Anonymous #5 said: Completely true, I mean just the way it was done compared to today's films shows how far the anty has been upped. If you look at deepthroat the movie, versus something common today like gagfactor the only conclusion is things got a whole lot more fucked up.
To me, it says how far we've come from our puritanical roots of sexual repression, where touching your own penis was considered an abomination.
Anonymous #5 said:Perhaps the worst site is facial abuse. When they jam a cock down someones throat to the point that vomit burns their eyes, and that becomes a turn on for a viewer, it is sickening.
To you. Stop moralizing about all this shit. Let people do what they want to do. If they aren't hurting you, what's the fucking problem?
Quote: Anonymous #5 said:Bulimics get high off the endorphins when they purge, and yet it is looked down upon because it is harmful to the person in every way possible.
False analogy. The reason it's looked down upon is not because it is harmful, but because it suggests a lack of control and a desire to conform to standards of beauty that cannot be had through willpower. There are plenty of things out there that are "harmful" that no one looks down upon (e.g. playing professional football will cause you to die at a much younger age according to reliable studies; no one I've ever met looks down on this just because it is unhealthy).
Quote: Anonymous #5 said:Getting off to survival reflex endorphin rushes is a sign of something wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
Quote: Anonymous #5 said:To the posters with the wiki links: Linking to wikipedia is getting tiresome, sure you can point out what appeal to ridicules are, and ad hominem, but this is about fucked up sexuality that can only get worse from here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope
"Fucked up" is your moralizing opinion. Some people seem to enjoy it and go on to live normal, productive lives.
Quote: Anonymous #5 said:Damn parents won't touch the subject of love and sex with kids now and days due to sex ed classes that utterly fail, and they think "O they will learn from cable and the internet." Well when they walk in on Johnny going on with an ass to mouth facefuck with Susie, they will then know just how much they fucked up.
Terrible argument, just terrible. You have failed to explain why this is so bad except to give a vivid description of a sex scene that defies society's traditional sex narratives. It doesn't make people who engage in them bad people, nor do the acts cause a cascading decline in civilization's standards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parade_of_horribles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children
Quote: Anonymous #5 said:Brings me to a side topic, the popular ass to mouth commonly placed with the other rough stuff. There are infections in the adult entertainment industry that have never been seen before due the practice of ass to mouth, especially when it is a chick being fucked in the ass and it is jammed in another chick's throat.
Oh, I see. After you've moralized the hell out of it, now you want to say your argument is actually about protecting people's health. Please.
Quote: Anonymous #5 said: There shouldn't be any appeal to a practice such as this. It is dangerous, disgusting, and if one get's off to it, you need to take a serious break from porn.
Empty moralizing again, with no clear articulation of exactly what the problem is. Why shouldn't your argument extend to every other goddamn thing on this planet? - the use of guns will cause everyone to kill everyone else - the use of marijuana will cause everyone to get hooked on meth - the use of cell phone technology will cause everyone to opt out of society and upload their consciousnesses online
Come on, give me a break. Basically, you've got a prejudice and nothing anyone says can change your find. You have a moral issue with the act in question, and are now searching for reasons to validate your view. You should read this very interesting article, as I think it relates quite a bit to this conversation:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/13/magazine/13Psychology-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print
New York Time article by Steven Pinker: But consider these situations:
Julie is traveling in France on summer vacation from college with her brother Mark. One night they decide that it would be interesting and fun if they tried making love. Julie was already taking birth-control pills, but Mark uses a condom, too, just to be safe. They both enjoy the sex but decide not to do it again. They keep the night as a special secret, which makes them feel closer to each other. What do you think about that — was it O.K. for them to make love?
Most people immediately declare that these acts are wrong and then grope to justify why they are wrong. It’s not so easy. In the case of Julie and Mark, people raise the possibility of children with birth defects, but they are reminded that the couple were diligent about contraception. They suggest that the siblings will be emotionally hurt, but the story makes it clear that they weren’t. They submit that the act would offend the community, but then recall that it was kept a secret. Eventually many people admit, “I don’t know, I can’t explain it, I just know it’s wrong.” People don’t generally engage in moral reasoning, Haidt argues, but moral rationalization: they begin with the conclusion, coughed up by an unconscious emotion, and then work backward to a plausible justification.
Quote: Anonymous #5 said: I said it once, and I will say it again. Sex liberation became enslavement.
Stating this does not make it true.
Anonymous #5 said:Kids "study" porn, I kid you not. Guys will say they take notes to try something out.
So what?
Quote: Anonymous #5 said:You cannot completely shield yourselves from it, but you should do your best, as men and women exposed to erotica they are uncomfortable with they subconsciously become more and more turned on to it. They build a tolerance to what they see as well, and from there the sky is the limit. Perversion to violent sex is easier than one thinks, which is why we need to take account for our actions, before our actions lead us down a road of no return.
You sound like some ridiculous Christian pastor, railing about gays and single mothers and how they are single-handedly causing the disintegration of our society. Ludicrous exaggerations and 'sky-is-falling' thinking.
Quote: Anonymous #5 said: The mind was never ready to be bombarded with this much stimulation, and one will always attempt to achieve a greater rush. One doesn't start looking at the hardcore rough stuff (generally) until they want more of a kick then the normal porn/softcore material that once gave them just as much of a rush. One cannot win the battle, as satisfaction will never be obtained. It is simply the wrong approach.
Question: why aren't you railing about action movies too? Isn't all that violence affecting us too? Shouldn't we ban movies with graphic scenes of death and violence? Isn't it just fueling our desire for increased sensation??
Edited by Anonymous (07/14/10 12:31 PM)
|