vetoed a Republican-backed bill to fastrack the project in February.
so obama is always blocking the jobs bills
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22485059 - 11/06/15 09:18 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Why do we need a jobs bill? Unemployment rates are lower than thy have been in 7 years and Obama has added more jobs than both George Bushes combined
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Sun King



Registered: 02/15/14
Posts: 4,069
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485065 - 11/06/15 09:19 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Yay, trains!
--------------------
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Sun King] 1
#22485075 - 11/06/15 09:22 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Canada should build its own ducking pipeline and its own refineries
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22485083 - 11/06/15 09:24 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
koods said: The White House declined to comment.
dont they always?
Quote:
If true, the administration's rejection of the Keystone pipeline would not come as a surprise, as Obama vetoed a Republican-backed bill to fastrack the project in February.
so obama is always blocking the jobs bills
The comment is coming at 11:45
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485090 - 11/06/15 09:25 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Why do we need a jobs bill? Unemployment rates are lower than thy have been in 7 years and Obama has added more jobs than both George Bushes combined
no, the claim is that the unemployment rate is lower, when people arent collecting unemployment they are no longer counted as unemployed
it's also interesting to note, that since he has once more rejected this pipeline, it shows he's all for putting more of those greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere, instead of using a little electricity to pump the oil to refineries it will have to travel via the heavy use of fossil fuels, trucks, trains and boats. now there's also a greater risk of ecological damage since these methods of transport arent as secure as a pipeline
so is this a situation where obama is again a hypocryte and trying to destroy the world or is this obama throwing a tantrum because REPUBLICANS
|
Sun King



Registered: 02/15/14
Posts: 4,069
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485093 - 11/06/15 09:26 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Canada should build its own ducking pipeline and its own refineries
They don't know how.
--------------------
|
Zombi3
Bella Ciao!!




Registered: 01/11/13
Posts: 27,086
Loc: Bat Country
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485098 - 11/06/15 09:26 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
My fancy pants iPhone just told me this
-------------------- You’ve Met With A Terrible Fate, Haven’t You?
Click here to enter this weeks Ban Lottery!! In Crust We Trust
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22485134 - 11/06/15 09:34 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
koods said: Why do we need a jobs bill? Unemployment rates are lower than thy have been in 7 years and Obama has added more jobs than both George Bushes combined
no, the claim is that the unemployment rate is lower, when people arent collecting unemployment they are no longer counted as unemployed
The unemployment rate is calculated by surveying a sample of the population each month. It has nothing to do with people collecting or not collecting unemployment benefits. Educate yourself. You're from Georgia, so I know that's a novel idea.
Quote:
Some people think that to get these figures on unemployment, the government uses the number of people collecting unemployment insurance (UI) benefits under state or federal government programs. But some people are still jobless when their benefits run out, and many more are not eligible at all or delay or never apply for benefits. So, quite clearly, UI information cannot be used as a source for complete information on the number of unemployed.
Other people think that the government counts every unemployed person each month. To do this, every home in the country would have to be contacted—just as in the population census every 10 years. This procedure would cost way too much and take far too long to produce the data. In addition, people would soon grow tired of having a census taker contact them every month, year after year, to ask about job-related activities.
Because unemployment insurance records relate only to people who have applied for such benefits, and since it is impractical to count every unemployed person each month, the government conducts a monthly survey called the Current Population Survey (CPS) to measure the extent of unemployment in the country. The CPS has been conducted in the United States every month since 1940, when it began as a Work Projects Administration program. In 1942, the U.S. Census Bureau took over responsibility for the CPS. The survey has been expanded and modified several times since then. In 1994, for instance, the CPS underwent a major redesign in order to computerize the interview process as well as to obtain more comprehensive and relevant information.
There are about 60,000 eligible households in the sample for this survey. This translates into approximately 110,000 individuals each month, a large sample compared to public opinion surveys, which usually cover fewer than 2,000 people. The CPS sample is selected so as to be representative of the entire population of the United States. In order to select the sample, all of the counties and independent cities in the country first are grouped into approximately 2,000 geographic areas (sampling units). The Census Bureau then designs and selects a sample of about 800 of these geographic areas to represent each state and the District of Columbia. The sample is a state-based design and reflects urban and rural areas, different types of industrial and farming areas, and the major geographic divisions of each state.
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Zombi3]
#22485143 - 11/06/15 09:38 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Zombi3 said: My fancy pants iPhone just told me this 
That's how I found out too.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Shortknight



Registered: 02/25/13
Posts: 2,164
Last seen: 6 years, 5 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485198 - 11/06/15 09:55 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Fire the celebratory cannons! lol
Shorty
-------------------- Did I say it too loud? Big heart? Or a little misleading!
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Sun King]
#22485216 - 11/06/15 09:58 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sun King said:
Quote:
koods said: Canada should build its own ducking pipeline and its own refineries
They don't know how.
canada has a pipeline, in fact the US has a large portion of the keystone pipeline already built, obama is holding up only one leg of this pipeline that's keeping gas prices high, this in turn benefits arab oil interests and of course canadians
|
ecstaticengine10
Stranger

Registered: 11/05/15
Posts: 113
Last seen: 8 years, 2 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22485218 - 11/06/15 09:59 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Elon Musk and his electric car company will soon make oil irrelevant.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
|
It's official. Obama called Trudeau this morning and told him they won't be getting their pipeline.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485251 - 11/06/15 10:04 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
koods said: Why do we need a jobs bill? Unemployment rates are lower than thy have been in 7 years and Obama has added more jobs than both George Bushes combined
no, the claim is that the unemployment rate is lower, when people arent collecting unemployment they are no longer counted as unemployed
The unemployment rate is calculated by surveying a sample of the population each month. It has nothing to do with people collecting or not collecting unemployment benefits. Educate yourself. You're from Georgia, so I know that's a novel idea.
Quote:
Some people think that to get these figures on unemployment, the government uses the number of people collecting unemployment insurance (UI) benefits under state or federal government programs. But some people are still jobless when their benefits run out, and many more are not eligible at all or delay or never apply for benefits. So, quite clearly, UI information cannot be used as a source for complete information on the number of unemployed.
Other people think that the government counts every unemployed person each month. To do this, every home in the country would have to be contacted—just as in the population census every 10 years. This procedure would cost way too much and take far too long to produce the data. In addition, people would soon grow tired of having a census taker contact them every month, year after year, to ask about job-related activities.
Because unemployment insurance records relate only to people who have applied for such benefits, and since it is impractical to count every unemployed person each month, the government conducts a monthly survey called the Current Population Survey (CPS) to measure the extent of unemployment in the country. The CPS has been conducted in the United States every month since 1940, when it began as a Work Projects Administration program. In 1942, the U.S. Census Bureau took over responsibility for the CPS. The survey has been expanded and modified several times since then. In 1994, for instance, the CPS underwent a major redesign in order to computerize the interview process as well as to obtain more comprehensive and relevant information.
There are about 60,000 eligible households in the sample for this survey. This translates into approximately 110,000 individuals each month, a large sample compared to public opinion surveys, which usually cover fewer than 2,000 people. The CPS sample is selected so as to be representative of the entire population of the United States. In order to select the sample, all of the counties and independent cities in the country first are grouped into approximately 2,000 geographic areas (sampling units). The Census Bureau then designs and selects a sample of about 800 of these geographic areas to represent each state and the District of Columbia. The sample is a state-based design and reflects urban and rural areas, different types of industrial and farming areas, and the major geographic divisions of each state.
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
hahaha...
94,513,000 Americans Not in the Labor Force; Participation Rate Again Matches 38 Year Low http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/record-94610000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-lowest-38 http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/06/94513000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-matches-38-year-low/
but let's not take their word for it
here it is with the BLS http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
what's that? it's the baby boomers retiring? no, that's not it because many arent retiring, it seems that they cant afford to http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2014/10/03/older-adults-staying-in-labor-force-longer-means-younger-ones-participating-less http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/07/number-of-older-americans-in-the-workforce-is-on-the-rise/
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22485270 - 11/06/15 10:08 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Participation rate. LOL. You guys are total goofballs.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485344 - 11/06/15 10:23 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
and a phone survey of 60,000 people is supposed to give us an accurate reflection of the state of joblessness in the US? hahaha... yeah, so tell me, how many times were you called?
|
Sun King



Registered: 02/15/14
Posts: 4,069
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485345 - 11/06/15 10:23 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
That number includes babies and old people. (no offense)
--------------------
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Sun King]
#22485350 - 11/06/15 10:24 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sun King said: That number includes babies and old people.
no, that number is working age people, 16 to 65
|
makaveli8x8
Stranger

Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 21,636
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Prisoner#1]
#22485367 - 11/06/15 10:26 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
how many homeless/jobless people have phones? if i was broke, phone would be first thing to go
--------------------
  We were sent to hell for eternity Ø h® We play on earth to pass the time Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.
|
ecstaticengine10
Stranger

Registered: 11/05/15
Posts: 113
Last seen: 8 years, 2 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: makaveli8x8]
#22485384 - 11/06/15 10:30 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
makaveli8x8 said: how many homeless/jobless people have phones? if i was broke, phone would be first thing to go
I would keep the phone for potential calls from employers that I want to work for.
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
|
No. It is everyone 16 and older.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
qman
Stranger

Registered: 12/06/06
Posts: 34,927
Last seen: 2 hours, 15 minutes
|
|
We just got to the job totals of 2007 about 6 months ago, it took 7 years to get back to that level and that doesn't take into account population growth. Also, most of the new jobs are part time low paying service jobs. Why would anyone be bragging about employment in the US unless there's a political agenda?
|
makaveli8x8
Stranger

Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 21,636
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
|
id just use a friends number then call them back or have my friend pretend to be me, or just not even put a number, just walk in and talk to them in person a couple days after u turned it in. for me personally a phone is just the most useless waste of money that provides zero entertainment value, thats only worth is for roadside emergency's. if you lose a job and arn't sure when you'll get another that $60+ a month adds up. i get what your saying tho alot of people are addicted to their phones and would keep it tho. But on the other hand people who are chronically out of work most likely can't even afford it if they wanted one
--------------------
  We were sent to hell for eternity Ø h® We play on earth to pass the time Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.
|
Patlal
You ask too many questions



Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,797
Loc: Ottawa
Last seen: 7 hours, 20 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: makaveli8x8] 1
#22485635 - 11/06/15 11:20 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
This:

Is cleaner, safer, more efficient, less polluting than this:
--------------------
|
makaveli8x8
Stranger

Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 21,636
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Patlal] 1
#22485705 - 11/06/15 11:34 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
they spend alot of gas mining those tar sands tho, i can't remember the ratio but it didn't seem very logical. from a buisness perspective it might be profitable, but from a resource perspective we are just throwing oil away doing it. trains are actually really efficient for the amount of stuff they haul around, problem is we buy oil, then export oil because we just like to do things twice for no real reason.
--------------------
  We were sent to hell for eternity Ø h® We play on earth to pass the time Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.
|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,546
Loc: United States
Last seen: 4 minutes, 15 seconds
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485725 - 11/06/15 11:38 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
what an idiot
|
makaveli8x8
Stranger

Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 21,636
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
|
how so?
--------------------
  We were sent to hell for eternity Ø h® We play on earth to pass the time Over-population the root of all Evil-brings the Elites Closer to the gates.
|
Webster10
Up like Trump


Registered: 12/03/13
Posts: 9,966
Loc: Strawberry Fields
Last seen: 6 years, 3 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22485743 - 11/06/15 11:41 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I would normally be a bit more butthurt about this, but given today's jobs report... oh well
--------------------
|
ballsalsa
Universally Loathed and Reviled



Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,860
Loc: Foreign Lands
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Webster10] 1
#22485808 - 11/06/15 11:56 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
fuck those nasty tar sands. let the canadians pump that shit across their own country.
--------------------
Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here
|
CHeifM4sterDiezL
Chief Globerts


Registered: 07/28/10
Posts: 22,546
Loc: United States
Last seen: 4 minutes, 15 seconds
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: ballsalsa] 1
#22485820 - 11/06/15 11:59 AM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
are there any actual legitimte reasons why this thing got blocked besides "fuck canada"
|
ballsalsa
Universally Loathed and Reviled



Registered: 03/11/15
Posts: 20,860
Loc: Foreign Lands
|
|
yeah, because there is almost nothing to gain from that pipeline except increased chances of pipeline spills. let them spill the shit on their own pristine wilderness.
--------------------
Like cannabis topics? Read my cannabis blog here
|
Shortknight



Registered: 02/25/13
Posts: 2,164
Last seen: 6 years, 5 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Patlal]
#22486027 - 11/06/15 12:49 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Patlal said: This:

Is cleaner, safer, more efficient, less polluting than this:

Wait wait, I havent read any actual reports on anything, but wouldn't rail carts be much less polluting than the a pipe line in the event of major spills? Cause rail carts are each individually contained, making it hard for a major spill. Maybe they spill more micro bits in the loading process? I've never done or read up about it. Also, the complicatedness of it all haha gives more oil company jobs, helpin' out the little guy.
We really gotta figure out how to refine it ALL in Canada. That'd be nice. More more step in the country is one more step!
Shorty
-------------------- Did I say it too loud? Big heart? Or a little misleading!
|
Patlal
You ask too many questions



Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,797
Loc: Ottawa
Last seen: 7 hours, 20 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Shortknight] 1
#22486130 - 11/06/15 01:21 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
This happeed a year and a half ago in Quebec

The train derailed, something like 20 tanker blew up, it took half of downtown in flame and killed everybody in the area.
--------------------
|
Patlal
You ask too many questions



Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,797
Loc: Ottawa
Last seen: 7 hours, 20 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Patlal]
#22486137 - 11/06/15 01:24 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
--------------------
Edited by Patlal (11/06/15 01:27 PM)
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
|
Quote:
CHeifM4sterDiezL said: are there any actual legitimte reasons why this thing got blocked besides "fuck canada"
Not really, if harper wasn't such a dipshit this wouldn't matter seeing as were just gonna continue shipping it to China. He dumped a ton of money into the project already however so we lost a tidy sum of money in the process. Fucking conservatives.
|
Astral Pain
Strange

Registered: 11/10/14
Posts: 2,923
Loc: Chicago
|
|
Without the pipeline, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates have job security with their involvement with the railroads used to ship all the oil. The unemployment rate is more along the lines of 42%. Worker population of 204 million with 94 million out of the workforce. That's 46% and a far cry from the claims of 5%.
This article claims unemployment is 60%. Should be an interesting read when I get to it.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/08/21/donald-trump-is-wrong-the-true-unemployment-rate-is-not-42-its-60/
-------------------- "I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out" -Bill Hicks-
_ _
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Astral Pain]
#22486228 - 11/06/15 01:47 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Ah, isn't it always about protecting big money at this point?
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Patlal]
#22486331 - 11/06/15 02:13 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Patlal said: This happeed a year and a half ago in Quebec

The train derailed, something like 20 tanker blew up, it took half of downtown in flame and killed everybody in the area.
Sucks. Maybe you guys should build your own pipelne to Lake Superior and build your own disgusting refineries that blow up and kill people.
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
Edited by koods (11/06/15 02:13 PM)
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods] 1
#22486401 - 11/06/15 02:24 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Still better then funding hordes of terrorists overseas
|
shivas.wisdom
בּ



Registered: 02/19/09
Posts: 13,433
Loc: Turtle Island
Last seen: 2 hours, 19 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods] 1
#22486536 - 11/06/15 02:52 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
no need to take that tone, koods--tho the group of cons that ran canada for the past 10 years may have been all gung ho over oil and gas, it's not so clear that this view is reflective of the canadian populace--many polls have shown that the majority view often skews towards protection of the environment instead
and even if that wasn't the case, indigenous nations across canada are refusing to grant access to pipelines and tankers on their unceeded traditional territory
these pipelines will never be finished unless the canadian gov't sends in the army to clear the land thru force and violence--and even then, these warriors will never surrender
think oka crisis--only instead of defending their past, now it's the future that's at stake
--------------------
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22486808 - 11/06/15 03:43 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Why do we need a jobs bill? Unemployment rates are lower than thy have been in 7 years and Obama has added more jobs than both George Bushes combined
This is stunningly stupid and a flagrant lie. Job gains during the entirety of Obama's presidency don't even keep up with population growth and labor force participation is in the toilet. Do you know who isn't counted in unemployment figures? People who have given up trying and people who have exhausted their benefits.
We don't need a jobs bill. We need to get government jackboot off the necks of employers.
The only rationale for not doing Keystone is that oil prices are so low. Do you know what would be a great jobs bill? End the prohibition on exporting US oil.
--------------------
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: zappaisgod]
#22486815 - 11/06/15 03:45 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
lol what bullshit
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods] 1
#22486835 - 11/06/15 03:49 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
There is nothing bullshit about it. What fact would you like to dispute?
--------------------
|
1234go
Ban Lotto Champion


Registered: 07/08/09
Posts: 53,868
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22486898 - 11/06/15 04:04 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Look how cute those little guys are..
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: zappaisgod]
#22486904 - 11/06/15 04:06 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Obama has added 8.4 million jobs in 7 years
George Bush I and 2 added a total of 4 million in 12 years
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
starfire_xes
I Am 'They'



Registered: 10/24/09
Posts: 21,590
Loc: Dallas with all the assho...
Last seen: 7 months, 2 days
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22487074 - 11/06/15 04:43 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
YYYEEEEEEEHHAAAAWWWWWWWWW!
Dogshit Barry strikes again--the marxist dickhead race-baiting faggot from a donkey's asshole.
--------------------
    [/url] [/url]
IF THE NEIGHBORS COMPLAIN BECAUSE THE MUSIC'S TOO LOUD, TURN IT UP SO YOU CAN'T HEAR THEM BITCH
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22487081 - 11/06/15 04:44 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
--------------------
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: zappaisgod]
#22487085 - 11/06/15 04:45 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
--------------------
|
koods
Ribbit



Registered: 05/26/11
Posts: 106,059
Loc: Maryland/DC Burbs
Last seen: 1 hour, 59 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: starfire_xes]
#22487162 - 11/06/15 05:00 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
starfire_xes said: YYYEEEEEEEHHAAAAWWWWWWWWW!
Dogshit Barry strikes again--the marxist dickhead race-baiting faggot from a donkey's asshole.
Your posts sound like they were written by a 14 year old not a 70 year old
--------------------
NotSheekle said “if I believed she was 16 I would become unattracted to her”
|
Patlal
You ask too many questions



Registered: 10/09/10
Posts: 44,797
Loc: Ottawa
Last seen: 7 hours, 20 minutes
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22487244 - 11/06/15 05:18 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said:
Quote:
starfire_xes said: YYYEEEEEEEHHAAAAWWWWWWWWW!
Dogshit Barry strikes again--the marxist dickhead race-baiting faggot from a donkey's asshole.
Your posts sound like they were written by a 14 year old not a 70 year old
It was written for the readers of this website of whch the average age is roughly 14 years old.
--------------------
|
starfire_xes
I Am 'They'



Registered: 10/24/09
Posts: 21,590
Loc: Dallas with all the assho...
Last seen: 7 months, 2 days
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22487246 - 11/06/15 05:18 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Well, you have to have a 14 year old mentality to get through to people who support DOgshit Barry.
--------------------
    [/url] [/url]
IF THE NEIGHBORS COMPLAIN BECAUSE THE MUSIC'S TOO LOUD, TURN IT UP SO YOU CAN'T HEAR THEM BITCH
|
Konyap

Registered: 06/30/07
Posts: 33,945
Loc: Planet Piss
Last seen: 4 years, 2 months
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: starfire_xes]
#22488076 - 11/06/15 08:14 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
suck a dick Canada
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: Patlal]
#22488114 - 11/06/15 08:23 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Patlal said: This happeed a year and a half ago in Quebec

The train derailed, something like 20 tanker blew up, it took half of downtown in flame and killed everybody in the area.
thank goodness for safe transportation of oil and shit. obama is trying to destroy the lush, green canadian wilderness as well... OBAMA MURDERED THE POLAR BEARS!
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Obama to reject Keystone Pipeline [Re: koods]
#22488165 - 11/06/15 08:32 PM (8 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koods said: Obama has added 8.4 million jobs in 7 years
were those public sector jobs because obama didnt create a damn job for anyone but his cronies
who filled all those jobs he supposedly created
oh... that's why US unemployment is so low, the illegals hold almost 6 million of those 8 million jobs
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/31/two-thirds-of-jobs-go-to-immigrants/?page=all
even the uber liberal politifact states that 70% went to illegals http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/dec/02/peter-morici/economist-immigrants-have-taken-all-new-jobs-creat/
so where are all the american workers, the 60 million that are unemployed, not student and not retired getting jobs to keep the unemployment numbers so low? could it be that you're being lied to and you spread those lies like a street preacher telling us that jesus has come and we're all going to heaven
Quote:
George Bush I and 2 added a total of 4 million in 12 years
they didnt create anything outside of government jobs, just like obama
|
|