Home | Community | Message Board

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: mongo lloyd]
    #14896149 -

:fagface:
Why is there a background? :wtfsonic:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Mad_Larkin]
    #14896175 -

:yuno:


--------------------
No sympathy for the devil, keep that in mind.
[url=
]Buy the ticket, take the ride. [/url]
Are you lost?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Legend]
    #14896208 -

You can always just use


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Sophistic Radiance]
    #14896398 -

Tchan909 said:
:dudewtf:
How did he even do that?



I believe he made some article suggesting that black holes are not completely black.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Legend]
    #14896402 -

I guess it's cool that a crippie can do theoretical physics, but his theories aren't very good. IMO he has done more good by motivating other physicists to prove him wrong, opposed to actually contributing knowledge.

Also, I feel that he is being a little reckless with all his "god doesn't exist claims", because non-scientists don't exactly understand these claims, and tend to take them personally.
Just to clarify.. he is simply saying God is not capable of supernatural interaction with our universe, but the possibility for a God existing outside of our universe(and time) still holds.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Silversoul]
    #14896412 -

Silversoul said:
If you asked a bunch of average people who the greatest physicist alive is, a lot of them would say Stephen Hawking.  If you asked a bunch of physicists the same question, he wouldn't even come in the top 10.  He's more of a science popularizer than a scientist, and as a science popularizer, he doesn't hold a candle to Carl Sagan, or even Michio Kaku.





thank you. could not of said it better myself

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: mushiepussy]
    #14896417 -

I'm really sure he used that particular wording because it would get attention. It was all over the news for a couple days. What he was saying was far from revolutionary, but because he said it, people acted like it wasn't just more :blah: we hear from anybody who takes an authoritative stance on the subject. I lost a lot of respect for him over that one.


--------------------
Enlil said:
You really are the worst kind of person.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Silversoul]
    #14896438 -

Silversoul said:
Tchan909 said:
:dudewtf:
How did he even do that?



I believe he made some article suggesting that black holes are not completely black.



They emit Hawking radiation, which makes them glow.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: mushiepussy]
    #14896494 -

mushiepussy said:
I guess it's cool that a crippie can do theoretical physics, but his theories aren't very good.




Wow, tough crowd.  Hawking did more great work in one decade than most theoretical physicists do their entire career.  The public may not have known him if he wasn't a cripple, but his work does stand on its own.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: DieCommie]
    #14896509 -

Stephen Hawking, cool guy. If I see him on TV, I'll stop and watch. He deserves to be listened to.


--------------------
+1 Post ٩(̾๏̮̮̃̾๏̃̾)۶


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: DieCommie]
    #14896511 -

Its not like anyone talking shit about him actually understands or knows what he's worked on... :smilingpuppy:


--------------------
¿Check out some art m8?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Coaster]
    #14896519 -

Coaster said:
all he does is think about zeitgeist





God damnit coaster, he's a physicist, not some new-age poo-poo eater.


--------------------

wat man rly

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: mongo lloyd]
    #14896589 -

lol I love the fact that he comes out and says God can't exist on Discovery channel!


--------------------


∞
I am incapable of conceiving infinity, and yet I do not accept finity.
- Simone de Beauvoir -

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: snoot]
    #14896743 -

Carl Sagan was a physicist.  An astrophysicist to be precise.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: blujay]
    #14897036 -

blujay said:
Coaster said:
all he does is think about zeitgeist





God damnit coaster, he's a physicist, not some new-age poo-poo eater.



i was using zeitgeist as an actual word
*the spirit, attitude, or general outlook of a specific time or period


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Coaster]
    #14897380 -

The famous Cosmologist is not infallible. He was proven wrong by a Flasher, to which he admitted he was wrong. And now a 12 year old is setting out on a quest to disprove this CYBORG's theories on the Big Bang.

Perhaps he should be sweating his butt pad off.



--------------------
"With me the horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man’s mind, which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey’s mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind." Charles Darwin

"DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is, and we dance to its music." Richard Dawkins


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: RonaldFuckingPaul]
    #14897527 -

reeferaddict69 said:
Carl Sagan was a physicist.  An astrophysicist to be precise.




yes but he had much more influence and did much more work turning people onto the beauty and awesomeness of science than he did actuaslly contributing new theories etc.

Sagan knew how to wow the laymen.. Hell he is the reason I'm majoring in physics

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: realfuzzhead]
    #14897598 -

I did not know he cheated on his wife...how?...why?...with who?

:freshwtf:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Shroomerited]
    #14898007 -

Hawking revealed that he did not see much point in obtaining a doctorate if he were to die soon. Hawking later said that the real turning point was his 1965 marriage to Jane Wilde, a language student.[11] After gaining his PhD at Trinity Hall, Stephen became first a Research Fellow, and later on a Professorial Fellow at Gonville and Caius College.

Jane Hawking (née Wilde), Hawking's first wife, cared for him until 1991 when the couple separated, reportedly because of the pressures of fame and his increasing disability. They had three children: Robert (b. 1967), Lucy (b. 1969), and Timothy (b. 1979). Hawking then married his nurse, Elaine Mason (who was previously married to David Mason, the designer of the first version of Hawking's talking computer), in 1995. In October 2006, Hawking filed for divorce from his second wife[51] amid claims by former nurses that she had abused him.

Quote:
Stephen Hawking's ex-wife writes tell-all
Jane Hawking chronicles the misery of her marriage.
By Craig Offman

    *

In 1990, world-renowned physicist Stephen Hawking did what looked like a bad, bad thing. The author of "A Brief History of Time," who suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, dropped his wife of almost 30 years and took off with a younger woman -- his nurse, Elaine Mason. But as is revealed in Jane Hawking's new tell-all, "Music to Move the Stars," their marriage was much more complicated than anybody knew.

Published in Britain by Macmillan, the 610-page tome of woe hits the shelves on Friday. In it, Jane Hawking chronicles the hardships of marriage to a famous genius with a famous degenerative disease. She is startlingly frank about her feelings, calling her ex-husband an "all-powerful emperor" and a "masterly puppeteer." She notes at one point, "It was becoming very difficult -- unnatural, even -- to feel desire for someone with the body of a Holocaust victim and the undeniable needs of an infant."

Desperate for emotional and physical fulfillment, she says, in 1985 she began an affair with a family friend, musician Jonathan Hellyer-Jones, whom she had met in 1977 after joining a local choir. Her husband gave tacit sanction to the relationship; the pair married in 1996.

As a stressed-out caregiver, Jane Hawking suffered huge bouts of depression. "A brittle, empty shell, alone and vulnerable, restrained only by the thought of my children from throwing myself into the river, drowning in a slough of despond, I prayed for help with the desperate insistency of a potential suicide," she writes. But she felt she had no option but to stick with the relationship. "I couldn't go off and leave Stephen. Coals of fire would have been heaped on my head if I had."

The book has already set off at least one feud. Laura Gentry, who helped transcribe Stephen Hawking's "Brief History," told the London Observer, "Hearing him described as a cruel, scheming man really upsets me." Gentry claimed that in 1985, when the scientist was suffering from pneumonia, Jane Hawking, who was already involved with Hellyer-Jones, contemplated switching off her husband's life-support machine.

According to Jane Hawking's editor, Mary Evans, "Music to Move the Stars" doesn't have a U.S. publisher yet, despite the scientist's huge fame. In terms of influence, Hawking is often compared to Isaac Newton. "A Brief History of Time" sold more than 25 million copies worldwide.





--------------------


∞
I am incapable of conceiving infinity, and yet I do not accept finity.
- Simone de Beauvoir -

Edited by snoot (08/09/11 09:36 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: Your view on Stephen Hawking [Re: Hakim0777]
    #14898608 -

Hakim0777 said:
yea but next to roger ebert that would be one rightously terrifying suckjob. how much would you have to pay one of those girls to swallow his manky load while looking him dead in the eyes.



dead in the eyes.  :blowjob:



Have you seen Ebert's actual wife? it's worse than if he fucked Oprah....



...or is Martin Lawrence just wearing a wig and a fat suit again?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  [ show all ]


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Stephen Hawking no longer confined to wheelchair. LloydChristmas 1,155 14 12/08/06 02:47 AM
by LloydChristmas
* The Mighty Stephen Hawking llamabox 644 6 04/30/06 03:39 AM
by LloydChristmas
* Prof Stephen Hawking in Zero-G theorganicdomino 682 4 04/27/07 01:14 PM
by Kickle
* Stephen Hawking sings parklife! Nalim 824 6 01/17/07 03:32 PM
by Viveka
* Stephen Hawking trendalM 464 2 06/07/07 05:13 PM
by Effed
* Stephen Hawking's Universe (cool video) Jfisher 479 1 07/16/06 03:01 PM
by theuser
* saint stephen notapillow 2,712 17 01/07/04 11:24 AM
by shaggy101
* Your favorite Stephen King novel?
( 1 2 all )
AislingGheal 4,551 23 03/19/03 10:35 AM
by Bruiser

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
5,517 topic views. 3 members, 131 guests and 89 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.039 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 16 queries.