Loafy said:

Yes. I did. Wouldn't you rather have animals being tested instead of humans?

---

EatShroomsNtCows said:

Loafy said:

Yes. I did. Wouldn't you rather have animals being tested instead of humans?

---

The choice isn?t between animals and people. There?s no guarantee that drugs are safe just because they?ve been tested on animals. Because of the physiological differences between humans and other animals, results from animal tests cannot be accurately extrapolated to humans, leaving us vulnerable to exposure to drugs that can cause serious side effects. Drugs that sicken or kill animals don?t always prevent a drug from being marketed. So much evidence has accumulated about differences in the effects that chemicals have on animals and humans that government officials often do not act on findings from animal studies. In the last two decades, many drugs, including phenacitin, Eferol, Oraflex, Suprol, and Selacryn, were taken off the market after causing hundreds of deaths and/or injuries. In fact, more than half the drugs that the Food and Drug Administration approved between 1976 and 1985 were either removed from the market or relabeled because of serious side effects. If the pharmaceutical industry switched from animal experiments to sophisticated non-animal tests, we would have greater protection, not less.

---

FooManShroom said:

EatShroomsNtCows said:

Loafy said:

Yes. I did. Wouldn't you rather have animals being tested instead of humans?

---

The choice isn?t between animals and people. There?s no guarantee that drugs are safe just because they?ve been tested on animals. Because of the physiological differences between humans and other animals, results from animal tests cannot be accurately extrapolated to humans, leaving us vulnerable to exposure to drugs that can cause serious side effects. Drugs that sicken or kill animals don?t always prevent a drug from being marketed. So much evidence has accumulated about differences in the effects that chemicals have on animals and humans that government officials often do not act on findings from animal studies. In the last two decades, many drugs, including phenacitin, Eferol, Oraflex, Suprol, and Selacryn, were taken off the market after causing hundreds of deaths and/or injuries. In fact, more than half the drugs that the Food and Drug Administration approved between 1976 and 1985 were either removed from the market or relabeled because of serious side effects. If the pharmaceutical industry switched from animal experiments to sophisticated non-animal tests, we would have greater protection, not less.

---

Wow, you had the peta scripts ready?

---

mindcandy said:

You're pretty hot. but a PETA freak!!

i see you have a pitbull(i think anyways) if so why do you support peta which wants all pits exterminated

---

Loafy said:

I'm not reading any of that, unless it's broken up into sections.

---

Loafy said:

Yea, and i'm not going to strain my eyes are your PETA bull shit

---

EatShroomsNtCows said:

mindcandy said:

You're pretty hot. but a PETA freak!!

i see you have a pitbull(i think anyways) if so why do you support peta which wants all pits exterminated

---

I don't know where you heard that but I can assure you that it is 100% untrue.  I have been volunteering for PETA for 9 years and know their position on every animal rights issue.  PETA advocates spaying and neutering companion animals in order to prevent extermination from occurring.
Every day in the United States, tens of thousands of puppies and kittens are born. Compare this to the 11,000 human births each day, and it?s clear that there can never be enough homes for all these animals. Shelters are stuck with the heartrending job of dealing with animals nobody wants. Those who refuse to spay and neuter their animals, who abandon animals when they grow tired of them, and who patronize pet shops instead of adopting stray or shelter animals make euthanasia a tragic necessity.

---

mindcandy said:

EatShroomsNtCows said:

mindcandy said:

You're pretty hot. but a PETA freak!!

i see you have a pitbull(i think anyways) if so why do you support peta which wants all pits exterminated

---

I don't know where you heard that but I can assure you that it is 100% untrue.  I have been volunteering for PETA for 9 years and know their position on every animal rights issue.  PETA advocates spaying and neutering companion animals in order to prevent extermination from occurring.
Every day in the United States, tens of thousands of puppies and kittens are born. Compare this to the 11,000 human births each day, and it?s clear that there can never be enough homes for all these animals. Shelters are stuck with the heartrending job of dealing with animals nobody wants. Those who refuse to spay and neuter their animals, who abandon animals when they grow tired of them, and who patronize pet shops instead of adopting stray or shelter animals make euthanasia a tragic necessity.

---

http://www.workingpitbull.com/truthaboutpeta.htm

---

Quote:

i see you have a pitbull(i think anyways) if so why do you support peta which wants all pits exterminated

---